Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sutureless colonic anastomoses

  • Aktuelle Operationstechniken
  • Published:
Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. BAR Investigational Group (1989) Clinical evaluation of the Valtrac® biofragmentable anastomosis ring. A multicenter, multinational, prospective randomized study. Ann Surg

  2. Beart RW Jr, Kelly KA (1981) Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses. Am J Surg 141:143–147

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cahill CJ, Betzler M, Gruwez JA, Jeekel J, Patel JC, Zederfeldt B (1989) Sutureless large bowel anastomosis. European experience with the biofragmentable anastomosis ring. Br J Surg 76:344–347

    Google Scholar 

  4. Conolly WB, Hunt TK, Cafferata HT, Dunphy JE, Zederfeldt B (1969) Clinical comparison of surgical wounds closed by suture and adhesion tapes. Am J Surg 117:318

    Google Scholar 

  5. Denans FN (1826) Nouveau procédé pour la quérision des plaies des intestins. Recueil de la Société Royal de Médicine de Marseille (Séance de 24 fev 1826). Tome I: Impremerie d'Archard, Marseille 1827:127–131

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elek SD (1956) Experimental staphylococcal infections in the skin of man. Am NY Acad Sci 65:85

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, Kearny G (1980) Anastomotic integrity after operation for large bowel cancer. A multicenter study. Br Med J 281:411–414

    Google Scholar 

  8. Galetti G (1986) From conventional suturing to sutureless anastomoses in general surgery. In: Schlag G, Redl H (eds) Fibrin sealant in operative medicine, vol 6. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 165–172

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goligher JC, Graham NG, de Dombal FT (1970) Anastomotic dehiscence after anterior resection of rectum and sigmoid. Br J Surg 57:109–118

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harder F, Vogelbach P (1988) Single-layer end-on continuous suture of colonic anastomoses. Am J Surg 155:611–614

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hardy Tg Jr, Pace WG, Maney JW, Katz AR, Kaganov AL (1985) A biofragmentable ring for suturcless bowel anastomosis. An experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum 28:484–490

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hardy TG Jr, Aguilar PS, Stewart WRC, Katz AR, Maney JW, Costanzo JT, Pace WG (1987) Initial clinical experience with a biofragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 30:55–61

    Google Scholar 

  13. Högström H, Haglund U (1985) Postoperative decrease in suture holding capacity in laparotomy wounds and anastomoses. Acta Chir Scand 151:533–535

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jex RK, van Heerden JA, Wolf BG, Ready RL, Ilstrup DM (1987) Gastrointestinal anastomoses. Factors affecting early complications. Ann Surg 206:138–141

    Google Scholar 

  15. Musson K, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B (1983) Breaking strength of small intestinal anastomoses. Am J Surg 145:800–803

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lembert A (1826) Memoire sur l'entérorrhaphie avec la description d'un procédé nouveau pour pratiquer cette operation. Chir Rep Gen Anal Physiol Pathol 2:100–107

    Google Scholar 

  17. Murphy JB (1892) Cholecysto-intestinal, gastrointestinal, entero-intestinal anastomosis, and approximation without sutures. Med Rec 42:665–676

    Google Scholar 

  18. Senn N (1893) Enterorraphy: its history, technique and present status. JAMA 21:215–235

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zederfeldt, B., Jiborn, H. & Ekelund, G. Sutureless colonic anastomoses. Langenbecks Arch Chir 375, 181–185 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00206814

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00206814

Keywords

Navigation