Skip to main content
Log in

Alternative interaction structures in square contingency tables having ordered classificatory variables

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goodman (1972) proposed several models for the analysis of the general I x I square tables with particular emphasis on social mobility data. We demonstrate in this paper, that most of his models can be reproduced by combinations of both new models proposed here and the various well known models that have received considerable attention in the literature. Our presentation here is both concise and simple to comprehend. The various models considered in this study are fitted to ten data sets that include the much analyzed 5×5 Danish and British Social mobility data sets. Results suggest that in some cases more parsimonious models than those considered earlier by various authors are possible for the explanations of the variations in the data analyzed in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartholomew, D.J. (1982). Stochastic Models for Social Processes (3rd edn). Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Y.M.M., Fienberg, S.E. & Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice, MIT Press.

  • Clogg, C.C. (1981). “Latent Structure Models of Mobility”, American Journal of Sociology 86: 836–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S.E. & Mason, W.M. (1979). “Identification and estimation for age-specific-cohort models in the analysis of discrete archival data”, in Schuessler, K.F. (ed.), Sociological Methodology. San Francisco: Fossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton, B. (1984). Models of Category Counts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D.H. (1981). “The analysis of twice classified data”, Proceedings of the American Statistical Association. 172–182.

  • Glass, D.V. (1954). Social Mobility in Britain. Glenco, Ill: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, J.H. (1980). Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A. (1969). “How to ransack social mobility tables and other kinds of crossclassification tables”, American Journal of Sociology 75: 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A. (1972). “Some multiplicative models for the analysis of cross-classified data”, in Le, Carn et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A. (1979a). “Multiplicative models for the analysis of occupational mobility tables and other kinds of cross-classification tables”, American Journal of Sociology 84: 804–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A. (1979b). “Simple models for the analysis of cross-classifications having ordered categories”, Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 537–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A. (1981). “Association models and the bivariate normal for contingency tables with ordered categories”, Biometrika 68: 347–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A. (1981). “Association models and canonical correlation in the analysis of crossclassifications having ordered categories”, Journal of the American Statistical Association 76: 320–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A. (1981). “Criteria for determining whether certain categories in a cross-classification table should be combined, with special reference to occupational categories in an occupational mobility table”, American Journal of Sociology 87: 612–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, M. & Brown, M.B. (1986). “Maximum likelihood methods for log-linear models when expected frequencies are subject to linear constraints”, Journal of the American Statistical Association 81: 477–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, S.J. (1974). The Analysis of Frequency Data. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, S.J. (1978). Analysis of Qualitative Data. Vol. 2, Academic Press.

  • Hauser, R.M. (1980). “Some exploratory methods for modelling mobility tables and other crossclassified data”, in Schuessler, K.F. (ed.), Sociological Methodology, San Francisco: Fossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, J.K. (1988). The Analysis of Categorical Data using GLIM-Wiley (forthcoming).

  • Scheuren, F.J. & Loch Oh, H. (1975). “A data analysis approach to fitting square tables”, Communications in Statistics 4: 595–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svalastoga, K. (1959). Prestige, Class and Mobility. London: William Heineman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton, G.J.G. (1978). The Analysis of Cross-Tabulated Data. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton, G.J.G. (1985). “A survey of loglinear models for ordinal variables in an I x J contingency table”, Guru Nanak Journal of Sociology 6: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton, G.J.G. & Sarlvik, B. (1981). “A loyalty-distance model for voting change”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 144: 247–259.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lawal, H.B., Upton, G.J.G. Alternative interaction structures in square contingency tables having ordered classificatory variables. Qual Quant 24, 107–127 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209547

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209547

Key words

Navigation