Abstract
A perturbation theory approach of non-linear mechanics is applied to the solution of a non-linear rotation anemometer dynamic equation in a gusty wind. The first two terms of the perturbation series give a simplified equation for the wind-speed overestimation by a rotation anemometer (u-error) in terms of a wind velocity spectrum (or a correlation function). The equation agrees satisfactorily with all the known analytical or numerical solutions of rotation anemometer equations. It agrees, in particular, with recent theoretical estimations of the u-error magnitude by Kondo et al. (1971) and Hyson (1972), but disagrees significantly with the experimental findings of Izumi and Barad (1970) and Högström (1974). The same approach is also used for the estimation of the influence of the vertical wind fluctuations on the rotation anemometer readings (w-error). It is shown that w-error is usually of the same sign as u-error and that the sum of these both types of errors may be in some cases of the same order as an experimental wind-speed overestimation observed by Izumi and Barad and by Högström. However, it seems probable that some additional types of errors contribute also to the real overspeeding of rotation anemometers in a gusty wind.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Businger, J. A., Wyngaard, J. C., Izumi, Y., and Bradley, E. F.: 1971, Flux-Profile Relationships in the Atmospheric Surface Layer, J. Atmospheric Sci. 28, 181–189.
Deacon, E. L.: 1951, The Over-Estimation Error of Cup Anemometers in Fluctuating Winds. J. Sci. Instr. 28, 231–234.
Frenzen, P.: 1973, The Observed Relation Between the Kolmogorov and von Kármán Constants in the Surface Boundary Layer, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 3, 348–358.
Frenzen, P.: 1974, On the Response of Low-Inertia Cup Anemometers in Real Turbulence; a Reply, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 6, 523–526.
Garratt, J. R.: 1974, Note on a Paper by Frenzen: “The Observed Relation Between the Kolmogorov and von Kármań Constants in the Surface Boundary Layer”, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 6, 519–521.
Gill, G. L.: 1973, Comments on “Wind Speeds as Measured by Cup and Sonic Anemometers and Influenced by Tower Structure”, J. Appl. Meteorol., 12, 732–735.
Goltsman, M. I.: 1950, Foundations of the Methods of Micrometeorological Measurements, Gosizdat, Moscow, 360 pp. (in Russian).
Haugen, D. A., Kaimal, J. C., and Bradley, E. F.: 1971, An Experimental Study of Reynolds Stress and Heat Flux in the Atmospheric Surface Layer, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 97, 168–180.
Högström, U.: 1974, A Field Study of the Turbulent Fluxes of Heat, Water Vapour and Momentum at a “Typical” Agricultural Site, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 100, 624–639.
Hyson, P.: 1972, Cup Anemometer Response to Fluctuating Wind Speeds, J. Appl. Meteorol. 11, 843–848.
Izumi, Y. and Barad, M. L.: 1970, Wind Speeds as Measured by Cup and Sonic Anemometers and Influenced by Tower Structure, J. Appl. Meteorol. 9, 251–256.
Izumi, Y. and Barad, M. L.: 1973, Reply to Comments by G. Gill, J. Appl. Meteorol. 12, 735.
Kaimal, J. C., Wyngaard, J. C., Izumi, Y., and Coté, O. R.: 1972, Spectral Characteristics of Surface-Layer Turbulence, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 98, 563–589.
Kaimal, J. C.: 1973, Turbulence Spectra, Length Scales and Structure Parameters in the Stable Surface Layer, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 4, 289–309.
Kondo, J., Naito, G., and Fujinawa, Y.: 1971, Response of Cup Anemometer in Turbulence, J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan 49, 63–74.
Kondo, J. and Fujinawa, Y.: 1972, Errors in Estimation of Drag Coefficients for Sea Surface in Light Winds, J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan 50, 145–149.
MacCready, P. B.: 1966, Mean Wind Measurements in Turbulence, J. Appl. Meteorol. 5, 219–225.
Mazzarela, D. A.: 1972, An Inventory of Specifications for Wind Measuring Instruments, Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 53, 860–871.
Middleton, W. E. and Spilhaus, A. F.: 1953, Meteorological Instruments, University of Toronto Press, 286 pp.
Monin, A. S. and Yaglom, A. M.: 1971, Statistical Fluid Mechanics, vol. 1, The MIT Press, 769pp.
Moses, H.: 1968, ‘Meteorological Instruments for Use in the Atomic Energy Industry’, chapter 6 in Meteorology and Atomic Energy (ed. by D. H. Slade), U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.
Ower, E.: 1949, The Measurements of Air Flow, Chapman and Hall, London.
Ramachandran, S.: 1969, A Theoretical Study of Cup and Vane Anemometers, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 95, 163–180.
Sabinin, G.: 1923, Les anémometers à moulinet et la mesure à leur aide de la vitesse réele du vent, Bull. Moskovskogo Inst. Kosmicheskoi Fiziki (Bull. Moscow Inst. Space Phys.) 1, 196–214.
Sabinin, G. Kh.: 1937, Dependence of the Anemometer Readings on the Flow Structure, Zhurnal Geofiziki (J. Geophys., Moscow) 7, 164–176 (in Russian).
Sanuki, M.: 1952, Experiments of the Start and Stop of Windmill and Cup Anemometers With Particular Reference to their Over-Estimation Factors, Pap. Meteorol. Geophys. 3, 41–53.
Schrenk, O.: 1929, über die Trägheitsfehler der Schalenkreuz-Anemometers bei schwankender Windstärke, Zeitsch. Techn. Phys. 10, 57–66.
Wyngaard, J. C., Coté, O. R., and Izumi, Y.: 1971, Local Free Convection, Similarity, and the Budgets of Shear Stress and Heat Flux, J. Atmospheric Sci. 28, 1171–1182.
Wyngaard, J. C., Baumen, J. T., and Lynch, R. A.: 1974, ‘Cup Anemometer Dynamics’, in Flow: Its Measurement and Control in Science and Industry, vol. 1 (ed. by R. B. Dowdell), Instrument Society of America, pp. 701–708.
Yaglom, A. M.: 1954, On Allowing for the Inertia of Meteorological Instruments in a Turbulent Atmosphere, Trudy Geofiz. Ins. Akad. Nauk SSSR (Works of Geophys. Inst., Acad. Sci. USSR), 24 (151), 112–162 (in Russian).
Yaglom, A. M.: 1974, Data on Turbulence Characteristics in the Atmospheric Surface Layer, Izv. Acad. Sci. USSR, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics 10, 566–586 (pp. 341–352 of the English Edition).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaganov, E.I., Yaglom, A.M. Errors in wind-speed measurements by rotation anemometers. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 10, 15–34 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00218722
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00218722