Skip to main content
Log in

Unfavorable results and their resolution in mandibular contouring surgery

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the development of mandibular contouring surgery, there have been many unfavorable results due to technical reasons. Those results include asymmetry, undercorrection, overcorrection, and an incorrect contour line. Over three years the authors have analyzed 19 cases of unfavorable results and found the following: (1) There have been 7 cases of undercorrection, 5 cases of asymmetry, 5 cases of incorrect contour line, and 2 cases of overcorrection. (2) The main technical errors that cause unfavorable results seem to be the simple straight cutting of mandible angles instead of curved cutting using multistaged curved ostectomy. (3) We suggest that the basic way to prevent unfavorable results in mandibular contouring surgery is to contour the mandible, including angle, body, and symphysis, as a whole by way of multistaged curved ostectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baek SM, Kim SS, Bindiger A: The prominent mandibular angle: Preoperative management, operative technique, and results in 42 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 83:272, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker JH, Hall-Craggs ECB: Changes in length of sarcomeres following tenotomy of the rat soleus muscle. Anat Rec 192:55, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  3. Converse JM: Deformities of the jaws. In: Converse JM (ed): Reconstructive Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gurney CE: Chronic bilateral benign hypertrophy of the masseter muscles. Am J Surg 73:137, 1947

    Google Scholar 

  5. Legg JW: Enlargement of the temporal and masseter muscles on both sides. Trans Pathol Soc (London) 31:361, 1880

    Google Scholar 

  6. Master F, Georgiade NG, Pickrell K: The surgical treatment of benign masseteric hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg 15:220, 1955

    Google Scholar 

  7. Maxwell LC, Carlson DS, McNamara JA, et al: Adaptation of the masseter muscles following alteration in length, with or without surgical detachment. Anat Rec 200:127, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  8. McCarthy JG, Kawamoto H, Grayson BH, et al: Surgery of the jaws. In: McCarthy JG (ed): Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders, 1990, p 1301

    Google Scholar 

  9. Riefkohl R, Georgiade GS, Georgiade NG: Masseter muscle hypertrophy. Ann Plast Surg 12:528, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tabary JC, Tabary C, Tardien C, et al: Physiological and structural changes in cat's soleus muscle due to immobilization at different lengths by plaster casts. J Physiol 224:231, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  11. Whitaker LA: Aesthetic contouring of the facial support system. Clin Plast Surg 16:815, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  12. Whitaker LA: Aesthetic augmentation of the posterior mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:268, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yang DB, Park CG: Mandibular contouring surgery for purely aesthetic reasons. Aesth Plast Surg 15:53, 1991

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, D.B., Song, H.S. & Park, C.G. Unfavorable results and their resolution in mandibular contouring surgery. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 19, 93–102 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209317

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209317

Key words

Navigation