Skip to main content
Log in

1995 SAGES Postgraduate Course. I

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Do CV, Doyle WF, Pearson JM (1993) The misunderstood economics of lap surgery. In: In Vivo. The Business of Medicine. pp 1–7

  2. Goodwin J, Traverso LW (1995) A prospective cost and outcome comparison of inguinal hernia repairs: Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal versus open tension-free preperitoneal. Surg Endosc 9:981–983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Seus JD, Wood T (1994) Reaping maximum benefits from minimally invasive surgery. Health Care Mater Manag 21–25

  4. Traverso LW, Hargrave K (1995) A prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 169: 503–507

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Ellwood PM (1988) Outcomes management: a technology of patient experience. NEJM 318: 1549–1556

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davies AR, Doyle MAT, Lansky D, Rutt W, Stevic MO, Doyle JB (1994) Outcomes assessment in clinical settings: a consensus statement on principles and best practices in project management. J Quality Improvement 20: 6–16

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tarlov AR, Ware JE, Greenfield S, Welam EL, Perrin E, Zubkoff M (1989) The medical outcomes study: an application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA 262: 925–930

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guadagnoli E, McNeil BJ (1994) Outcomes research: hope for the future of the latest rage. Inquiry 31: 214–224

    Google Scholar 

  5. Donabedian A (1980) The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. Health Administration Press, Ann Harbor, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson IB, Cleary PD (1995) Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: a conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA 273: 59–65

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rienertsen JL (1993) Outcomes management and continuous quality improvement: the compass and the rudder. QRB (Quality Review Bulletin) 19: 5–7

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. ASPEN Board of Directors (1993) Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adults and pediatric patients. JPEN 17: 1SA-52SA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barsamian EM (1977) The rise and fall of internal mammary artery ligation in the treatment of angina pectoris and the lessons learned. In: Costs, Risks, and Benefits of Surgery. Oxford University Press, New York, p. 212

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chmura Kraemer H (1991) To increase power in randomized clinical trials without increasing sample size. Psychopharm Bull 27: 217–224

    Google Scholar 

  4. Committee of Principal Investigators (1978) A co-operative trial in the primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease using clofibrate. Br Heart J 40: 1069–1118

    Google Scholar 

  5. Freiman JA, Chalmers TC, Smith H, et al. (1978) The importance of beta, the type II error, and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized control trial: survey of 71 “negative” trials. N Engl J Med 299: 690–694

    Google Scholar 

  6. Maliakkal RJ, Blackburn GL, Willcutts HD, et al.(1992) Optimal design of clinical outcome studies in nutrition and cancer—future directions. JPEN 16: 112S–116S

    Google Scholar 

  7. Miao LL (1977) Gastric freezing—an example of the evaluation of medical therapy by randomized clinical trials. In: Costs, Risks, and Benefits of Surgery. Oxford University Press, New York, p 198

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mullen B, Mullen M (1990) Meta-analysis—an overview. Nutrition 6: 270–271

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nichols RL (1990) Bowel Preparation. In: Wilmore DW, Brennan MF, Harken AH, Holcroft JW, Meakins JL (eds) Care of the Surgical Patient. Scientific American, Inc., New York, Section 6, chapter 4, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Truelove SC, Wright R (1964) The controlled therapeutic trial in gastroenterology. Am J Digest Dis 9: 1–30

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Caper P (1974) The meaning of quality in medical care. N Engl J Med 291: 1136–1137

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berwick DM (1989) Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. N Engl J Med 320: 53–56

    Google Scholar 

  3. Showdown at Capitation Corral. American Medical News, August 15, 1994

Reference

  1. McSherry CK (1976) Quality assurance: the cost of utilization review and the educational value of medical audit in a university hospital. Surg 80: 122–129

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Ledet WP Jr (1990) Ambulatory cholecystectomy without disability. Arch Surg 125: 1434–1435

    Google Scholar 

  2. Saltzstein EC, Mercer LC, Peacock JB, et al. (1992) Outpatient open cholecystectomy. Surg Gyn Obst 174: 173–175

    Google Scholar 

  3. Armstrong PJ, Burgess RW (1990) Choice of incision and pain following gallbladder surgery. Br J Surg 77: 746–748

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cheslyn-Curtis S, Russell RCG (1991) New trends in gallstone management. Br J Surg 78: 143–149

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barkun JS, Barkun AN, Sampalis JS, et al. (1992) Randomised trial comparing laparoscopic versus mini-cholecystectomy. Lancet 340: 1116–1119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barkun AN, Barkun JS, Fried GM, Ghitulescu G, Steinmetz O, Pham C, Meakins JL, et al. (1994) Useful predictors of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Annals of Surgery 220: 32–39

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sackmann M, Delius M, Sauerbruch T, et al. (1988) Shock wave lithotripsy of gallbladder stones, the first 175 patients. NEJM 318: 393–397

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bass EB, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD (1993) Cost effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165: 466–471

    Google Scholar 

  9. Traverso LW, Hargrave K (1995) A prospective cost-analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 169: 503–506

    Google Scholar 

  10. McMahon AJ, Russell IT, Baxter JN, et al. (1994) Laparoscopic vs mini laparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial. Lancet 343: 135–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Steiner CA, Bass EB, Talamani MA (1994) Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland. NEJM 330: 403–408

    Google Scholar 

  12. Conseil d'Evaluation des technologies de la sante du Quebec (CETS) (1995) The introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Quebec: effects on intervention rates and resource utilization. CETS, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Steiner CA, Bass EB, Talamini MA, Pitt HA, Steinberg EP (1994) Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland. New Engl J Med 330: 403–408

    Google Scholar 

  2. Orlando R III, Russell JC, Lynch J, Mattie A (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a statewide experience. Arch Surg 128: 494–499

    Google Scholar 

  3. Legorreta AP, Silber JH, Constantino GN, Kohyliuski RW, Zatz SL (1993) Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA 270: 1429–1432

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bass EB, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD (1993) Cost-effectivenss of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165: 466–471

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Voyles CR (1993) The laparoscopic buck stops here! Am J Surg 165: 472–473

    Google Scholar 

  2. Voyles CR, Sanders DL, Hogan R (1994) Common bile duct evaluation in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 1050 cases later. Ann Surg 219: 744–752

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wherry DC, Rob CG, Marohn MR, et al. (1994) An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in medical treatment facilities of the Department of Defense. Ann Surg 220: 626–634

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Farrow HC, Fletcher DR, Jones RMcL (1993) The morbidity of surgical access: a study of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Aust NZ J Surg 63: 952–954

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hardy KJ, Miller H, Fletcher DR, Jones RMcL, Shulkes A, McNeil JJ (1994) An evaluation of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy. Med J Austr 160: 58–62

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fletcher DR (1993) Common duct calculi at laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a technique for management. Aust NZ J Surg 63: 710–714

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hardy KJ, Miller H, McNeil J, Shulkes A (1994) Measurement of surgical costs: a clinical analysis. Aust NZ J of Surg 64: 607–611

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marshall ID, Hailey D, Hirsch, Clark E, Menon D (1994) Introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Canada and Australia. Australian Institute of Health & Welfare, GPO Box 570, Canberra, ACT 2601

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fletcher, DR (1995) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy—what benefits have been achieved and at what cost? MJA (in press)

  7. Fletcher DR (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: role of preoperative and postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointestinal Endosc Clinics of North America 3: 249–259

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hockey RL, Thomson N Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Western Australia—1988–1993. University Department of Public Health, Western Australia and Epidemiology Branch Health Department Western Australia—unpublished observations.

  9. Gracie WA, Ransohoff DA (1982) The natural history of silent gallstones. N Engl J Med 307: 798–800

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sherman S, Ruffolo TA, Hawes RH, Lehman GA (1991) Complications of endoscopic sphinterotomy. A prospective series with emphases on increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and non-dilated bile ducts. Gastroenterology 101: 1068–1075

    Google Scholar 

  11. Van der Linden W, Edlund G (1981) Early vs delayed cholecystectomy: the effect of a change in management Br J Surg 68: 753–757

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carter DC (1988) Pancreatitis and the biliary tree: the continuing problem. Am J Surg 155: 10–17

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fletcher DR, Smith R, Hollinshead J, Stubbs R, Worthley C, MacLellan DG (1991) Assessing techniques of cholecystectomy—an example of the audit process at work. R.A.C.S. Bulletin 35–37

  14. Windsor JA, Vokes DE (1994) Early experience with minimally invasive surgery: a New Zealand audit. Aust NZ J Surg 64: 81–87

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fletcher DR (1993) Biliary injury at laparoscopic cholecystectomy: recognition and prevention. Aust NZ Surg 63: 673–677

    Google Scholar 

  16. Woods MS, Traverso LW, Rossi RL, Donohue JH, Hunter JG, Fletcher DR (1995) Characteristics of biliary tract injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional study. Surg Endosc (1995) (in press)

  17. Hanney RM, Alle KM, Cregan PC (1995) Major vascular injury and laparoscopy. Aust NZ J Surg (in press)

  18. McMahon RJ, Baxter JN, O'Dwyer BJ (1993) Preventing complications at laparoscopy. Br J Surg 80: 1593–1594

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Leitman IM, Fisher ML, McKinley MJ, et al. (1993) The evaluation and management of known or suspected stones of the common bile duct in the era of minimal access surgery. Surg Gyn Obstet 176: 527–533

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sarick B, Washington M, Ghazi A (1993) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in conjunction with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 7: 388–392

    Google Scholar 

  3. Graham SM, Flowers JL, Scott TR, et al. (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct stones. Ann Surg 218: 61–67

    Google Scholar 

  4. Franceshi D, Brandt C, Margolin D, et al. (1993) The management of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 59: 525–532

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frazee RC, Roberts J, Symmonds R, et al. (1993) Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic management of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Am J Surg 166: 702–706

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brodish RJ, Fink AS (1993) ERCP, cholangiography, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) opinion survey. Surg Endosc 7: 3–8

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vitale GC, Stephens G, Wieman TJ, Larson GM (1993) Use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 114: 806–814

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brooks DC, Becker JM, Connors PJ, Carr-Locke DL (1993) Management of bile leaks following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 7: 292–295

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barkun JS, Fried GM, Barkun AN, et al. (1993) Cholecystectomy without operative cholangiography. Implications for common bile duct injury and retained common bile duct stones. Ann Surg 218: 371–379

    Google Scholar 

  10. Traverso LW, Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, et al. (1993) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165: 581–586

    Google Scholar 

  11. Manoulian AV, Schmalz MJ, Geenen JE, et al. (1993) Endoscopic treatment of problems encountered after cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 39: 9–14

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pencev D, Brady PG, Pinkas H, Boulay J (1994) The role of ERCP in patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 89: 1523–1527

    Google Scholar 

  13. Freeman M and 18 Center MESH Study Group (1994) Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 84: 1653A

  14. Kozarek RA (1994) Endoscopic techniques in management of biliary tract injuries. Surg Clin North Am 74: 883–893

    Google Scholar 

  15. Woods MS, Shellito JL, Santoscoy GS, et al. (1994) Cystic duct leaks in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 168: 560–565

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, Patterson DJ, et al. (1994) Endoscopic treatment of biliary injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 40: 8–14

    Google Scholar 

  17. Davids PHP, Rauws EAJ, Coene PP, et al. (1992) Endoscopic stenting for post-operative biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 38: 2–18

    Google Scholar 

  18. Davids PHP, Tanka AKF, Rauws EAJ, et al. (1993) Benign biliary strictures: surgery or endoscopy? Ann Surg 217: 237–243

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bass EB, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD (1993) Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165: 466–471

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kelley JE, Barrus RG, Burns RP, et al. (1993) Safety, efficacy, cost, and morbidity of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 228 consecutive patients. Am Surg 59: 23–27

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mouwschenson PM (1993) Improving the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laproendosc Surg 3: 113–119

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kim-Deobald J, Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, et al. (1993) Prospective evaluation of costs of disposable accessories in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 39: 763–765

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Roush TS, Traverso LW (1995) Management and long-term follow-up of patients with positive cholangiograms during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 169: 484–487

    Google Scholar 

  2. Traverso LW, Hargrave K (1995) A prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 169: 503–507.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hunter JG (1992) Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration. Am J Surg 163: 53–58

    Google Scholar 

  4. Traverso LW, Hauptmann EM, Lynge DC (1993) Routine intraoperative cholangiography and its contribution to the selective cholangiographer. Am J Surg 167: 464–468

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Mirizzi PL (1932) La cholangiografia durante las operaciones de las vias biliares. Bol Soc Cir Buenos Aires 16: 1133

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hickens NF, Best RR, Hunt HB (1936) Cholangiography. Ann Surg 103: 210

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berci G, Steckel R (1973) Modern radiology in the operating room. Arch Surg 197: 577

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berci G, Hamlin J (1981) Operative biliary radiology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S, Nathanson LK, Pietrabissa A (1994) Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy—routine vs selective policy. Surg Endosc 8: 302–305

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stain S, Berci G (1994) Personal communication

  7. Cuschieri A, Berci G (1992) Laparoscopic cholangiography. Laparoscopic Biliary Surg 6: 116–132

    Google Scholar 

  8. Phillips EH, Berci G, Carroll B, et al. (1990) The importance of intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 56: 792–795

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sackier JM, Berci G, Paz-Partlow M (1991) Laparoscopic transcystic choledocholithotomy as an adjunct to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 57: 323–327

    Google Scholar 

  10. Berci G, Sackier JM, Paz-Partlow M (1991) Routine or selected intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg 161: 355–360

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bruhn E, Miller F, Hunter J (1991) Routine fluoroscopic cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an argument. Surg Endosc 5: 111–115

    Google Scholar 

  12. Berci G, Morgenstern L, Paz-Partlow M (1989) Intraoperative and post-operative biliary endoscopy (choledochoscopy): the cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 55: 267–272

    Google Scholar 

  13. Caputo L, Aitken D, Mackett M, Robles A (1992) Iatrogenic bile duct injuries—the real incidence and contributing factors—implications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 766–771

  14. Way L (1992) Editorial: Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 215: 195

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moossa AR, Easter DW, Van Sonnenberg E, Casola G, D'Agostino H (1992) Laparoscopic injuries to the bile duct. A cause for concern. Ann Surg 215: 203–208

    Google Scholar 

  16. Morgenstern L, Wong L, Berci G. (1992) Twelve hundred open cholecystectomies before the laparoscopic era: a standard for comparison. Arch Surg 127: 400–403

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pace B, Cosgrove J, Breuer B, Margolis I (1992) Intraoperative cholangiography revisited. Arch Surg 127: 448–450

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rossi RL, Schirmer WJ, Braasch JW, Sanders LB, Munson JL (1992) Laparoscopic bile duct injuries: risk factors, recognition, and repair. Arch Surg 127: 596–601

    Google Scholar 

  19. Woods M, Traverso LW, Kozarek R, Tsao J, Rossi R, Gough D, Donohue J (1994) Characteristics of biliary tract complications during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional study. Am J Surg 167: 27–33

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zucker RA, Bailey RW, Gadacz TR, Imbembo AL (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a plea for cautious enthusiasm. Am J Surg 161: 36–44

    Google Scholar 

  21. Morgenstern L, McGrath M, Paz-Partlow M, Berci G (1995) Continuing hazards of the learning curve in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg (in press)

  22. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RCG, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickel N (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy, complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastroint Endosc 37: 383

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fletcher D (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the role of pre- and postoperative ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy. GI Endosc Clinics of North America, 3: 249–261

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stiegmann G, Goff J, Mansour A, Pearlman N, Reveille RM, Norton L (1992) Precholecystectomy endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal is not superior to cholecystectomy, cholangiography, and common duct exploration. Am J Surg 163: 227

    Google Scholar 

  25. Franklin, Morris (1994) Personal communication

  26. Stain SC, Cohen H, Tsuishoysha M, Donovan AJ (1991) Choledocholithiasis: endoscopic sphincterotomy or common bile duct exploration. Ann Surg 213: 627

    Google Scholar 

  27. Berci G, Morgenstern L (1994) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones. A multi-institutional SAGES study. Surg Endosc 8: 1168–1175

    Google Scholar 

  28. Petelin JB (1991) Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Surg Lap Endo 1: 33–41

    Google Scholar 

  29. Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Pearlstein AR, Daykhovsky L, Fallas MJ (1992) Laparoscopic choledochoscopy and extraction of common bile duct stones. World J Surg 17: 22–28

    Google Scholar 

  30. Davidoff AM, Pappas TN, Murray EA, et al. (1992) Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 215: 196–202-

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

1995 SAGES Postgraduate Course. I. Surg Endosc 9, 1211–1248 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00210931

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00210931

Navigation