Skip to main content
Log in

On V-V compounds in Chinese

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study of resultative V-V compounds in Chinese, it is shown that only certain theta-grid patterns are allowed. The restrictions on theta assignment are shown to follow automatically from standard Case theory and three other independently motivated assumptions of current Government-Binding Theory: theta-identification (Higginbotham 1985), a structured theta-grid (Grimshaw 1989) and head-feature percolation. Given the assumption that theta roles are assigned hierarchically, these theoretical devices interact so as to allow all well-formed V-V compounds while excluding all impossible compounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, M.: 1988, Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N: 1986a, Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N: 1986b, Barriers, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Déchaine, R.-M.: 1988, ‘V-movement Types in Haitian’, paper presented at the 2nd Niger-Congo Syntax and Semantics Workshop, MIT.

  • Di Sciullo, A. M. and E.. Williams: 1987, On the Definition of Word, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D. R.: Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague's PTQ, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

  • Dowty, D. R. et al.: 1981, Introduction to Montague Semantics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, J.: 1987, ‘Psych Verbs and the Structure of Argument Structure’, ms., Brandeis University, Waltham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, J.: in press, Argument Structure, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

  • Grimshaw, J. and A. Mester: 1988, ‘Light Verbs and θ-Marking’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 205–182.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J.: 1985, ‘On Semantics’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.-T. J.: 1982, Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, PhD. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R.: 1972, Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, B. et al.: 1978, ‘Serial Verbs in the Creole Languages,’ Amsterdam Creole Studies II, Universiteit van Amsterdam, pp. 125–159.

  • Lefebvre, C.: 1988, ‘Take Serial Verb Constructions: Please’, paper presented at the 2nd Niger-Congo Syntax and Semantics Workshop, MIT.

  • Li, C. N. and S. A. Thompson: 1981, Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y.-F.: 1987, ‘Theta-roles and Theta-operations’, unpublished ms., MIT, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y.-F.: to appear, ‘On Deriving Serial-verb Constructions’, in C. Lefebvre (ed.), The Proceedings of the MIT Conference on Serial Verbs, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indiana.

  • Li, Y.-H.: 1985, Abstract Case in Chinese, PhD. dissertation, University of Southern California, California; revised version in press, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, R.: 1983, ‘Argument Linking and Compounds in English’, Linguistic Inquiry 14, 251–285.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lü, S.-X.: 1984, Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci, Commercial Press, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsao, F.-F.: 1987, ‘On the So-called “Verb-copying” Construction in Chinese’, JCLTA XXII, No. 2, 13–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L.: 1947, Zhongguo Xiandai Yufa, Commercial Press, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.: 1981, ‘Argument Structure and Morphology’, The Linguistic Review 1, 81–114.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article began as a term paper for my first-year semantics course. I am grateful to Mark Baker, Noam Chomsky, San Duanmu, Ken Hale, Jim Higginbotham, Richard Larson, and Wayne O'Neil for their comments on various versions of that paper. I am also indebted to two NLLT reviewers, whose suggestions and criticisms have helped make the arguments in the paper more precise. But most of all, my thanks go to Jane Grimshaw, who was the first to point out to me that a modified version of the sketchy term paper could be good enough for print. Without her insightful comments, encouragement, and patience, this article would never have been able to appear in NLLT or anywhere else. As always, the author is responsible for all mistakes in the article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Y. On V-V compounds in Chinese. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 8, 177–207 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208523

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208523

Keywords

Navigation