Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular dynamic simulation of amorphous carbon and graphite interface

  • Published:
Interface Science

Abstract

Amorphous carbon/graphite interface is modeled by molecular dynamic simulation using a Tersoff-type potential function with the Brenner parameters for in-plane interaction combined with the pair potential function for the interplanar bonding. The interface is created by compressing the amorphous carbon produced in a separate simulation with perfect crystalline graphite terminated to expose (1120) planes. The planar structure and weak interplanar bonding allow the graphitic planes to deform in order to accommodate the bonds formed at the interface, which is consistent with the HRTEM study of the interface. The simulation indicates that the generated interface mostly consists of nearly sp2 hybridized bonding connecting the two sides. The bonds across the interface when formed are likely to maintain their equilibrium configurations. Due to the large interplanar spacing, many atoms both on the graphite and a-C sides are left unbonded leaving the interface energetically unfavorable with respect to the bulk. These unbonded radicals probably weaken the structural rigidity of the interface providing a fracture path under stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B.N.Cox and D.B.Marshall, Ultramicroscopy 40, 365 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G.Savage, Carbon-Carbon Composite (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1993), p. 289.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S.P.Balm, A.W.Allaf, H.W.Kroto, and J.H.Murrel, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 87(6), 803 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.Takagi and K.Kawamura, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 6, 217 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.I.Haggie, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 3, 3065 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  6. T.Takai, C.Lee, T.Halicioglu, and W.A.Tiller, J. Phys. Chem. 94(11), 448 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.J.Oh and R.A.Johnson, Mater. Res. Symp. Proc. 141, 51 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.Tersoff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2879 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D.W.Brenner, Mater. Res. Symp. Proc. 141, 59 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.Tersoff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 632 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.Tersoff, Phys. Rev. B 39, 5566 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M.Tang and S.Yip, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 2719 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.Tersoff, Phys. Rev. B 37, 6991 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  14. P.C.Kelires, Phys. Rev. B 47, 1829 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  15. T.Halicioglu, Chem. Phys. Lett. 179, 159 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.A.Harrison, D.W.Brenner, C.T.White, and R.J.Colton, Thin Solid Films 206, 213 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  17. D.W.Brenner, J.A.Harrison, C.T.White, and R.J.Colton, Thin Solid Films 206, 220 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  18. D.H.Robertson, D.W.Brenner, C.T.White, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 6133 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D.Beeman, J. Computational Phys. 20, 130 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  20. T.A.Cherepanova, A.Vaivods, and H.Hermann, Materials Science Forum 62, 673 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.Q.Broughton and F.F.Abraham, J. Crys. Growth 75, 613 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  22. D.W.McKee, in Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, Vol. 23, edited by P.A.Thrower (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1981), p. 196.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J.F.Lutsko, D.Wolf, S.Yip, S.R.Phillpot, and T.Nguyen, Phys. Rev. B 38, 11572 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  24. H.J.C.Berendsen, J.P.M.Postma, W.F.vanGunsteren, A.DiNola, and J.R.Haak, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoon, C.S., Megusar, J. Molecular dynamic simulation of amorphous carbon and graphite interface. Interface Sci 3, 85–100 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203984

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203984

Keywords

Navigation