Skip to main content
Log in

Random bladder biopsies and the risk of recurrent superficial bladder cancer: a prospective study in 1026 patients

  • Free Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We prospectively studied random bladder biopsies of normal-looking mucosa in 1026 unselected patients with primary superficial papillary transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder. In a univariate analysis, the risk for recurrent disease was only slightly higher in patients with an abnormal biopsy result, the 2-year actuarial risk for recurrent disease being 47.5% in these subjects vs 44.5% in patients with a normal biopsy result (P=0.09, log-rank test). However, after correction for other prognostic factors using the Cox proportional-hazards model, an abnormal biopsy result had no prognostic value additional to that of conventional histo-pathology of the tumour with regard to the risk for recurrent disease. Additional therapy after transurethral resection of the tumour (P<0.001), tumour stage (P<0.001), the number of bladder areas affected by tumour (P<0.01) and tumour multiplicity (P=0.09) had significant prognostic value. We conclude that random biopsies of normal-looking mucosa during transurethral resection of superficial papillary bladder tumours are of little additional prognostic value with respect to the risk for recurrent disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc [B] 34:187–192

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cutler SJ, Heney NM, Friedell GH (1982) Longitudinal study of patients with bladder cancer: factors associated with disease recurrence and progression. In: Bonney WW, Prout GR (eds) Bladder cancer. (AUA monograph series, vol 1). Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore/London, pp 35–46

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dalesio O, Schulman CC, Sylvester R, Pauw M de, Robinson M, Denis L, Smith P, Viggiano G, the members of the EORTC, GU Tract Cancer Cooperative Group (1983) Prognostic factors in superficial bladder tumors. A study of the EORTC, GU group. J Urol 129:730–733

    Google Scholar 

  4. Flamm J, Dona S (1989) The significance of bladder quadrant biopsies in patients with primary superficial bladder cancer. Eur Urol 16:81–85

    Google Scholar 

  5. Flamm J, Havelec L (1990) Factors affecting survival in primary superficial bladder cancer. Eur Urol 17:113–118

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haaff EO, Dresner SM, Ratliff TL, Catalona WJ (1986) Two courses of intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol 136:820–824

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heney NM, Nocks BN, Daly JJ, Prout GR Jr, Newall JB, Griffin PP, Perrone TL, Szyfelbein WA (1982) Ta and T1 bladder cancer: location, recurrence and progression. Br J Urol 54:152–157

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heney NM, Ahmed S, Flanagan MJ, Frable W, Corder MP, Hafermann MD, Hawkins IR, for the National Bladder Cancer Collaborative Group (1983) Superficial bladder cancer: progression and recurrence. J Urol 130:1083–1086

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hermanek P, Sobin LH (1987) TNM classification of malignant tumors, International Union Against Cancer, 4th fully revised edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Herr HW (1991) Progression of stage T1 bladder tumors after intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin. J Urol 145:40–44

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huland H, Kloppel G, Otto U, Droese M (1984) The value of histologic grading and staging, random biopsies, tumor and bladder mucosa blood group antigens in predicting progression of superficial bladder cancer. Eur Urol 10:28–31

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kurth KH, Denis L, Cheuvart B, Sylvester R, Pauw M de, the members of the EORTC-GU Group (1990) Risk groups for tumor invasion and death due to malignant disease in superficial TCC Ta/T1 of the bladder (abstract 7). Eur Urol 18 [Suppl 1]:4

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lipponen PK, Collan Y, Eskelinen MJ, Pesonen E, Sotarauta M (1990) Volume corrected mitotic index (M/V index) in human bladder cancer: relation to histological grade (WHO), clinical stage (UICC) and prognosis. Scand J Urol Nephrol 24:39–45

    Google Scholar 

  14. Loening S, Narayana A, Yoder L, Slymen D, Penick G, Clup D (1980) Analysis of bladder tumor recurrence in 178 patients. Urology 16:137–141

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lutzeyer W, Rübben H, Dahm H (1982) Prognostic parameters in superficial bladder cancer: an analysis of 315 cases. J Urol 127:250–252

    Google Scholar 

  16. Malmstrom PU, Norlen BJ, Andersson B, Busch C (1989) Combination of blood group ABH antigen status and DNA ploidy as independent prognostic factor in transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Br J Urol 64:49–55

    Google Scholar 

  17. Morgan JDT, Bowsher W, Griffiths DFR, Matthews PN (1991) Rationalisation of follow-up in patients with non-invasive bladder tumors. A preliminary report. Br J Urol 67:158–161

    Google Scholar 

  18. Narayana AS, Loening SA, Slymen DJ, Culp DA (1983) Bladder cancer, factors affecting survival. J Urol 130:56–60

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ooms ECM, Anderson WAD, Alons CL, Boon ME, Veldhuizen RW (1983) Analysis of the performance of pathologists in the grading of bladder tumors. Hum Pathol 14:140–143

    Google Scholar 

  20. Parmar MKB, Freedman LS, Hargreave TB; Tolley DA (1989) Prognostic factors for recurrence and follow-up policies in the treatment of superficial bladder cancer: report from the British Medical Research Councel Subgroup on Superficial Bladder Cancer (Urological Cancer Working Party). J Urol 142:284–288

    Google Scholar 

  21. Richards B, Parmar MBK, Anderson CK, Ansell ID, Grigor K, Hall RR, Morley AR, Mostofi FK, Risdon RA, Uscinska BM, the MRC Superdicial Bladder Cancer Subgroup (1991) Interpretation of biopsies of “normal” urothelium in patients with superficial bladder cancer. Br J Urol 67:369–375

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smith G, Elton RA, Beynon LL, Newsam JE, Chisholm GD, Hargreave TB (1983) Prognostic significance of biopsy results of normal-looking mucosa in cases of superficial bladder cancer. Br J Urol 55:665–669

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stephenson WT, Holmes FF, Noble MJ, Gerald KB (1990) Analysis of bladder carcinoma by subsite. Cancer 66:1630–1635

    Google Scholar 

  24. Takashi M, Murase T, Mizuno S, Hamajima N, Ohno Y (1987) Multivariate evaluation of prognostic determinants in bladder cancer patients. Urol Int 42:368–374

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wallace DMA, Hindmarsh JR, Webb JN, Busuttil A, Hardgreave TB, Newsam JE, Chisholm GD (1979) The role of multiple mucosal biopsies in the management of patients with bladder cancer. Br J Urol 51:535–540

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Additional information

This study was financially supported by three regional Dutch comprehensive cancer centres: IKO, IKZ, and IKA/stedendriehoek Twente

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Witjes, J.A., Kiemeney, L.A.L.M., Verbeek, A.L.M. et al. Random bladder biopsies and the risk of recurrent superficial bladder cancer: a prospective study in 1026 patients. World J Urol 10, 231–234 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208916

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208916

Keywords

Navigation