Abstract
The paper argues that admission requirements into public universities are best viewed as rent-seeking by several groups, in contrast to the conventional rationing rationale. The rents are principally nonfinancial for some of the groups. The paper concludes by showing why admission requirements are not set “too high.”
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bhagwati, J.N. (1982). Directly unproductive, profit-seeking (DUP) activities. Journal of Political Economy 90 (October): 988–1002.
Brown, K.M. (1972). The short reign of academic economism. Journal of Political Economy 80 (September/October): 1074–1076.
Brennan, H.G. and Tollison, R.D. (1980). Rent-seeking in academia. In Buchanan, J.M., et al. (1980). Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society, 344–356. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.
Buchanan, J.M. and Devletoglou, N.E. (1970). Academia in anarchy. New York: Basic Books.
Buchanan, J.M., Tollison, R.D. and Tullock, G. (1980). Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.
Kreuger, A.O. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. American Economic Review 64 (June): 291–303.
Niskanen, W.A. (1971), Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.
Posner, R.A. (1975). The social costs of monopoly and regulation. Journal of Political Economy 83 (August): 807–827.
Romer, T. (1988). Nobel laureate: On James Buchanan's contributions to public economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2 (Fall): 165–179.
Steindl, F.G. (1973). The appeal of minimum wage laws and the invisible hand in government. Public Choice 14 (Spring): 133–136.
Stigler, G.J. (1970). Director's law of public income distribution. Journal of Law and Economics 13 (April): 1–10.
Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. Western Economic Journal 5 (June): 224–232.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Discussions with Joe Jadlow, Scott Turner and Larkin Warner, and comments by colleagues on an earlier version in our departmental Workshop helped clarify the issues. I thank them, emphasizing that the normal caveat is not pro forma.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steindl, F.G. University admission requirements as rent-seeking. Public Choice 65, 273–279 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00204951
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00204951