Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of concurrent pseudomonas or xanthomonas exposure on adherence of acanthamoeba castellanii to soft contact lenses

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

• Background: Approximately 85% of Acanthamoeba-contaminated contact lens systems in asymptomatic patients have concurrent bacterial contamination. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Xanthomonas maltophilia are common contect lens contaminants; we investigated the effect of coincubation of Acanthamoeba adherence to contact lenses. • Methods: A. castellanii, 1 × 105 organisms/ml, was coincubated with P. aeruginosa or X. maltophilia, 1 × 108 CFU/ml in phosphate-buffered saline. Sterile, unworn polymacon, etafilcon A or lidofilcon contact lens were investigated. The experimental groups were: (I) lenses exposed to bacteria for 1 h, then Acanthamoeba for 2 h; (II) lenses exposed concurrently to bacteria and Acanthamoeba for 2 h; (III) Acanthamoeba coincubated with bacteria for 24 h, then lenses exposed for 2 h; (IV) lenses exposed to Acanthamoeba for 2 h (control). • Results: For all experimental groups, Acanthamoeba adherence was greater to lidofilcon than to polymacon and etafilcon. For both P. aeruginosa and X. maltophilia, neither group I nor group II displayed greater Acanthamoeba adherence than group IV. Group III exhibited significantly less adherence than group IV for lidofilcon and polymacon. The decrease in group III adherence reflected an overall decrease in Acanthamoeba trophozoite concentration.

• Conclusion: Short bacteria/Acanthamoeba coincubation times did not result in increased Acanthamoeba adherence. Twenty-four-hour coincubation resulted in decreased adherence for Pseudomonas and unchanged adherence rates for Xanthomonas. This model suggests that Pseudomonas or Xanthomonas co-contamination does not necessarily facilitate quantitative Acanthamoeba contact lens adherence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stehr-Green JK, Bailey TM, Visvesvara GS (1989) The epidemiology of Acanthamoeba keratitis in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol 107:106–109

    Google Scholar 

  2. Larkin DFP, Kilvington S, Easty DL (1990) Contamination of contact lens storage cases by Acanthamoeba and bacteria. Am J Ophthalmol 74:133–135

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donzis PB, Mondino BJ, Weissman BA, Bruckner DA (1987) Microbial contamination of contact lens care system. Am J Ophthalmol 104:325–333

    Google Scholar 

  4. Larkin DFP, Easty DL (1990) External eye flora as a nutrient source for Acanthamoeba. Graefés Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 228:458–460

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bottone EJ, Madayag RM, Qureshi MN (1992) Acanthamoeba keratitis: synergy between amebic and bacterial co-contaminants in contact lens care systems as a prelude to infection. J Clin Microbiol 30:2447–2450

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ahern MA, Dunnill MS (1992) Morphometry. Arnold, Sevenoaks, UK

    Google Scholar 

  7. John T, Desai D, Sahm D (1991) Adherence of Acanthamoeba castellanii cysts and trophozoites to extended wear soft contact lenses. Rev Infect Dis 13 [Suppl]:419–420

    Google Scholar 

  8. Qureshi MN, Perez AA, Madayag RM, Bottone EJ (1993) Inhibition of Acanthamoeba species by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: rationale for their selective exclusion in corneal ulcers and contact lens care systems. J Clin Microbiol 31:1908–1910

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, L.D., Xu, L. The effect of concurrent pseudomonas or xanthomonas exposure on adherence of acanthamoeba castellanii to soft contact lenses. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 234, 311–314 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00220706

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00220706

Keywords

Navigation