Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Defining stimulus and response: An examination of current procedures

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abelson, R.P. (1979). “Differences between belief and knowledge systems”, Cognitive Science 3: 355–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N.H. (1970). “An averaging model applied to the size-weight illusion”, Perception and Psychophysics 8: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N.H. (1974). “Cognitive algebra”, pp. 2–101 in L.Berkowitz, ed., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 7. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J.C. and Noma, E. (1978). Fundamentals of Scaling and Psychophysics. Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments. 2nd edn. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R.M. and Corrigan, B. (1974). “Linear models in decision making”, Psychological Bulletin 81: 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K.A. and Simon, H.A. (1980). “Verbal reports as data”, Psychological Review 87: 215–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzén, O. and Offenloch, K. (1969). “Evoked response correlates of psychophysical magnitude: estimates for tactile stimulation in man”, Experimental Brain Research 8: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, W.R., Hake, H.W. and Eriksen, C.W. (1956). “Operationism and the concept of perception”, Psychological Review 63: 149–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C.H. (1950). “Behaviour, perception, and the psychophysical methods”, Psychological Review 57: 108–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. and Secord, P.F. (1972). The Explanation of Social Behaviour. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landy, F.J. and Farr, J.L. (1980). “Performance rating”, Psychological Bulletin 87: 72–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S. and Slovic, P. (1971). “Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions”, Journal of Experimental Psychology 89: 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F.M. and Novick, M.R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R.D. (1959). Individual Choice Behaviour. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, B.D. (1977). Behaviourism and the Limits of Scientific Method. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R.E. and Wilson, T.D. (1977). “Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes”, Psychological Review 84: 231–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, G. (1980). “Measurement and effects of transference and countertransference in psychotherapy”, Göteborg Psychological Reports 10: No. 12.

  • Sarris, V. and Meineken, E. (1976). “Experimental test of two mathematical models applied to the size-weight illusion”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2: 295–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. (1969). “Sensation scales in the size-weight illusion”, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 10: 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. (1971a). “Three models for the analysis of subjective ratios”, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 12: 217–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. (1971b). “The new functionalism”, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 12: 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. (1980). “Mätning av terapieffekter”, pp. 140–157 in B.-A.Armelius, ed., Ger behandlingen resultat? Stockholm: Norstedts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. (1981a). “On the homogeneity of psychological processes”, Quality and Quantity 15: 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. (1981b). “Life situations and episodes as a basis for situational influence on action”, pp. 259–273 in D.Magnusson, ed., Toward a Psychology of Situations: An Interactional Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L. (1982). “Logical versus psychological necessity: a discussion of the role of common sense in psychology”, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 23: 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L., Svensson, E. and Persson, L.-O. (1979). “The measurement of mood”, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 20: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedslund, J. (1969). “Psychological diagnostics”, Psychological Bulletin 71: 237–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedslund, J. (1970). “Circular relation between understanding and logic”, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 11: 217–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedslund, J. (1978). “Bandura's theory of self-efficacy: a set of common sense theorems”, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 19: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedslund, J. (1980). “Analyzing the primary code: from empiricism to apriorism”, pp. 47–73 in D.R.Olson, ed., The Social Foundation of Language and Thought: Essays in Honor of Jerome S. Bruner. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E.R. and Miller, F.S. (1978). “Limits on perception of cognitive processes: a reply to Nisbett and Wilson”, Psychological Review 85: 355–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. (1977). “Component processes in analogical reasoning”, Psychological Review 84: 353–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S.S. and Galanter, E.H. (1957). “Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua”, Journal of Experimental Psychology 54: 377–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. and Zinnes, J.L. (1963). “Basic measurement theory”, pp. 1–76 in R.D.Luce, R.R.Bush and E.Galanter, eds., Handbook of Mathematical Psychology. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E.C. and Brunswik, E. (1935). “The organism and the causal texture of the environment”, Psychological Review 42: 43–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. (1969). “Intransitivity of preferences”, Psychological Review 76: 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valle, R.S. and King, M. (1978). Existential-Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wann, T., ed. (1964). Behaviourism and Phenomenology: Contrasting Bases for Modern Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P. (1980), “Limitations on verbal reports of internal events: a refutation of Nisbett and Wilson and of Bem”, Psychological Review 87: 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinnes, J.L. (1969). “Scaling”, Annual Review of Psychology 20: 447–478.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Göteborg, Sweden

    Lennart Sjöberg

Authors
  1. Lennart Sjöberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sjöberg, L. Defining stimulus and response: An examination of current procedures. Qual Quant 17, 369–386 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00216411

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00216411

Keywords

Search

Navigation