Summary
Three types of setae were found on the antenna of workers of C. formosanus. Sensilla basiconica function as chemoreceptors. They are non-socketed, with fixed plate base, thin walled, and perforated. Pore tubules are contained within the cuticular pores of s. basiconica. The pore tubules have direct contact with the dendritic branches within the sensilla. The other sensilla are tactile mechanoreceptors. The longest setae (sensilla trichodea) are thick walled, socketed, mononeuronic, and non-perforated. The shorter mechanoreceptors (sensilla chaetica) have the same characteristics as s. trichodea, exept that they are sometimes dineuronic. The numbers and distribution of the sensilla were established.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abushama, F.T.: The olfactory receptors on the antennae of the dampwood termite, Zootermopsis angusticollis. Entomol. Month. Mag. 100, 145–147 (1965)
Anonymous: Damage by Formosan subterranean termite. USDA Coop. Econ. Insect Rep. 16, 562–564 (1966)
Ernst, K.D.: Die Feinstruktur von Riechsensillen auf der Antenne des Aaskäfers Necrophorus (Coleoptera). Z. Zellforsch. 94, 72–102 (1969)
Hawke, S.D., Farley, R.D.: The role of pore structures in the selective permeability of antennal sensilla of the desert burrowing cockroach, Arenivaga sp. Tissue and Cell 3, 665–674 (1971)
Matsumura, F., Jewett, D.M., Coppel, H.C.: Interspecific response of termite to synthetic trail-following substances. J. Econ. Entomol. 65, 600–601 (1972)
Merlins, J.W., Coppel, H.C., Matsumura, F.: Sternal gland in Coptotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 64, 478–480 (1971)
Norris, D.M., Chu, H.: Morphology and ultrastructure of the antenna of male Periplaneta americana as related to chemoreception. Cell Tiss. Res. 150, 1–9 (1974)
Prestage, J.J., Slifer, E.H., Stephens, L.B.: Thin sensory peg on the antenna of the termite worker, Reticulitermes flavipes. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 56, 874–878 (1963)
Richard, G.: Nervous system and sense organs. In: Biology of termites, Vol. I (K. Krishna and F.M. Weesner, eds.), pp. 161–192. New York: Acad. Press 1969
Slifer, E.H.: A rapid and sensitive method for identifying permeable areas in the body wall of insects. Entomol. News 71, 179–182 (1960)
Slifer, E.H.: The fine structure of insect sense organs. Int. Rev. Cytol. 11, 125–159 (1961)
Slifer, E.H.: Sense organs on the antennal flagella of earwigs (Dermaptera) with special reference to those of Forficula auricularia L. J. Morph. 122, 63–80 (1967)
Thurm, U.: Mechanoreceptors in the cuticle of the honeybee. Fine structure and stimulus mechanism. Science 145, 1063–1065 (1964)
Thurm, U.: An insect mechanoreceptor. Part I: Fine structure and adequate stimulus. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 30, 75–82 (1965)
Zacharuch, R.Y., Blue, S.G.: Ultrastructure of the peg and hair sensilla on the antenna of larva Aedes aegypti (L.). J. Morph. 135, 433–456 (1971)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, and in part by the M.U.C.I.A. program, the National Science Foundation Grant No. 36700, and the U.S.D.A., Forest Service Cooperative Project 12-13. The authors also acknowledge the SEM and TEM assistance of S. D. Carlson, M. Garment, and G. Gaard, respectively
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tarumingkeng, R.C., Coppel, H.C. & Matsumura, F. Morphology and ultrastructure of the antennal chemoreceptors and mechanoreceptors of worker Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki. Cell Tissue Res. 173, 173–178 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221373
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221373