Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptual spatial frequency — Orientation surface: Psychophysics and line element theory

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have investigated the discriminability of gratings which simultaneously vary in spatial frequency and orientation. Thirteen and nine reference gratings were used with two observers, and bivariate discrimination probability surfaces were determined around each grating. These data were then fitted to a general bivariate Gaussian function. The results clearly demonstrate local separability in this log frequency and orientation discrimination domain. Our results also show that the factor contributing most to the non-Euclidean nature of such frequency/orientation discrimination is orientation anisotropia, although we also find some evidence for smaller changes in the associated Riemannian line-element at different frequency ranges. These results cast doubt upon claims for a “pseudo line-element” for frequency discrimination based upon the nonlinear outputs of a fixed set of detectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appelle S (1972) Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the oblique effect in man and animais. Psychol Bull 78:226–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Caelli TM, Hübner M (1983) On the efficient two-dimensional energy coding characteristics of spatial vision. Vision Res 23:1053–1055

    Google Scholar 

  • Caelli TM, Moraglia G (1985) On the detection of Gabor signals and the discrimination of Gabor textures. Vision Res 25:671–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Caelli T, Rentschier I (1986) Cross-correlation model of pattern acuity. J Opt Soc Am A 3:1948–1956

    Google Scholar 

  • Caelli TM, Brettel H, Rentschier I, Hilz R (1983) Discrimination thresholds in the two-dimensional spatial frequency domain. Vision Res 23:129–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell FW, Nachmias J, Jukes J (1970) Spatial frequency discrimination in human vision. J Opt Soc Am 60:555–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugman J (1980) Two-dimensional spectral analysis of cortical receptive field profiles. Vision Res 20:847–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugman J (1983) Six formal properties of two-dimensional anisotropic visual filters: Structural principles and frequency/orientation selectivity. IEEE Trans SMC-13:882–887

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugman J (1984) Spatial visual channels in the fourier plane. Vision Res 24:891–910

    Google Scholar 

  • DeValois R, DeValois K (1980) Spatial vision. Ann Rev Psychol 31:309–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman DD, Alf E Jr (1969) Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confintervals-rating method data. J Math Psychol 6:487–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro M, Caelli TM (1988) Relationships between integral transforms invariance and lie group theory. J Opt Soc Am A 5:738–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Green DM, Swets JA (1974) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Krieger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeley DW, Patterson IR, Thompson RJ (1987) Size discrimination thresholds for spatially localised patterns. Perception 16:229

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch J, Hylton R (1982) Limits of spatial-frequency discrimination as evidence of neural interpolation. J Opt Soc Am 72:1367–1374

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu YN, Arsenault HH, April G (1982) Rotation-invariantdigital pattern recognition using circular harmonic expansion. Appl Opt 12:4012–4015

    Google Scholar 

  • Korn G, Korn T (1968) Mathematical handbook for scientists and engineers. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz D, Luce R, Suppes P, Tversky A (1971) Foundations of measurement, vol 1. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • MacAdam DL (1942) Visual sensitivities to color differences in daylight. J Opt Soc Am 32:247

    Google Scholar 

  • MacAdam DL (1943) Specification of small chromaticity differences. J Opt Soc Am 33:18–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer JM, Kim CBY (1986) Smooth frequency discrimination functions for foveal, high-contrast, mid spatial frequencies. J Opt Soc Am A 3:1957–1969

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs L (1984) Angewandte Statistik. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 329–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberstein L (1943) Investigations on the intrinsic properties of the color domain. J Opt Soc Am 33:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberstein L, MacAdam DL (1945) The distribution of color matchings around a color center. J Opt Soc Am 35:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Treutwein B, Caelli TM, Rentschier I (1983) Visual sensitivities to two-dimensional frequency differences. Perception 12:A86

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson HR, Gelb DJ (1984) Modified line-element theory for spatial-frequency and width discrimination. J Opt Soc Am A 1:124–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson HR, Regan D (1984) Spatial-frequency adaptation and grating discrimination: predictions of a line-element model. J Opt Soc Am A 1:1091–1096

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Study supported by Fraunhofer Gesellschaft Grant INSAN I 0784-V-6385 and Guest Professorship Mu 93/103-1 for TC by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Treutwein, B., Rentschler, I. & Caelli, T. Perceptual spatial frequency — Orientation surface: Psychophysics and line element theory. Biol. Cybern. 60, 285–295 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00204126

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00204126

Keywords

Navigation