Skip to main content
Log in

Net tax incidence for urban public transit subsidies in New Zealand

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of policy changes in the funding of New Zealand public transit modes.

These changes, introduced in 1983, are evaluated in terms of the net incidence of public transit subsidy assistance, taking into account its source of funding and the income class of those commuters benefiting from the subsidy. The general conclusion is that the net incidence of subsidy assistance remains progressive (i.e., a transfer from high to low income commuters) following the introduction of shared funding on the predominant public transit modes (rail and bus), sourced from income tax (central government) and property tax (regional/local government). However, because of the predominance of medium to high income commuters on rail vis-a-vis bus and the traditional source of funding on these modes in terms of income tax (a progressive tax source) and property tax (a regressive tax source), the degree of progressivity previously associated with public transit subsidies has now substantially reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amos, P. & Starrs, M., 1984. “Public Transport Subsidies in Adelaide”. 9th Australian Transport Research Forum. Proceedings Papers, pp. 595–611.

  • Cervero, R., 1984. “Cost and performance effects of transit operating subsidies in the United States”. International Journal of Transport Economics, Vol. X (3): 379–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankena, M.W., 1973. “Income distributional effects of urban transit subsidies”. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 7 (3): 215–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, A., 1975. Urban Fares Policy. Saxon House.

  • Guria, J.C. & Gollin, A.E.A., 1985. “Influence of income and public transit accessibility on the modal choice behaviour of the New Zealand labour force”. International Journal of Transport Economics, Vol. XIII (3): 301–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwilliam, K. M., 1984. “Aims and effects of public financial support for passenger transport”. ECMT Round Table; No. 67, pp. 9–61.

  • Larner, T.C., 1984. “The distribution effect of bus subsidies in West Yorkshire”. Traffic Engineering and Control, 25(a): 429–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pucher, J., 1981. “Equity in transit finance”. Journal of the American Planning Association, No. 47: 387–407.

  • Pucher, J., 1983. “Who benefits from transit subsidies?: Recent evidence from six metropolitan areas”. Transportation Research, Vol. 1, 17A (1): 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The analysis and opinions expressed in this paper are the responsibility of the author alone and do not purport to represent the views of the Ministry of Transport.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guriai, J.C., Gollinz, A.E.A. Net tax incidence for urban public transit subsidies in New Zealand. Transportation 13, 319–328 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00215252

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00215252

Keywords

Navigation