Skip to main content
Log in

Cadmium and zinc availability in soil irrigated with sludge containing a cationic conditioner

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tomato plants (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill, ‘Red Cherry Small’), grown in 15 cm diameter plastic pots with a standard greenhouse medium (1:1:1, by volume, soil:peat:sand) were irrigated for 15 weeks with liquid sewage sludge containing a liquid cationic conditioner (Petroset SB, Phillips Petroleum Company, Bartlesville, Oklahoma) to determine the effect of the conditioner on Cd and Zn availability. Half of the plants received 50 ml week−1 liquid digested sludge with no conditioner and half of the plants received 50 ml week−1 sludge containing 0.25 ml conditioner (200:1, by volume, sludge:conditioner). Plant height was measured weekly. Plants were harvested 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 weeks after sludge treatments began and separated into roots, shoots, and fruits for dry weight determination and Cd and Zn analyses. Soil and sludge crusts were sampled at the same times and analyzed for extractable concentrations of Cd and Zn.

Dry weights of plants grown with conditioned sludge were similar to those grown with nonconditioned sludge. Plants with conditioner flowered and fruited one and two weeks earlier, respectively, than plants without conditioned. Six weeks after treatments began, when the plants had grown to their greatest height, Cd concentrations in sludge crusts, soil, and roots receiving conditioner were 2.0, 1.5, and 2.1 times greater, respectively, than crusts, soil and roots not receiving conditioner. After the six weeks sampling time, Cd concentrations in crusts, soil, and roots receiving conditioned sludge were similar to those in crusts, soil, and roots receiving nonconditioned sludge. At the third-week sampling time, shoots of plants grown with conditioner had 2.6 times more Cd than shoots of plants grown without conditioner. Cadmium concentrations in shoots from both treatments were similar at later sampling dates. Cadmium content of fruits was the same for both treatments all sampling times. Zinc content of roots, shoots, fruits soil, and sludge crusts was no affected by the conditioner. Results showed that a cationic conditioner, added to sludge, increased the availability of Cd, but not of zn, for tomato plants until maximum height was reached.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gabriels, D. M., Moldenhauer, W. C., and Kirkham, D.: 1973, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 37, 634.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gardner, W. R. and Moldenhauer, W. C. (Co-chairmen of edit. comm.): 1975, Soil Conditioners. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Madison, Wis., 186 pp.

  3. Hedrick, R. M. and Mowry, D. T.: 1952, Soil Sci. 73, 427.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harrison, J. R., Goodson, J. B., Culp, G., Smith, J. E., Jr., and Dyer, J. C.: 1974, Process Design Manual for Sludge Treatment and Disposal, Chap. 6., ‘Sludge Conditioning’, EPA 625/1–74–006, U.S. Environ. Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Priesing, C. P.: 1962, Ind. Eng. Chem. 54, 38.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ruehrwein, R. A. and Ward, D. W.: 1952, Soil Sci. 73, 485.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schamp, N., Huylebroeck, J., and Sadones, M.: 1974, in W. R. Gardner and W. C. Moldenhauer (co-chairmen of edit. comm.), Soil Conditioners, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Madison, Wis., p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  8. MacIntire, W. H., Winterberg, S. H., Sterges, A. J., and Clements, L. S.: 1954, J. Agr. Food Chem. 2, 463.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anter, F. and De Boodt, M.: 1976, Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent 41, 287.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kirkham, M. B.: 1976, Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent 41, 267.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fuller, W. H., Gomness, N. C., and Sherwood, L. V.: 1953, Univ. Ariz. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 129, 257.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Letey, J.: 1975, in W. R. Gardner and W. C. Moldenhauer (co-chairmen of edit. comm.), Soil Conditioners, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Madison, Wisc., p. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kirkham, M. B.: 1977, Environ. Pollut. 13, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kirkham, M. B. and Emino, E. R.: 1976, Hort. Sci. 11, 157.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Isaac, R. A. and Kerber, J. D.: 1971, in L. M. Walsh (ed.), Instrumental Methods for Analysis of Soils and Plant Tissue, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Madison, Wis., p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lindsay, W. L.: 1972, Advan. Agron. 24, 147.

    Google Scholar 

  17. John, M. K. and VanLaerhoven, C. J.: 1976, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 15, 211.

    Google Scholar 

  18. King, W. G., Rodriguez, J. M., and Wai, C. M.: 1974, Anal. Chem. 46, 771.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hinesly, T. D., Braids, O. C., Dick, R. I., Jones, R. L., and Molina, J.-A. E.: 1974, ‘Agricultural Benefits and Environmental Changes Resulting from the Use of Digested Sludge on Field Crops’, EPA/530/SW-30d.1, U.S. Environ. Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., p. 375.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sposito, G., Holtzclaw, K. M., and Baham, J.: 1976, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 40, 691.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carr, C. E. and Greenland, D. J.: 1975, in W. R. Gardner and W. C. Moldenhauer (co-chairman of edit. comm.), Soil Conditioners, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Madison, Wis., p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  22. De Boodt, M.: 1975, in W. R. Gardner and W. C. Moldenhauer (co-chairmen of edit. comm.), Soil Conditioners, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Madison, Wis., p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zuckerman, L.S., Kirkham, M.B. Cadmium and zinc availability in soil irrigated with sludge containing a cationic conditioner. Water Air Soil Pollut 9, 467–473 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00213542

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00213542

Keywords

Navigation