Sublethal concentrations of mercury in river otters: Monitoring environmental contamination

  • R. S. Halbrook
  • J. H. Jenkins
  • P. B. Bush
  • N. D. Seabolt


Hair, muscle, and liver mercury concentrations were determined in river otter (Lutra canadensis) carcasses collected from the lower coastal plain and piedmont of Georgia. Mean muscle and hair mercury concentrations were greater (P<0.001) in otters from the lower coastal plain (4.42 and 24.25 mg/kg wet wt, respectively) compared to otters from the piedmont (1.48 and 15.24 mg/kg, respectively). Liver tissue from lower coastal plain otters averaged 7.53 mg/kg mercury. Mean fetus brain and muscle mercury concentrations were 1.03 and 1.58 mg/kg wet wt, respectively, and fetal muscle mercury concentrations were correlated (r=0.92) with maternal muscle mercury concentrations. Comparison of mercury concentrations found in Georgia otters to those associated with adverse effects in otter and mink (Mustela vison), indicate sublethal contamination with concentrations in some individuals approaching that observed in experimentally dosed individuals that developed clinical signs of mercurialism. Mercury concentrations in fish from the lower coastal plain approached or exceeded concentrations demonstrated to be toxic to experimentally dosed otters.


Waste Water Mercury Clinical Sign Water Pollution Liver Tissue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aulerich RJ, Ringer RK, Iwamoto S (1974) Effects of dietary mercury on mink. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 2:43–51Google Scholar
  2. Beck DL (1977) Pesticide and heavy metal residues in Louisiana river otter. MS Thesis. Texas A&M University. College Station, TX, 95 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Borg K (1975) Den svenska fauman och miljogifterna. In: Symposier vid jubileet svensk veterinarmedicin 200 ar. Skara, pp 19–25Google Scholar
  4. Borg K, Wanntorp H, Erne K, Hanko E (1966) Mercury poisoning in Swedish wildlife. J Appl Ecol 3:171–172Google Scholar
  5. —, —, —, — (1969) Alkyl mercury poisoning in terrestrial Swedish wildlife. Viltrevy 6:301–379Google Scholar
  6. Clark JD, Jenkins JH, Bush PB, Moser EB (1981) Pollution trends in river otter in Georgia. Proc Annu Conf Southeast Assoc Game Fish Comm 35:71–79Google Scholar
  7. Cumbie PM (1975a) Mercury accumulation in wildlife in the Southeast. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 148 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. — (1975b) Mercury levels in Georgia otter, mink and freshwater fish. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 14:193–196Google Scholar
  9. Cumbie PM, Jenkins JH (1974) Mercury accumulation in native mammals of the Southeast. Proc Annu Conf Southeast Assoc Game Fish Comm 28:639–648Google Scholar
  10. Duplaix N, Simon N (1976) World guide to mammals. Crown Publishers, Inc, NY, 283 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Erlinge S (1972) The situation of the otter population in Sweden. Viltrevy 8:379–397Google Scholar
  12. Fimreite N, Reynolds LM (1973) Mercury contamination of fish in northwestern Ontario. J Wildl Manage 37:62–68Google Scholar
  13. Friley CE, Jr (1949) Age determination, by use of the baculum, in the river otter, Lutra c. canadensis Schreber. J Mammal 30:102–110Google Scholar
  14. Georgia Water Quality Control Board (1971) Mercury pollution investigation in Georgia, 1970–1971, 110 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Halbrook RS, Jenkins JH, Bush PB, Seabolt ND (1981) Selected environmental contaminants in river otters (Lutra canadensis) of Georgia and their relationship to the possible decline of otters in North America. In: Chapman JA, Pursley D (eds). Worldwide furbearer conference proceedings. The Worldwide Furbearer Conference, Inc, Frostburg, MD, pp 1752–1762Google Scholar
  16. Halbrook RS, Jenkins JH (1988) Cesium-137 levels detected in Georgia otters. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 41:765–769Google Scholar
  17. Hamilton WJ, Eadie WR (1964) Reproduction in the otter, Lutra canadensis. J Mammal 45:242–252Google Scholar
  18. Hatch W, Ott W (1968) Determination of sub-microgram quantities of mercury in atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Anal Chem 40:2085–2087Google Scholar
  19. Jenkins JH (1983) The status and management of the river otter (Lutra canadensis) in North America. Acta Zool Fennica 174:233–235Google Scholar
  20. Jensen S, Johnels AG, Olsson M, Westermark T (1972) The avifauna of Sweden as indicators of environmental contamination with mercury and chlorinated hydrocarbons. Proc Int Ornitho Cong 15:455–464Google Scholar
  21. Khera KS (1973) Reproductive capability of male rats and mice treated with methyl mercury. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 24:167–177Google Scholar
  22. Knudsen GJ, Hale JB (1968) Food habits of otters in the Great Lakes region. J Wildl Manage 32:89–93Google Scholar
  23. Kreitzer JF, Heinz HG (1974) Effects of sublethal dosages of five pesticides and a polychlorinated biphenyl on avoidance response of coturnix quail chicks. Environ Pollut 6:21–29Google Scholar
  24. Kurland LT (1973) An appraisal of the epidemiology and toxicology of alkylmercury compounds. In: Miller MW, Clarkson TW (eds). Mercury, mercurials, and mercaptans. Charles Thomas, Springfield, IL, pp 23–55Google Scholar
  25. Lambou VW (1972) Problem of mercury emission into the environment of the United States. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report to the Working Party on Mercury, Sector Group on Unintended Occurrence of Chemicals in the Environment. OECD, Washington, DC, 81 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Lauhachinda V (1978) Life history of the river otter in Alabama with emphasis on food habits. PhD dissertation. Auburn Univ, Auburn, AL, 169 ppGoogle Scholar
  27. Mason CF, Last NI, Macdonald SM (1986) Mercury, cadmium, and lead in British otters. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 37:844–849Google Scholar
  28. McDaniel JE (1963) Otter population study. Proc Annu Conf Southeast Assoc Game Fish Comm 17:163–167Google Scholar
  29. Nelson N, Byerly TC, Kolbye AC, Kurland LT, Shapiro RE, Shibko SI, Strickel WH, Thompson JE, Van Den Berg LA, Weissler A (1971) Hazards of mercury. Environ Res 4:1–69Google Scholar
  30. O'Connon, D.J., and S.W. Nielsen. 1981. Environmental survey of methylmercury levels in wild mink (Mustela vison) and otter (Lutra canadensis) from the Northeastern United States and experimental pathology of methylmercurialism in the otter. In: Chapman JA, Pursley D (eds.), Worldwide furbearer conference proceedings, Worldwide Furbearer Conference, Inc, Frostburg, MD, pp 1728–1745Google Scholar
  31. Park E (1971) The world of the otter. JB Lippincott Co, NY, 159 ppGoogle Scholar
  32. Pillay LKS, Thomas CC Jr, Sondel JA, Hyche CM (1972) Mercury pollution of Lake Erie ecosystem. Environ Res 5:172–181Google Scholar
  33. Poole EL (1954) The otter—Pennsylvania's rarest furbearer. Penn Game News 25:4–9Google Scholar
  34. Ropek RM, Neely RK (1993) Mercury levels in Michigan river otters, Lutra canadensis. J Freshwater Ecol 8:141–147Google Scholar
  35. Sheffy TB, St. Amant JR (1982) Mercury burdens in furbearers in Wisconsin. J Wildl Manage 46:1117–1120Google Scholar
  36. Spyker JM, Sparber SB, Goldberg AM (1972) Subtle consequences of methylmercury exposure: Behavioral deviations in offspring of treated mothers. Science 177:621–623Google Scholar
  37. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1972) Mercury in fish (cold vapor technique). Washington, DC, 7 pp (mimeo)Google Scholar
  38. Uthe J, Armstrong F, Stainton M (1970) Mercury determination in fish samples by wet digestion and flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J Fish Res Board Can 27:805–811Google Scholar
  39. Warren HW, Delavault RE, Barakso J (1966) Some observations on the geochemistry of mercury as applied to prospecting. Econ Geol 61:1010–1028Google Scholar
  40. Wilson KA (1959) The otter in North Carolina. Proc. Southeastern Assoc Game Fish Comm 12:267–276Google Scholar
  41. Windom HL, Taylor FE, Waiters EM (1975) Possible influence of atmospheric transport on the total mercury content of southeastern Atlantic Continental Shelf surface waters. Deep-Sea Res 22:629–633Google Scholar
  42. Wobeser G, Nielsen NO, Schiefer B (1976) Mercury and mink II. Experimental methyl mercury intoxication. Can J Comp Med 40:34–45Google Scholar
  43. Wobeser G, Swift M (1976) Mercury poisoning in a wild mink. J Wildl Dis 12:335:340Google Scholar
  44. Wren CD (1985) Probable case of mercury poisoning in a wild otter, Lutra canadensis, in Northwestern Ontario. Can Field-Natural 99:112–114Google Scholar
  45. Wren CD, Stokes PM, Fischer KL (1986) Mercury levels in Ontario mink and otter relative to food levels and environmental acidification. Can J Zool 64:2854–2859Google Scholar
  46. Wrigley RE (1969) Ecological notes on the mammals of southern Quebec. Can Field-Nat 83:201–211Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. S. Halbrook
    • 1
  • J. H. Jenkins
    • 1
  • P. B. Bush
    • 2
  • N. D. Seabolt
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Forest ResourcesUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Extension Poultry Science DepartmentUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations