Beghi L, Xausa E, Zanforlin M (1991) Analytic determination of depth effect in stereokinetic phenomena without a rigidity assumption. Biol Cybern 65:425–432
Google Scholar
Bennet B, Hoffman D (1985) The computation of structure from fixed axis motion: nonrigid structures. Biol Cybern 51:293–300
Google Scholar
Braunstein ML (1976) Depth perception through motion. Academic Press, New York
Google Scholar
Braunstein ML, Anderson GJ (1984) A counterexample to the rigidity assumption in visual perception of structure from motion. Perception 13:213–217
Google Scholar
Braunstein ML, Hoffman DD, Pollick FE (1990) Discriminating rigid from nonrigid motion: minimum points and views. Percept Psychophys 47:205–214
Google Scholar
Bressan P, Vallortigara G (1986) Multiple 3-D interpretations in a classic stereokinetic effect. Perception 15:405–408
Google Scholar
Cowie RID (1987) Rubber rhomboids: nonrigid interpretation of a rigid structure moving. Percept Psychophys 42:407–408
Google Scholar
Cutting JE (1987) Perception and information. Ann Rev Psychol 38:61–90
Google Scholar
Gregory RL (1980) Perception as hypothesis. Philos Trans R Soc London B 290:181–197
Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins HC (1986) Visual motion ambiguity. Vision Res 26:181–183
Google Scholar
Marmolin H (1973) Visually perceived motion in depth resulting from proximal changes; I and II. Percept Psychophis 14:133–142, 143–148
Google Scholar
Musatti CL (1924) Sui fenomeni stereocinetici. Arch Ital Psicol 3:105–120
Google Scholar
Musatti CL (1928) Sui movimenti apparenti dovuti ad illusione di identita' di figura. Arch Ital Psicol 6:205–219
Google Scholar
Musatti CL (1955) La stereocinesi e il problema delia struttura dello spazio visibile. Riv di Psicol 49:3–57
Google Scholar
Nakayama K (1985) Biological image processing: a review. Vision Res 25:625–660
Google Scholar
Poggio T, Koch C (1985) Ill-posed problems in early vision: from computational theory to analogue networks. Proc R Soc London B 226:303–323
Google Scholar
Renwall P (1929) Zur Theorie des stereokinethischen Phenomenes. Kaila E (ed) In: Annales Universitatis Aboensis, Ser B Tom X:13–75
Shulman D, Aloimonos JY (1988) (non-) rigid motion interpretation: a regularized approach. Proc R Soc London B 233:217–234
Google Scholar
Ullman S (1979) The interpretation of visual motion, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass
Google Scholar
Ullman S (1984) Maximizing rigidity. The incremental recovery of 3-D structure from rigid and non-rigid motion. Perception 13:255–274
Google Scholar
Vallortigara G, Bressan P, Zanforlin M (1986) The Saturn illusion: a new stereokinetic effect. Vision Res 26:811–813
Google Scholar
Vallortigara T, Bressan P, Bertamini M (1988) Perceptual alternations in stereokinesis. Perception 17:31–34
Google Scholar
Walker JT (1989) The vista paradox: a natural visual illusion. Percept Psychophys 45:43–48
Google Scholar
Wallach H, O'Connel DN (1953) The kinetic depth effect. J Exp Psychol 45:205–217
Google Scholar
Wallach H, Weiss A, Adams PA (1956) Circles and derived figures in rotation. Am J Psychol 69:48–59
Google Scholar
Zanforlin M (1988a) The height of a stereokinetic cone: a quantitative determination of a 3-D effect from 2-D moving pattern without a “rigidity assumption”. Psychol Res 50:162–172
Google Scholar
Zanforlin M (1988b) Stereokinetic phenomena as good Gestalts: the minimum principle applied to circles and ellipses in rotation: a quantitative analysis and a theoretical discussion. Gestalt Theor 10:187–214
Google Scholar
Zanforlin M (1989) Le illusioni ottiche nello studio della percezione visiva: fenomeni irrilevanti o nodi cruciali del problema? Riv Psicol LXXIV 2:11–31
Google Scholar
Zanforlin M, Vallotigara G (1988) Depth effect from a rotating line of constant length. Percept Psychophys 44:493–499
Google Scholar
Zanforlin M, Vallortigara G (1990) The magic wand: a new stereokinetic anomalous surface. Perception 19:447–457
Google Scholar