Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 173, Issue 3, pp 275–279 | Cite as

Hearing in honeybees: localization of the auditory sense organ

  • C. Dreller
  • W. H. Kirchner
Article

Abstract

Airborne sound signals emitted by dancing honeybees (Apis mellifera) contain information about the locations of food sources. Honeybees can perceive these near field sounds and rely on them to decode the messages of the dance language. The dance sound is characterized by rhythmical air particle movement of high velocity amplitudes. The aim of the present study was to identify the sensory structures used to detect near field sound signals. In an operant conditioning experiment, bees were trained to respond to sound. Ablation experiments with these trained bees revealed that neither mechanosensory hairs on the antennae or head nor bristle fields at the joints of the antenna, but Johnston's organ, a chordotonal organ in the pedicel of the antenna, is used to detect near field sound in honeybees.

Key words

Apis mellifera Auditory sense Near field sound Johnston's organ Dance language 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barth FG, Blickhahn R (1984) Mechanoreception. In: Bereiter-Hahn J, Matoltsy AG, Richards KS (eds) Biology of the integument. Vol. 1: Invertebrates. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 544–582Google Scholar
  2. Belton P (1961) The physiology of sound reception in insects. Proc Entomol Soc Ontario 92:20–26Google Scholar
  3. Belton P (1989) The structure and probable function of the internal cuticular parts of Johnston's organ in mosquitos (Aedes aegypti). Can J Zool 67:2625–2632Google Scholar
  4. Dreller C (1990) Verhaltensphysiologische Untersuchungen über die Wahrnehmung von Luftschall bei der Honigbiene, Apis mellifera. Diploma Thesis, Universität WürzburgGoogle Scholar
  5. Esch H (1961) Über die Schallerzeugung beim Werbetanz der Honigbiene. Z Vergl Physiol 45:1–11Google Scholar
  6. Esch H (1964) Beiträge zum Problem der Entfernungsweisung in den Schwänzeltänzen der Honigbiene. Z Vergl Physiol 48:534–546Google Scholar
  7. Es'kov EK (1975) Phonoreceptors of melliferous bees. Biofizika 20:646–651 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  8. Esslen J, Kaissling K-E (1976) Zahl und Verteilung antennaler Sensillen bei der Honigbiene (Apis mellifera L.) Zoomorphology 83:227–251Google Scholar
  9. Ewing AW (1978) The antenna of Drosophila as a ‘love song” receptor. Physiol Entomol 3:33–36Google Scholar
  10. Frisch K von (1965) Tanzsprache und Orientierung der Bienen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Görner P, Andrews P (1969) Trichobothrien, ein Ferntastsinnesorgan bei Webspinnen (Araneen). Z Vergl Physiol 64:301–317Google Scholar
  12. Heran H (1959) Wahrnehmung und Regelung der Flugeigengeschwindigkeit bei Apis mellifica L. Z Vergl Physiol 42:103–163Google Scholar
  13. Kirchner WH, Lindauer M, Michelsen A (1988) Honeybee dance communication: Acoustical indication of direction in round dances. Naturwissenschaften 75:629–630Google Scholar
  14. Kirchner WH, Dreller C, Towne WF (1991) Hearing in honeybees: operant conditioning and spontaneous reactions to airborne sound. J Comp Physiol A 168:85–89Google Scholar
  15. Manning A (1967) Antennae and sexual receptivity in Drosophila melanogaster females. Science 158:136–137Google Scholar
  16. Markl H (1962) Borstenfelder an den Gelenken als Schweresinnesorgane bei Ameisen und anderen Hymenopteren. Z Vergl Physiol 45:475–569Google Scholar
  17. Markl H, Tautz J (1975) The sensitivity of hair receptors in caterpillars of Barathra brassicae L. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) to particle movement in a sound field. J Comp Physiol 99:79–87Google Scholar
  18. Michelsen A, Kirchner WH, Lindauer M (1986) Sound and vibration signals in the dance language of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:207–212Google Scholar
  19. Michelsen A, Towne WF, Kirchner WH, Kryger P (1987) The acoustic near field of a dancing honeybee. J Comp Physiol A 161:633–643Google Scholar
  20. Michelsen A, Andersen BB, Storm J, Kirchner WH, Lindauer M (1992) How honeybees perceive communication dances, studied by means of a mechanical model. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:143–150Google Scholar
  21. Neese V (1965) Zur Funktion der Augenborsten bei der Honigbiene. Z Vergl Physiol 49:543–585Google Scholar
  22. Spangler HG (1991) Do honeybees encode distance information into wing vibrations of the waggle dance? J Insect Behav 4:15–20Google Scholar
  23. Snodgrass RE (1956) Anatomy of the honeybee. Comstock Publishing Associates Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Tischner H (1953) Über den Gehörsinn von Stechmücken. Acustica 3:335–343Google Scholar
  25. Towne WF, Kirchner WH (1989) Hearing in honeybees: detection of air particle oscillations. Science 244:686–688Google Scholar
  26. Waddington KD, Kirchner WH (1992) Acoustical and behavioral correlates of profitability of food sources in honey bee round dances. Ethology 92:1–6Google Scholar
  27. Wenner AM (1962) Sound production during the waggle dance of the honey bee. Anim Behav 10:79–95Google Scholar
  28. Wishart G, van Sickle GR, Riordan DF (1962) Orientation of the males of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) to sound. Can Entomol 94:613–626Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Dreller
    • 1
  • W. H. Kirchner
    • 1
  1. 1.Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften der Universität, Lehrstuhl für Verhaltensphysiologie und SoziobiologieWürzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations