Skip to main content
Log in

The significance of cytological examination on reperfusion in rat small intestinal transplantation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the cytology of the exudate in preserved intestinal grafts on reperfusion and compared it with the histological findings in rat small intestinal transplantation. The jejunal graft was harvested from the Lewis rat and was preserved in University of Wisconsin solution for 6, 12, 24 and 48 h at 4 °C (n=6, in each group) and was then syngeneically transplanted. On reperfusion, the exudate was collected and studied cytologically. Full thickness biopsies were performed at the end of the preservation and at 30 min after reperfusion for histological examination. Histological examination after reperfusion showed that the crypt layer was preserved until 24 h. However, it was destroyed by 48 h preservation. The cytological findings correlated with the depth of tissue injury shown histologically. The degeneration of villus epithelial cells, the decrease in the content of mucin in both the goblet cells as well as villus cells, and the appearance of crypt cells are all considered to be signs of poor graft viability. Cytological examination is therefore recommended as an effective, non-invasive and real-time method for evaluating graft viability just after reperfusion in small intestinal transplantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bales CE, Durfee GR (1979) Cytologic techniques. In: Koss JG (ed) Diagnostic cytology and its histopathologic bases, 3rd edn, vol 2. pp 1187–1266, J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia. Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  2. Battelli MG, Corte ED, Stirpe F (1972) Xanthine oxidase type D (dehydrogenase) in the intestine and other organs of the rat. Biochem J 126:747–749

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chiu C-J, McArdle AM, Brown R, Scott HJ, Curd FN (1970) Intestinal mucosal lesions in low-flow states. I. A morphological, hemodynamic and metabolic reappraisal. Arch Surg 101:478–483

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Deltz E, Schroeder P, Gebhardt H, Gundlach M, Timmermann W, Engemann R, Leimenstoll G, Hansman ML, Westphal E, Hamelmann H (1989) Successful clinical small bowel transplantation: report of a case. Clin Transplant 3:89–91

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fabian MA, Canada AT, Coleman LR, Bollinger RR (1992) Use of tissue blood flow and high energy phosphate content to predict small bowel graft survival. Transplant Proc 24: 1088–1089

    Google Scholar 

  6. Filez L, Penninckx F, Stalmans W, Kerremans R, Geboes K (1994) Prevention of mucosal reperfusion damage after orthotopic small bowel autotransplantation in cats. Transplant Proc 26:1485–1488

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goulet O, Revillon Y, Jan D, Brousse N, DePotter S, CerfBensussan N, Rambaud C, Buisson C, Pellerin D, Mougenot JF, Fischer A, Ricour C (1990) Small bowel transplantation in children. Transplant Proc 22:2499–2500

    Google Scholar 

  8. Granger DN, Rutili G, McCord JM (1981) Superoxide radicals in feline intestinal ischemia. Gastroenterology 81:22–29

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grant D, Wall W, Mimeault R, Zhong R, Ghent C, Garcia B, Stiller C, Duff J (1990) Successful small-bowel/liver transplantation. Lancet 335:181–184

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hirata Y, Taguchi T, Suita S, Takeshige K (1994) Adenine nucleotide metabolism in relation to graft viability in rat small-bowel transplantation. Eur Surg Res 26:309–317

    Google Scholar 

  11. Manax WG, Bloch JH, Eyal Z, Lillehei RC (1965) Experimental preservation of the small bowel. Am J Surg 109:26–31

    Google Scholar 

  12. McCord JM (1985) Oxygen-derived free radicals in postischemic tissue injury. N Engl J Med 312:159–163

    Google Scholar 

  13. McManus JFA (1948) Histologic and histochemical use of periodic acid. Stain Technol 23:99–108

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Monchik GJ, Russel PA (1971) Transplantation of small bowel in the rat: technical and immunological considerations. Surgery 70:693–702

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mueller AR, Rao PN, Snyder JT, Hoffman RA, Schraut WH (1993) Hyaluronic acid and purine nucleoside phosphorylase in vascular and luminal effluents of small bowel grafts as parameters of preservation injuy. Transplantation 55:1225–1229

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mueller AR, Langrehr JM, Nalesnik M, Hoffman RA, Lee TK, Lee KKW, Schraut WH (1994) Mucosal glutaminase activity and histology as parameters of small bowel preservation injury. J Surg Res 56:207–215

    Google Scholar 

  17. Papanicolaou GN (1942) A new procedure for staining vaginal smears. Science 95:438–439

    Google Scholar 

  18. Park PO, Haglund U, Burkley GB, Faelt K (1990) The sequence of development of intestinal tissue injury after strangulation ischemia and reperfusion. Surgery 107:574–580

    Google Scholar 

  19. Raju S, Fujiwara H, Lewin JR, Grogan JB (1988) Twelve-hour and twenty-hour preservation of small bowel allografts by simple hypothermia: survival utilizing cyclosporine. Transplantation 45:290–293

    Google Scholar 

  20. Taguchi T, Yamada T, Hirata Y, Hirose R, Suita S, Toyohara T (1992) Technical aspects of graft harvesting in the rat small intestinal transplantation. J Jpn Soc Pediatr Surg 28:1314–1320

    Google Scholar 

  21. Taguchi T, Zorychta E, Guttman FM (1992) Evaluation of UW solution for preservation of small intestinal transplants in the rat. Transplantation 53:1202–1205

    Google Scholar 

  22. Taguchi T, Yamada T, Toyohara T, Suita S (1994) Parameters of graft viability before transplantation of the rat small bowel — A physiological evaluation of a preserved graft. Transplant Proc 26:1497

    Google Scholar 

  23. Todo S, Tzakis AG, Reyes J, Abu-Elmagd K, Furukawa H, Nour B, Casavilla A, Nakamura K, Fung J, Demetris AJ, Starzl T (1994) Small intestinal transplantation in humans with or without the colon. Transplantation 57:840–848

    Google Scholar 

  24. Toledo-Pereyra LH, Simmons RL, Najarian JS (1974) Prolonged survival of canine orthotopic small intestinal allografts preserved for 24 h by hypothermic bloodless perfusion. Surgery 75:368–376

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wagner R, Gabert H, Horn P (1979) Ischemia and post-ischemic regeneration of the small intestinal mucosa, a light microscopic and autoradiographic study. Virchows Arch [B] 31:259–276

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yamada T, Taguchi T, Hirata Y, Toyohara T, Hirose R, Suita S (1994) Assessment of small bowel graft viability based on energy metabolism and tissue blood flow. Transplant Proc 26:1473–1474

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taguchi, T., Yamada, T., Suita, S. et al. The significance of cytological examination on reperfusion in rat small intestinal transplantation. Vichows Archiv A Pathol Anat 427, 71–76 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203740

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203740

Key words

Navigation