Abstract
Animals with a history of receiving psychomotor stimulants in a specific environment show enhanced activity when injected with saline and placed there. In the present study, a Pavlovian paradigm was used to compare the unconditioned and conditioned activity effects of (+)-amphetamine (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0 mg/kg), caffeine (0.1, 1.0, 10.0, and 30.0 mg/kg), and a saline group (n's=6–12). Rats experienced conditioning days with either drug or saline injected IP prior to a 60-min session in the activity monitor and the alternate saline or drug injected in the home cage following the session. On test days, all animals received saline in the activity monitors. Results revealed that amphetamine produced environment-specific conditioning in a dose-dependent manner; previous experience with 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0 but not 0.1 mg/kg in the activity monitor resulted in conditioned activity. A caffeine dose of 10.0 mg/kg produced stimulant effects on conditioning days and previous experience with the 1.0, 10.0, or 30.0 mg/kg dose in the activity monitor led to conditioned activity on test days. However, on test days the control groups as well as the 30.0 mg/kg experimental group showed significantly reduced activity as compared to the saline group. Thus, it appeared that caffeine produced hypoactivity 23 h after injection. Amphetamine produced conditioning in a dose-dependent manner, and the appearance of significant unconditioned activity during conditioning sessions was not necessary or sufficient to produce a conditioned effect. For caffeine there was some evidence of environment-specific conditioning, but it appears that between-group differences for caffeine may be accounted for by hypoactivity 23 h following injection.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anden NE, Jackson D (1975) Locomotor activity stimulation in rats produced by dopamine in the nucleus accumbens: Potentiation by caffeine. J Pharm Pharmacol 27:666–672
Beninger RJ, Hahn BL (1983) Pimozide blocks establishment but not expression of amphetamine-produced environment specific conditioning. Science 220:1304–1306
Beninger RJ, Herz RS (1986) Pimozide blocks establishment but not expression of cocaine-produced environment specific conditioning. Life Sci 38:1425–1431
Beninger RJ, Cooper TA, Mazurski EJ (1985) Automating the measurement of locomotor activity. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol 7:79–85
Browne RG, Segal DS (1977) Metabolic and experiential factors in the behavioral response to repeated amphetamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 6:545–552
Butcher RW, Sutherland EW (1962) Adenosine 3′-5′-phosphate in biological materials. J Biol Chem 237:1244–1250
Crowley TJ (1972) The reinforcers for drug abuse: Why people take drugs. Comp Psychiatry 13:51–62
Daly JW, Burns RF, Snyder SH (1981) Adenosine receptors in the central nervous system: Relationship to the central actions of methylxanthines. Life Sci 28:2083–2097
Eikelboom R, Stewart J (1982) Conditioning of drug-induced physiological responses. Psychol Rev 89:507–508
Isaacson RL, Yongue B, McClearn D (1978) Dopamine agonists: Their effects on locomotion and exploration. Behav Biol 23:163–179
Joyce EM, Koob G (1981) Amphetamine, scopolamine and caffeine induced locomotor activity following 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the mesolimbic dopamine system. Psychopharmacology 73:311–313
Katims JJ, Murphy KMM, Snyder SH (1983) Xanthine stimulants and adenosine. In: Creese I (ed) Stimulants: Neurochemical, behavioural and clinical perspectives. Raven, New York, pp 63–87
Kuczenski R (1983) Biochemical actions of amphetamine and other stimulants. In: Cresse I (ed) Stimulants: Neurochemical, behavioural and clinical perspectives. Raven, New York, pp 31–62
Modrow HE, Holloway FA, Carney JM (1981) Caffeine discrimination in the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 14:683–688
Pickens RW, Crowder WF (1967) Effects of CS-US interval on conditioning of drug response, with assessment of speed of conditioning. Psychopharmacologia 11:88–94
Post RM, Lockfeld A, Squillace KM, Contel NR (1981) Drug environment interaction: context dependency of cocaine induced behavioural sensitization. Life Sci 28:755–760
Ross S, Schnitzer SB (1963) Further support for a placebo effect in the rat. Psychol Rep 13:461–462
Schiff SR (1982) Conditioned dopaminergic activity. Biol Psychiatry 17:135–154
Scheel-Krüger J, Braestrup C, Nielson M, Golembiowska K, Mogilnicka E (1977) Cocaine: Discussion of the role of dopamine in the biochemical mechanism of action. In: Ellinwood EH, Kilbey MM (eds) Cocaine and other stimulants. Plenum, New York, pp 373–407
Sideroff SI, Jarvik ME (1980) Conditioned responses to a videotape showing beroin related stimuli. Int J Addict 15:529–536
Tatum AL, Seevers MH (1929) Experimental cocaine addiction. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 36:401–410
Vezina P, Stewart J (1984) Conditioning and place specific sensitization of increases in activity induced by morphine in the VTA. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 20:925–934
Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herz, R.S., Beninger, R.J. Comparison of the ability of (+)-amphetamine and caffeine to produce environment-specific conditioning. Psychopharmacology 92, 365–370 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00210845
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00210845