Abstract
The perspective image of an obliquely inclined textured surface exhibits shape and density distortions of texture elements which allow a human observer to estimate the inclination angle of the surface. However, it has been known since the work of Gibson (1950) that, in the absence of other cues, humans tend to underestimate the slant angle of the surface, particularly when the texture is perceived as being “irregular.” The perspective distortions which affect texture elements also shift the projected spatial frequencies of the texture in systematic ways. Using a suitable local spectral filter to measure these frequency gradients, the inclination angle of the surface may be estimated. A computational model has been developed which performs this task using distributions of outputs from filters found to be a good description of simple-cell receptive fields. However, for “irregular” textures the filter output distributions are more like those of “regular” textures at shallower angles of slant, leading the computational algorithm to underestimate the slant angle. This behavioral similarity between human and algorithm suggests the possibility that a similar visual computation is performed in cortex.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adelson EH, Bergen JR (1985) Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am A 2:284–299
Bajcsy R, Lieberman L (1976) Texture gradient as a depth cue. Comput Graph Image Process 5:52–67
Braunstein ML (1968) Motion and texture as sources of slant information. J Exp Psychol 78:247–253
Brodatz P (1966) Textures, a photographic album for artists and designers. Dover, New York
Campbell FW, Robson JG (1968) Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. J Physiol (London) 197:551–566
Clark WC, Smith AH, Rabe A (1956) The interaction of surface texture, outline gradient and ground in the perception of slant. Can J Psychol 10:1–8
Daugman JG (1980) Two-dimensional spectral analysis of cortical receptive field profiles. Vision Res 20:847–856
Daugman JG (1985) Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensioanl visual cortical filters. J Opt Soc Am A 2:1160–1169
Enroth-Cugell C, Robson JG (1966) The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. J Physiol (London) 187:517–552
Epstein W, Park J (1964) Examination of Gibson's psychophysical hypothesis. Psychol Bull 62:180–196
Erickson RP (1963) Sensory neural patterns and gustation. In: Zotterman Y (eds) Olfaction and taste. Macmillan, New York, pp 205–213
Erickson RP (1974) Parallel “population” neural coding in feature extraction. In: Schmitt FO, Worden FG (eds) The neurosciences: third study program. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass, pp 155–169
Flock H, Moscatelli A (1964) Variables of surface texture and accuracy of space perceptions. Percep Motor Skills 19:327–334
Gabor D (1946) Theory of communication. J Inst Electr Eng (London) 93:429–457
Gibson JJ (1950) The perception of visual surfaces. Am J Psychol 63:367–384
Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Gibson JJ, Cornsweet J (1952) The perceived slant of visual surfaces — optical and geographical. J Exp Psychol 44:11–15
Gruber HE, Clark WC (1956) Perception of slanted surface. Percep Motor Skills 6:97–106
Hopfield JJ, Tank DW (1986) Computing with neural circuits: a model. Science 233:625–633
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1959) Receptive fields of single neurons in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol (London) 148:574–591
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1962) Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol (London) 160:106–154
Jones JP, Palmer LA (1987a) The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 58:1187–1211
Jones JP, Palmer LA (1987b) An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 58:1233–1258
Jones JP, Stepnoski A, Palmer LA (1987) The two-dimensional spectral structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 58:1212–1232
MacKay DM (1981) Strife over visual cortical function. Nature 289:117–118
Marcelja S (1980) Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells. J Opt Soc Am 70:1297–1300
Marr D (1982) Vision. Freeman, San Francisco
Perrone JA (1980) Slant underestimation: a model based on the size of the viewing aperture. Perception 9:285–302
Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (eds) Parallel distributed processing: exploring the microstructures of cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp 318–364
Sejnowski TJ, Koch C, Churchland PS (1988) Computational neuroscience. Science 241:1299–1307
Stevens K (1983) Slant — tilt: the visual encoding of surface orientation. Biol Cybern 46:183–195
Turner MR (1986) Texture discrimination by Gabor functions. Biol Cybern 55:71–82
Turner MR, Bajcsy R, Gerstein GL (1989a) Estimation of textured surface inclination by parallel local spectral analysis. University of Pennsylvania Technical Report: MS-CIS-89-42 GRASP LAB 184, March, 1989
Turner MR, Salganicoff M, Gerstein GL, Bajcsy R (1989b) Receptive fields for the determination of textured surface inclination. Univerity of Pennsylvania Technical Report: MS-CIS-89-48, GRASP LAB 187, July, 1989
Weber AG (1986) Image data base. Technical Report USC SIPI Report 101, University of Southern California, Signal and Image Processing Institute, February, 1986
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turner, M.R., Gerstein, G.L. & Bajcsy, R. Underestimation of visual texture slant by human observers: a model. Biol. Cybern. 65, 215–226 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00206219
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00206219