Skip to main content
Log in

Theory discovery from data with mixed quantifiers

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Convergent realists desire scientific methods that converge reliably to informative, true theories over a wide range of theoretical possibilities. Much attention has been paid to the problem of induction from quantifier-free data. In this paper, we employ the techniques of formal learning theory and model theory to explore the reliable inference of theories from data containing alternating quantifiers. We obtain a hierarchy of inductive problems depending on the quantifier prefix complexity of the formulas that constitute the data, and we provide bounds relating the quantifier prefix complexity of the data to the quantifier prefix complexity of the theories that can be reliably inferred from such data without background knowledge. We also examine the question whether there are theories with mixed quantifiers that can be reliably inferred with closed, universal formulas in the data, but not without.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lenore and Manuel Blum. Towards a Mathematical Theory of Inductive Inference. Information and Control 28: 125–55, June 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Case and C. Smith. Anomaly Hierarchies of Mechanized Inductive Inference. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, pages 314–319. 1978.

  3. C. C. Chang and H. J. Keisler, Model Theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haim Gaifman and Marc Snir. Probabilities over Rich Languages, Testing and Randomness. Journal of Symbolic Logic 47: 495–548, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clark Glymour. Inductive Inference in the Limit. Erkenntnis 2: 23–31, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. David Haussler. Bias, Version Spaces and Valiant's Learning Framework. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Learning, pages 324–334. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, Ca., 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Kearns, M. Li, L. Pitt, and L. Valiant. Recent Results on Boolean Concept Learning. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Learning, pages 337–352. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, Ca., 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kevin T.Kelly and Clark Glymour. Convergence to the Truth and Nothing But the Truth. Philosophy of Science 56: 1989.

  9. Osherson, D. and Weinstein, S.. Identification in the Limit of First Order Structures. Journal of Philosophical Logic 15: 55–81, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Osherson, D., Stob, M., and Weinstein, S.. Systems that Learn. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Osherson, D. and Weinstein, S. Paradigms of Truth Detection. Journal of Philosophical Logic 18: 1–42, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Pitt and L. G. Valiant. Computational Limitations on Learning from Examples. Technical Report TR-05-86, Center for Research in Computing Technology, 1986.

  13. Ehud Y. Shapiro. Inductive Inference of Theories from Facts. Research Report 192, Yale University: Department of Computer Science, February, 1981.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, K.T., Glymour, C. Theory discovery from data with mixed quantifiers. J Philos Logic 19, 1–33 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00211184

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00211184

Keywords

Navigation