Skip to main content
Log in

Overcoming barriers to the live arts: Can the media compensate?

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • American Symphony Orchestra League. Comparative Statistical Report: Urban Orchestras 1984–85 Season. Unpublished data.

  • Andreason, Alan R. and Belk, Russell W. “Predictors Of Attendance At The Performing Arts.rd Journal of Consumer Research, 7, (1980), pp. 112–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, William and Brwen, William. Performing Arts: The Economic Dilemma. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter. “The Work Of Art In The Age Of Mechanical Reproduction.” in Gerald Mast and Marshall Cohen, eds. Film Theory and Criticism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Judith R., and Quets, Gail A. The Geography Of Arts Participation: Report On The 1982 And 1985 Surveys Of Public Participation in the Arts. Washington, D.C.: National Endowment for the Arts, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul, Useem, Michael, & Brown, Paula. Audience Studies Of Performing Arts And Museums: A Critical Review. Washington D.C.: National Endowment for the Arts, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gapinski, J.H. “The Lively Arts As Substitutes For The Lively Arts” The American Economic Review, 76, (1986) 2, pp. 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, Robert. “Theater Facts 86.” American Theater, (April, 1987), pp. 20–27.

  • Hoover, Stuart. Mass Media Religion. Newbury Park, CA.: Sage Publications, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, H. The American Jazz Audience. Washington D.C.: National Jazz Service Organization, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intriligator, M. D. Econometric Models, Techniques And Applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netzer, D. The Subsidized Muse. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • PBS Reports (monthly) Washington, D.C.: Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

  • Robinson, John P., Keegan, Carol A., Karth, Marcia, and Triplett, Timothy A. Survey Of Public Participation In The Arts: 1985, Vol. I. Baltimore, MD: Project Report, University of Maryland Survey Research Center, March, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, John P., Keegan, Carol A., Hanford, Terry, & Triplett, Timothy A. Public Participation In The Arts. final Report Of The 1982 Survey. Baltimore: University of Maryland Survey Research Center, January, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R. The Measurement Of Consumers' Expenditure And Behavior In the United Kingdom, 1920–1938. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Commerce Department, Bureau of the Census. Census of Business. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Commerce Department. Special Tabulation for the National Endowment for the Arts, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, D., Schechter, R., and Contractor, N. Public Participaion In The Arts Via The Media. Washington, D.C.: National Endowment for the Arts, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, J. Public Participation In The Arts. Demands And Barriers. Washington, D.C.: National Endowment for the Arts, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waterman, D., Schechter, R. & Contractor, N.S. Overcoming barriers to the live arts: Can the media compensate?. J Cult Econ 15, 19–40 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208444

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208444

Keywords

Navigation