Skip to main content
Log in

Aesthetic otoplasty: the key point

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Various techniques have been used to correct prominent ears. This deformity is caused by the lack of formation of the natural fold along the antihelix, a hypertrophied concha or a combination of both. The authors present a simplified method of auriculo-plasty. The key point of the operation described in this paper is an incision on the upper part of the tail to the lower end of the antitragus in order to break the strongest point where the helix, antihelix and antitragus join [9]; also, anterior scratching of the ear cartilage along the line of the future antihelix and superior crus, as suggested by Stenstrom [12]. Only a single Vicryl stitch is used to transfix the fold at the antihelix tail, bending the scapha over the conchal cartilage to make the lobule fall into place. The results are satisfactory, with a normal looking antihelical fold. The ears should also feel normal and should not appear to have been operated on.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Becker OJ (1952) Correction of the protruding deformed ear. Br J Plast Surg 5:187

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chongchet V (1963) A method of antihelix reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 16:268

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cloutier AM (1961) Correction of outstanding ears. Plast Reconstr Surg 28:421

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ely ET (1881) An operation for prominence of the auricles. Arch Otol 10:97

    Google Scholar 

  5. Farina et al (1962) Otoplasty. Br J Plast Surg 15:194

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gibson TH, Davis WB (1958) The distortion of the autogenous cartilage grafts: its cause and prevention. Br J Plast Surg 10:257

    Google Scholar 

  7. Luckett WH (1910) A new operation for prominent ears based on the anatomy of the deformity. Surg Gynecol Obstet 10:635

    Google Scholar 

  8. MacGregor FC (1978) Ear deformities: social and psychological implications. Clin Plast Surg 5:3

    Google Scholar 

  9. Milojevic B (1981) Aesthetic otoplasty: a new technique. Aesth Plast Surg 5:199

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mustardé JC (1963) The correction of prominent ears using simple mattress sutures. Br J Plast Surg 16:170

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nordzell B (1965) A new method for correction of protruding ears. Acta Chir Scand 129:317–324

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stenstrom SJ (1963) “Natural” technique for correction of congenitally prominent ears. Plast Reconstr Surg 32:509

    Google Scholar 

  13. Webster GV (1969) The tail as a key to otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 44:5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sainz Arregui, J., Gaviria, R., San Sebastian, R. et al. Aesthetic otoplasty: the key point. Eur J Plast Surg 13, 258–262 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208327

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208327

Key words

Navigation