Four big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) born and raised in captivity were trained using the Yes/No psychophysical method to report whether a virtual sonar target was at a standard distance or not. At threshold bats were able to detect a minimum range difference of 6 mm (a Δt of 36 μs).
Following threshold determinations, a click burst 1.8 ms long containing 5 pulses from the ruby tiger moth, Phragmatobia fuliginosa (Arctiidae), was presented randomly after each phantom echo. The sound energy of the click burst was -4 dB relative to that of the phantom echo. Clicks presented for the very first time could startle naive bats to different degrees depending on the individual.
The bats' performance deteriorated by as much as 4000% when the click burst started within a window of about 1.5 ms before the phantom echo (Fig. 4). Even when one of ten phantom echoes was preceded by a click burst, the range difference discrimination worsened by 200% (Fig. 9). Hence, clicks falling within the 1.5 ms time window seem to interfere with the bat's neural timing mechanism.
The clicks of arctiid moths appear to serve 3 functions: they can startle naive bats, interfere with range difference determinations, or they can signal the moth's distastefulness, as shown in earlier studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
- peSPL :
peak equivalent sound pressure level
- sd :
- FM :
- CF :
- EPROM :
erasable programmable read only memory
Andersen BB, Miller LA (1977) A portable ultrasonic detection system for recording bat cries in the field. J Mammal 58:226–229
Au WWL, Moore PWB (1988) Detection of complex echoes in noise by an echolocating dolphin. J Acoust Soc Am 83:662–668
Berkowitz A, Suga N (1989) Neural mechanisms of ranging are different in two species of bats. Hearing Res 41:255–264
Blest AD (1964) Protective display and sound production in some New World arctiid and ctenuchid moths. Zoologica. Scientific contributions of the New York Zoological Society, pp 161–181
Blest AD, Collett TS, Pye JD (1963) The generation of ultrasonic signals by a New World arctiid moth. Proc R Soc Lond B 158:196–207
Bodenhamer RD, Pollak GD (1981) Time and frequency domain processing in the inferior colliculus of echolocating bats. Hearing Res 5:317–355
Dunning DC (1968) Warning sounds of moths. Z Tierpsychol 25:129–138
Dunning DC, Roeder KD (1965) Moth sounds and the insect-catching behavior of bats. Science 147:173–174
Feng AS, Simmons JA, Kick SA (1978) Echo detection and target ranging neurons in the auditory system of the bat Eptesicus fuscus. Science 202:645–648
Fenton MB, Roeder KD (1974) The microtymbals of some Arctiidae. J Lepidopterists' Soc 28:205–211
Freeman PW (1981) Correspondence of food habits and morphology in insectivorous bats. J Mammal 62:166–173
Fullard JH (1979) Behavioral analyses of auditory sensitivity in Cycnia tenera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). J Comp Physiol 129:79–83
Fullard JH, Fenton MB (1977) Acoustic and behavioural analyses of sounds produced by some species of Nearctic Arctiidae (Lepidoptera). Can J Zool 55:1213–1224
Fullard JH, Fenton MB, Simmons JA (1979) Jamming bat echolocation: The clicks of arctiid moths. Can J Zool 57:647–649
Gellerman LW (1933) Chance disorders of alternating stimuli in visual discrimination experiments. J Genet Psychol 42:205–208
Green DM, Forrest TG (1989) Temporal gaps in noise and sinusiods. J Acoust Soc Am 86:961–970
Griffin DR (1958) Listening in the dark. Yale Univ Press, New Haven (reprinted 1974 Dover Publications, New York)
Miller LA (1983) How insects detect and avoid bats. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioral physiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 251–266
Møhl B, Surlykke A (1989) Detection of sonar signals in the presence of pulses of masking noise by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus. J Comp Physiol A 165:119–124
Moss CF (1988) Ontogeny of vocal signals in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus. In: Nachtigall PE, Moore PWB (eds) Animal sonar: processes and performance. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 115–120
O'Neill WE, Suga N (1982) Encoding of target-range information and its representation in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat. J Neurosci 2:17–31
Pollak GD (1988) Time is traded for intensity in the bat's auditory system. Hearing Res 36:107–124
Pollak GD, Marsh D, Bodenhamer RD, Souter H (1977) Characteristics of phasic-on neurons in the inferior colliculus of bats with observations relating to mechanisms of echo-ranging. J Neurophysiol 40:926–942
Rothschild M, Reichstein T, Euw J von, Aplin R, Harman RRM (1970) Toxic Lepidoptera. Toxicon 8:293–299
Roverud RC (1989) A gating mechanism for sound pattern recognition is correlated with the temporal structure of echolocation sounds in the rufous horseshoe bat. J Comp Physiol A 166:243–249
Roverud RC, Grinnell AD (1985a) Discrimination performance and echolocation signal integration requirements for target detection and distance determination in the CF/FM bat, Noctilio albiventris. J Comp Physiol A 156:447–456
Roverud RC, Grinnell AD (1985b) Echolocation sound features processed to provide distance information in the CF/FM bat, Noctilio albiventris: evidence for a gated time window utilizing both CF and FM components. J Comp Physiol A 156:457–469
Simmons JA, Grinnell AD (1988) The performance of echolocation: acoustic images percieved by echolocating bats. In: Nachtigall PE, Moore PWB (eds) Animal sonar: processes and performance. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 353–385
Simmons JA, Freedman EG, Stevenson SB, Chen L, Wohlgenant TJ (1989) Clutter interference and the integration time of echoes in the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus. J Acoust Soc Am 86:1318–1332
Simmons JA, Moss CF, Ferragamo M (1990) Convergence of temporal and spectral information into acoustic images of complex sonar targets preceived by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus. J Comp Physiol A 166:449–470
Stapells DR, Picton TW, Smith AD (1982) Normal hearing thresholds for clicks. J Acoust Soc Am 72:74–79
Suga N (1970) Echo-ranging neurons in the inferior colliculus of bats. Science 170:449–452
Sullivan WE (1982) Neural representation of target distance in auditory cortex of the echolocating bat Myotis lucifugus. J Neurophysiol 48:1011–1032
Surlykke A, Miller JA (1985) The influence of arctiid moth clicks on bat echolocation; Jamming or warning? J Comp Physiol A 156:831–843
Troest N, Møhl B (1986) The detection of phantom targets in noise by serotine bats; negative evidence for the coherent receiver. J Comp Physiol A 159:559–567
Urick RJ (1983) Principles of underwater sound 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York
Webster FA, Griffin DR (1962) The role of the flight membranes in insect capture by bats. Anim Behav 10:332–340
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, L.A. Arctiid moth clicks can degrade the accuracy of range difference discrimination in echolocating big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus . J Comp Physiol A 168, 571–579 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00215079
- Bat sonar
- Moth clicks
- Range difference discrimination