Conclusion
After substituting actual and real changes for proposed and nominal changes in budgetary and employment levels, it is clear that the size and scope of the federal Leviathon had not been reduced over 1982–83. It is also clear that the agencies which witnessed real budget cuts over this period were of minor importance in terms of the total U.S. budget. Future research on why only small agencies receive real budget cuts will provide us with a better understanding of the budgetary process.
There exists a strong distinction to be made between intended (proposed) and actual changes in government activity over time. On the one hand, research in the public choice area must recognize this distinction before deriving public policy implications from empirical data. On the other hand, research on how these differences between proposed and actual changes come about and their effect on voting patterns remains a useful issue in the public choice literature.
References
Laband, D.N. (1983). Federal budget cuts: Bureaucrats trim the meat, not the fat. Public Choice 41: 311–314.
Office of Management and Budget. (1983). Budget of the United States Government — Fiscal Year 1984. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Office of Management and Budget. Budget of the United States Government — Fiscal Year 1985. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office (1984).
U.S. Department of the Treasury. Final Monthly Treasury Statement of Receipts and Outlays of the United States Government (September 1983).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The views expressed are those of the author alone and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marlow, M.L. Federal budget cuts: Bureaucrats trim the meat, not the fat: Comment. Public Choice 45, 215–219 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00215068
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00215068