Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Alternative measures of political efficacy: models and means

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the 1982 and 1984 American national election surveys the CPS deleted a subset of its longstanding measures of political efficacy. This paper employs covariance structure analysis to test a two-factor measurement model based on alternative indicators. The model has an excellent fit for data from the 1964–84 national surveys as well as for different educational, gender, and racial groups in the 1984 study. Consistent with previous theorizing, the internal efficacy factor is significantly more stable than the external factor. Also, the two efficacy factors correlate as expected with measures of general personal competence and political trust. The paper is the first to use LISREL structured means tests to test group differences in levels of efficacy or other important political attitudes. Since this technique is not well-known, a tutorial appendix describing its implementation in LISREL VI is included to facilitate future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, P.R. (1983). Political Attitudes in America. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acock, A.C., Clarke, H.D. & Stewart, M.C. (1985). ‘A new model for old measures: A covariance structure analysis of political efficacy’, Journal of Politics 47: 1061–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G. & Sidney, V. (1963). The Civic Culture. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balch, G.S. (1974). “Multiple indicators in survey research: The concept ‘sense of political efficacy’”, Political Methodology 1: 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, S.H. & M.Kaase (1979). Political Action. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S.E. (1984). “The dimensions of Americans' basic political orientations, 1964–1980”, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Ill.

  • Center for Political Studies (1980). American National Election Study, 1984. Second ICPSR edition, Vol. 1. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, H.D. & Acock, A.C. (1989). “National elections and political attitudes: The case of political efficacy”, British Journal of Political Science 19: 551–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, S.C. & Maggiotto, M.A. (1982). “Measuring political efficacy”, Political Methodology 8: 85–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ineygar, S. (1980). “Subjective political efficacy as a measure of diffuse support”, Public Opinion Quarterly 44: 249–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L. (1987). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M.K. & Niemi, R.G. (1981). Generations and Politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K.G. & Sorbom, D. (1984), LISREL VI: User's Guide. 3rd Edition. Mooresville, Indiana: Scientific Software, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R.E. (1959). Political Life. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomax, R.G. (1983). “A guide to multiple-sample structural equation modeling”, Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation 15: 580–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J.S. (1983). Confirmatory Factor Analysis: A Preface to LISREL. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, Miller, J., Welch, S., & Clark, C. (1977). “The stability and reliability of political efficacy: Using path analysis to test alternative models”, American Political Science Review 71: 509–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, L. & Goel, M.L. (1977). Political Participation. 2nd edition. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W.E., Miller, A.H. & Schneider, E.J. (1980). American National Election Studies Data Sourcebook, 1952–1978. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shingles, R.D. (1981). “Black political consciousness and political participation: The missing link”, American Political Science Review 75: 76–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, S. & Clark, C. (1975). “Determinants of change in political efficacy: A test of two hypotheses, Journal of Political and Military Sociology 3: 207–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Life Course and Population Studies, Department of Sociology, Louisiana State University, 70803-5411, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA

    Alan C. Acock

  2. Department of Political Science, University of North Texas, 7603-5338, Denton, Texas, USA

    Harold D. Clarke

Authors
  1. Alan C. Acock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Harold D. Clarke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Acock, A.C., Clarke, H.D. Alternative measures of political efficacy: models and means. Qual Quant 24, 87–105 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221386

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221386

Keywords

Search

Navigation