Advertisement

Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 64, Issue 1, pp 41–49 | Cite as

Applicability of quadratic and threshold models to motion discrimination in the rabbit retina

  • Norberto M. Grzywacz
  • F. R. Amthor
  • L. A. Mistler
Article

Abstract

Computational and behavioral studies suggest that visual motion discrimination is based on quadratic nonlinearities. This raises the question of whether the behavior of motion sensitive neurons early in the visual system is actually quadratic. Theoretical studies show that mechanisms proposed for retinal directional selectivity do not behave quadratically at high stimulus contrast. However, for low contrast stimuli, models for these mechanisms may be grouped into three categories: purely quadratic, quadratic accompanied by a rectification, and models mediated by a high level threshold. We discriminated between these alternatives by analyzing the extracellular responses of ON-OFF directionally selective ganglion cells of the rabbit retina to drifting periodic gratings. The data show that purely-quadratic or high-threshold systems do not account for the behavior of these cells. However, their behavior is consistent with a rectified-quadratic model.

Keywords

Retina Ganglion Cell Visual Motion Threshold Model Periodic Grating 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adelson EH, Bergen JR (1985) Spatio-temporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am A2:284–299Google Scholar
  2. Ames A, Nesbett FB (1981) In vitro retina as an experimental model of the central nervous system. J Neurochem 37:867–877PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Amthor FR, Grzywacz NM (1990) The nonlinearity of the inhibition underlying retinal directional selectivity. Vis NeurosciGoogle Scholar
  4. Amthor FR, Oyster CW, Takahashi ES (1984) Morphology of on-off direction-selective ganglion cells in the rabbit retina. Brain Res 298:187–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Amthor FR, Takahashi ES, Oyster CW (1989) Morphologies of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with complex receptive fields. J Comp Neurol 280:97–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ariel M, Adolph AR (1985) Neurotransmitter inputs to directionally sensitive turtle retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol 54:1123–1143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ariel M, Daw NW (1982) Pharmacological analysis of directionally sensitive rabbit retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol 324:161–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Barlow HB, Levick WR (1985) The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit's retina. J Phyiol 178:477–504Google Scholar
  9. Dowling JE (1979) Information processing by local circuits: The vertebrate retina as a model system. In: Schmitt FO, Worden FG (eds) The neurosciences, fourth study program, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp 163–181Google Scholar
  10. Egelhaaf M, Borst A, Reichardt W (1989) The nonlinear mechanism of direction selectivity in the fly motion detection system. Naturwissenschaften 76:32–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emerson RC, Citron MC, Vaughn WJ, Klein SA (1987) Nonlinear directionally sensitive subunits in complex cells of cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 58:33–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Famiglietti EV, Kaneko A, Tachibana M (1977) Neuronal architecture of ON and OFF pathways to ganglion cells in carp retina. Science 198:1267–1268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Foxman B, Victor J (1987) A VEP study of flickering and moving gratings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 28:297Google Scholar
  14. Geiger G, Poggio T (1975) The orientation of flies towards visual patterns: on search for the underlying functional interactions. Biol Cybern 19:39–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Grzywacz NM, Koch C (1987) Functional properties of models for direction selectivity in the retina. Synapse 1:417–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Grzywacz NM, Poggio T (1990) Computation of motion by real neurons. In: Zornetzer SF, Davis JL, Lau C (eds) An introduction to neural and electronic networks. Academic Press, New York, pp 379–403Google Scholar
  17. Grzywacz NM, Yuille AL (1990) A model for the estimate of local image velocity by cells in the visual cortex. Proc R Soc London B 239:129–161Google Scholar
  18. Hassenstein B, Reichardt WE (1956) Systemtheoretische Analyse der Zeit-, Reihenfolgen- und Vorzeichenauswer-tung bei der Bewe-gunsperzeption des Rüsselkafers Chlorophanus. Z Naturforsch 11b:513–524Google Scholar
  19. Hausen K (1981) Monocular and binocular computation of motion in the Lobula Plate of the fly. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 74:49–70Google Scholar
  20. Heeger DJ (1987) A model for the extraction of image flow. J Opt Soc Am A4:1455–1471Google Scholar
  21. Hopfield JJ (1984) Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:3088–3092PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1959) Receptive fields of single neurons in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol 148:574–591PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuffler SW (1953) Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. J Neurophysiol 16:37–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Marchiafava PL (1979) The responses of retinal ganglion cells to stationary and moving visual stimuli. Vision Res 19:1203–1211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Masland RH, Mills W, Cassidy C (1984) The functions of acetylcholine in the rabbit retina. Proc R Soc London B 223:121–139Google Scholar
  26. Maturana HR, Lettvin JY, McCulloch WS, Pitts WH (1960) Anatomy and physiology of vision in the frog (Rana Pipiens). J Gen Physiol 43 [Suppl. 2]:129–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller RF, Bloomfield SA (1983) Electroanatomy of an unique amacrine cell in the rabbit retina. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:3069–3073PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller RF, Dacheux RF (1975) Chloride sensitive receptive field mechanisms in the isolated retina-eyecup of the rabbit. Brain Res 90:329–334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mistler LA, Amthor FR, Koch C (1985) Modeling HRP-injected, physiologically-characterized direction-selective ganglion cells in rabbit retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26:165Google Scholar
  30. Oyster CW (1968) The analysis of image motion by the rabbit retina. J Physiol 199:613–635PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Poggio T (1975) Stochastic linearization, central limit theorem and linearity in (nervous) ‘black-boxes’. Atti del III Congresso di Cibernetica e Biofisica, pp 349–358Google Scholar
  32. Poggio T (1983) Visual algorithms. In: Braddick OJ, Sleigh AC (eds) Physical and biological processing of images, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 128–153Google Scholar
  33. Poggio T, Reichardt WE (1973) Considerations on models of movement detection. Kykbernetik 13:223–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosenblatt F (1962) Principles of neurodynamics. Spartan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Rummelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323:533–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schiller PH, Finlay BL, Volman SF (1976) Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. I. Spatiotemporal organization of receptive fields. J Neurophysiol 49:1288–1319Google Scholar
  37. Sherrington CS (1933) The brain and its mechanism. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Thorson J (1966) Small-signal analysis of a visual reflex in the locust. II. Frequency dependence. Kybernetik 3:52–66Google Scholar
  39. Torre V, Poggio T (1978) A synaptic mechanism possibly underlying irectional selectivity to motion. Proc R Soc London Ser B 202:409–416Google Scholar
  40. Schiller PH, Sandell JH, Maunsell JHR (1986) Function of the ON and OFF channels of the visual system. Nature 322:824–825CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Santen JPH, Sperling G (1984) A temporal covariance model of motion perception. J Opt Soc Am A1:451–473Google Scholar
  42. Victor JD, Shapley RM (1979) The nonlinear pathway of Y ganglion cells in the cat retina. J Gen Physiol 74:671–689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Watanabe S-I, Murakami M (1984) Synaptic mechanisms of directional selectivity in ganglion cells of frog retina as revealed by intracellular recordings. Jpn J Physiol 34:497–511PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norberto M. Grzywacz
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. R. Amthor
    • 3
  • L. A. Mistler
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Biological Information Processing, Department of Brain and Cognitive SciencesMassachusetts Institute of Technology, E25-201CambridgeUSA
  2. 2.The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research InstituteSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations