Summary
The numerical density and frequency of perforated synapses in the molecular layer of rat parietal cortex have been determined using 4 procedures in an attempt to overcome problems associated with the size and complex three-dimensional shape of perforated synapses. The following procedures were compared: A, single-section analysis; B, adjacent-section analysis; C, semi-serial-section analysis; and D, complete serial-section analysis. All procedures made use of an unbiased counting rule.
Estimates of the numerical density of perforated synapses ranged from 0.06 to 0.27×109 mm-3, and that of all synapses (non-perforated and perforated) from 1.88 to 2.50×109 mm-3. The frequency of perforated synapses varied from 4.5 to 18.0%. Procedures B (adjacent-section analysis) and D (complete serial-section analysis), neither of which utilize assumptions regarding the shape of synapses, produced comparable results (numerical density of perforated synapses 0.19–0.27×109 mm-3, and of all synapses 2.24–2.45×109 mm-3; frequency of perforated synapses 8.6–10.9%). The frequency of perforated synapses appeared to be underestimated by procedure A (single section analysis; 4.5%) and overestimated by C (semi-serial section analysis; 18%).
It is concluded that adjacent-section analysis is the most efficient and effective procedure for determining the numerical density and frequency of complex particles, such as perforated synapses. There is, however, no significant difference in the performance of this procedure compared with that of single-section analysis, for determining the numerical density of synapses in general. Nevertheless, inherent problems of bias within the single-section procedure make the adjacent section method the procedure of choice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abercrombie M (1946) Estimation of nuclear population from microtome studies. Anat Rec 94:239–247
Bedi KS (1984) Effects of undernutrition on brain morphology: a critical review of methods and results. In: Jones DG (ed) Current topics in research on synapses. Vol 2. Alan R Liss, New York, pp 93–163
Bedi KS, Calverley RKS, Jones DG (1986) A comparison of the ‘Disector’ and ‘Unfolding methods’ to estimate the numerical density of synapses in the rat neocortex. Proc Anat Soc Great Britain and Ireland, Aberdeen, p 14
Calverley RKS, Bedi KS, Jones DG (1987) Estimation of the numerical density of synapses in rat neocortex. A comparison of the ‘disector’ with an ‘unfolding’ method. J Comp Neurol (in press)
Calverley RKS, Jones DG (1987) The morphology of perforated synapses in rat neocortex. Cell Tissue Res (in press)
Carlin RK, Siekevitz P (1983) Plasticity in the central nervous system: do synapses divide? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:3517–3521
Cruz-Orive L-M (1980) On the estimation of particle number. J Microsc 120:15–27
de Groot DMG, Bierman EPS (1983) The complex-shaped ‘perforated’ synapses, a problem in quantitative stereology of the brain. J Microsc 131:355–360
de Hoff RT, Rhines FN (1961) Determination of the number of particles per unit volume from measurements made on random plane sections: the general cylinder and ellipsoid. Trans Am Inst Mineral Met Engineers 221:975–996
Dyson SE, Jones DG (1984) Junction differentiation and splitting as a mechanism for modifying connectivity. Dev Brain Res 13:125–137
Gundersen HJG (1977) Notes on the estimation of the numerical density of arbitrary profiles: the edge effect. J Microsc 111:219–223
Gundersen HJG (1986) Stereology of arbitrary particles. A review of unbiased number and size estimators and the presentation of some new ones. J Microsc 143:3–45
Howard V, Reid S, Baddeley A, Boyde A (1985) Unbiased estimation of particle density in the tandem scanning reflected light microscope. J Microsc 138:203–212
Mayhew TM (1979) Stereological approach to the study of synapse morphometry with particular regard to estimating number in a volume and on a surface. J Neurocytol 8:121–138
Oorschot DE, Jones DG (1984) A quantitative ultrastructural study of the effects of phenylacetate on synaptic organisation in the developing rat cerebral cortex. Dev Neurosci 6:45–57
Peters A, Kaiserman-Abramof IR (1969) The small pyramidal neuron of the rat cerebral cortex. Z Zellforsch 100:487–506
Small SV (1968) Measurement of section thickness. In Bocciarelli DS (ed) Proc 4th European Congress on Electron Microscopy. Vol 1 Tipografia, Poliglotta Vaticana, Rome, pp 609–610
Sterio PC (1984) The unbiased estimation of the number and sizes of arbitrary particles using the disector. J Microsc 134:127–136
Underwood EE (1970) Quantitative Stereology. Addison-Wesley, Boston
Verwer RWH, de Groot DMG (1982) The effect of shape assumptions on the estimation of the numerical density of synapses from thin sections. Prog Brain Res 55:195–203
Vrensen G, Nunes-Cardozo J, Muller L, Van der Want J (1980) The presynaptic grid: a new approach. Brain Res 184:23–40
Weibel E (1979) Stereological Methods. Vol 1. Practical methods for biological morphometry. Academic Press, London
Weibel E (1980) Stereological Methods. Vol 2. Theoretical foundations. Academic Press, London
Williams MA (1977) Quantitative methods in biology. In Glauert AM (ed) Practical methods in electron microscopy, Part 2, Vol 6, North Holland Publishing Co, Amsterdam
Williams MA, Meek GA (1966) Studies on thickness variation in ultrathin sections for electron microscopy. J R Microsc Soc 85:337–352
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Calverley, R.K.S., Jones, D.G. Determination of the numerical density of perforated synapses in rat neocortex. Cell Tissue Res. 248, 399–407 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00218208
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00218208