Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 81, Issue 4, pp 461–470 | Cite as

Intraspecific variation of chloroplast DNA in Dioscorea bulbifera L.

  • R. Terauchi
  • T. Terachi
  • K. Tsunewaki


Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of chloroplast (ct) DNAs from 15 accessions of Dioscorea bulbifera collected from Africa and Asia was carried out using the Southern hybridization technique. Eight cloned ctDNA fragments of D. bulbifera and D. opposita, which cover 80% of the total chloroplast genome, were used as the probes to detect variation in ctDNA digested with nine restriction endonucleases. Ten variable sites, located in the large and small single-copy regions, were disclosed among the 15 accessions, of which six showed base substitution and four carried length mutation. Positions of the latter mutations were determined on the physical map of ctDNA. Based on these results, chloroplast genomes of the 15 accessions could be classified into nine types. Their phylogenetic relationships are assumed to be as follows: (1) African and Asian chloroplast genomes diverged from each other at the earliest point in time; (2) E-type chloroplast genome, occurring in the south-east edge of the Asian continent, appears to be the most ancient among all the Asian chloroplast genomes; and (3) four chloroplast genomes, found in Asian insular regions, are probably derived independently from the E-type genome. The discrepancy between the taxonomic relationship and the proposed chloroplast genome phylogeny of the present materials is noted.

Key words

Dioscorea bulbifera L. Chloroplast DNA RFLP analysis Southern hybridization Phylogeny 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Avise JC, Arnold J, Ball RM, Bermingham E, Lamb T, Neigel JE, Reeb CA, Saunders NC (1987) Intraspecific phylogeography: the mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:489–522Google Scholar
  2. Burkill IH (1960) The organography and the evolution of the Dioscoreaceae, the family of the yams. J Linn Soc London Bot 56:319–412Google Scholar
  3. Chevalier A (1913) Etudes sur la flore de l'Afrique centrale française, vol 1. Challamel, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Chevalier A (1936) Contribution à l'étude de quelques espèces africaines du genre Dioscorea. Bull Mus Nat Hist Nat Paris 8:520–525Google Scholar
  5. Coursey DG (1972) The civilization of the yam: interrelationships of man and yams in Africa and the Indopacific region. Archaeol Phys Anthropol Aceania 7:215–233Google Scholar
  6. Miège J (1954) Les cultures vivrières en Afrique occidentale. Cahiers d'Outre-Mer 7[25]:25–50Google Scholar
  7. Miège J (1982) De quelque caractères discriminatoires entres les taxons intraspécifiques de D. bulbifera L. In: Miège J, Lyonga SN (eds) Yams ignames. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 197–231Google Scholar
  8. Prain D, Burkill IH (1936) An account of the genus Dioscorea in the East. I. The species which twine to the left. Annu Rep Bot Gard Calcutta 14:1–210Google Scholar
  9. Sneath PHA, Sokal RO (1973) Numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  10. Southern EM (1975) Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol 98:503–517PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Terauchi R, Terachi T, Tsunewaki K (1989) Physical map of chloroplast DNA of aerial yam, Dioscorea bulbifera L. Theor Appl Genet 78:1–10Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Terauchi
    • 1
  • T. Terachi
    • 2
  • K. Tsunewaki
    • 3
  1. 1.Plant Germ-Plasm Institute, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Institute for Land Development and Utilization, Kyoto Sangyo UniversityKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Laboratory of Genetics, Faculty of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations