Skip to main content
Log in

Counterfactuals

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article I offer an approach to counterfactuals based on a notion of objective probability. It is in the spirit of, though it does not fall squarely under, the metalinguistic model. Thus, it is not developed in terms of possible worlds, or notions parasitic on them (e.g., similarity). Its dominant features are rooted in objective probability and causal relevance (analyzed probabilistically), and thus it is not close in spirit to a maximal similarity or a minimal change approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chisholm, R.: 1949, ‘The Contrary-to-fact Conditional’, in Feigl & Sellars, Readings in Philosophical Analysis, Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.

  2. Goodman, Nelson: 1965, Fact, Fiction and Forecast, Bobbs-Merrill, 1955. 2nd edition.

  3. DowningP. B.: 1958/9, ‘Subjunctive Conditionals, Time Order and Causation’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society LIX, 125–40.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kvart, Igal: 1980, ‘Formal Semantics for Temporal Logic and Counterfactuals’, Logique et Analyse, March, 35–62.

  5. KvartIgal: 1982, ‘Quine and Modalities de re: A Way Out?’, Journal of Philosophy LXXIX, 295–328.

    Google Scholar 

  6. KvartIgal: 1986, A Theory of Counterfactuals, Hackett Pub. Co., Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kvart, Igal: (forthcoming), ‘Counterfactual Ambiguities, True Premises and Knowledge’, Synthese.

  8. Kvart, Igal: (forthcoming), ‘Causal Independence’, Philosophy of Science.

  9. Kvart, Igal: 1975, ‘Counterfactual Conditionals’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

  10. Kvart Igal: 1991, ‘Transitivity and Preemption of Causal Relevance’, Philosophical Studies, pp. 59–95.

  11. Kvart Igal: (forthcoming), ‘Some Positive Causal Impact’.

  12. Lewis, David: 1973, Counterfactuals, Harvard University Press.

  13. LewisDavid: 1979, ‘Counterfactual Dependence and Time's Arrow’, Noûs XIII, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lewis, David: 1981, ‘Ordering Semantics and Premise Semantics for Counterfactuals’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 10.

  15. PollockJohn: 1976, Subjunctive Reasoning, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stalnaker, Robert: 1968, ‘A Theory of Conditionals’, in Studies in Logical Theory, N. Rescher (ed.), Supplementary Monograph to the American Philosophical Quarterly.

  17. StalnakerRobert: 1981, ‘A Defense of Conditional Excluded Middle’, in Ifs W. L.Harper, R.Stalnaker and G.Pearce (eds.), Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kvart, I. Counterfactuals. Erkenntnis 36, 139–179 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00217472

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00217472

Keywords

Navigation