Skip to main content
Log in

A study of the encoder properties of muscle-spindle primary afferent fibers by a random noise disturbance of the steady stretch response

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Muscle spindle stretch responses (cat gastrocnemius muscles) were studied when bothsteady stretch andsmall near-threshold random stretch determined the Ia impulse sequence. Statistical properties of the inter-impulse-intervals gave some insight into the Ia encoder mechanism. Superimposed random stretch of mean velocitiesσ vel below 5 mm s−1 did not change the mean discharge rate, but the width of the Ia interspike interval distribution was clearly increased. Raising the stretch velocity further (σ vel > 5 mm s−1) led to an additional increase in the distribution width, finally reaching values of 0.6 for the coefficient of variation. The shapes of the impulse interval histograms changed from symmetrical to positively skewed ones. The 1st order serial correlation coefficient of the interval sequence shifted to slightly more negative values with increasingσ vel; on the average, ther 1,2-value varied between zero and −0.2. The data were discussed in relation to current ideas on the mechanism of impulse initiation in the Ia terminal ending. They provide evidence that a combination of multiple encoder sites located in the myelinated terminal branches and a separate pathway for large static and small-amplitude dynamic stretch is not very likely. A model is proposed as to how the whole tree of myelinated axons functions as a single encoder site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banks RW (1986) Observations on the primary sensory ending of the tenuissimus muscle spindles in the cat. Cell Tissue Res 246:309–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker D (1974) The morphology of muscle receptors. In: Hunt CC (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol III/2:Muscle receptors. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 1–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd IA (1976) The mechanical properties of dynamic nuclear bag fibres, static nuclear bag fibres and nuclear chain fibres in isolated cat muscle spindles. Progr Brain Res 44:33–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd IA (1981) The action of three types of intrafusal fibre in isolated cat muscle spindles on the dynamic and length sensitivities of primary and secondary sensory endings. In: Taylor A, Prochazka A (eds) Muscle receptors and movement. Macmillan, London, pp17–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd IA (1985) Review. In: Boyd IA, Gladden MH (eds) The muscle spindle. M Stockton Press, London New York, pp 129–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Brokensha G, Westbury PR (1974) Adaptation of the discharge of frog muscle spindles following a stretch. J Physiol 242:383–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown MC, Engberg I, Matthews PBC (1967) The relative sensitivity of vibration of muscle receptors of the cat. J Physiol 192:773–800

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller AJ (1985) A model illustrating some aspects of muscle spindle physiology. J Physiol 179:402–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller AJ, Nichols JG, Ström G (1953) Spontaneous fluctuations of excitability in the muscle spindle of the frog. J Physiol 122:409–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagles JP, Purple RL (1974) Afferent fibers with multiple encoder sites. Brain Res 77:187–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysel UT (1971) Computer simulation of the impulse pattern of muscle spindle afferents. Kybernetik 8:171–179

    Google Scholar 

  • French AS, Stein RB (1970) Flexible neural analog using integrated circuits. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 17:248–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisler CD, Goldberg JM (1966) A stochastic model of the repetitive activity of neurons. Biophys J 6:53–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory JE, Harvey RJ, Proske U (1977) A ‘late supernormal period’ in the recovery of excitability following an action potential in muscle spindle and tendon organ receptors. J Physiol 271:449–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Grüsser O-J, Höhne-Zahn H, Jahn SA, Pellnitz K (1973) The encoding of the receptor potential into impulse patterns of muscle spindle afferents of cats. In: Gydikov AA, Tankov NT, Kosarov DS (eds) Motor control. Plenum Press, New York, pp 15–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden AV (1976) Models of the stochastic activity of neurons. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 368

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulliger M, Noth J (1979) Static and dynamic fusimotor interaction and the possibility of multiple pace-makers operating in the cat muscle spindle. Brain Res 173:21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt CC, Wilkinson RS (1985) Passive and active properties of mammalian intrafusal fibres. In: Boyd IA, Gladden MH (eds) The muscle spindle. Stockton Press, London New York, pp151–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito F, Kanamori N, Kuroda H (1974) Structural and functional asymmetries of myelinated branches in the frog muscle spindle. J Physiol 241:389–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Jami L, Petit J, Scott JJA (1985) Driving of spindle primary endings by static β axons. In: Boyd IA, Gladden MH (eds) The muscle spindle. Stockton Press, London New York, pp 201–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Kröller J, Grüsser O-J, Weiss L (1985) The response of primary muscle spindle endings to random muscle stretch: a quantitative analysis. Exp Brain Res 61:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Kröller J, Grüsser O-J, Weiss L-R (1988) Observations on phaselocking within the response of primary muscle spindle afferents to pseudo-random stretch. Biol Cybern 59:49–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennerstrand G (1968) Position and velocity sensitivity of muscle spindles in the cat. I. Primary and secondary endings deprived of fusimotor activation. Acta Physiol Scand 73:281–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews PBC, Stein RB (1969) The regularity of primary and secondary muscle spindle afferent discharges. J Physiol 202:59–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizote M (1976) Effects of FM vibration on muscle spindles in the cat. Progr Brain Res 44:133–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottoson D (1976) Morphology and physiology of muscle spindles. In: Llinas R, Precht W (eds) Frog neurobiology. Springer. Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 643–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Paintal AS (1959) Facilitation and depression of muscle stretch receptors by repetitive antidromic stimulation, adrenaline and asphyxia. J Physiol 148:252–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkel DH, Gerstein GL, Moore GP (1967) Neural spike trains and stochastic point process. Biophys J 7:391–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppele RE, Quick DC (1981) Stretch induced contraction of intrafusal muscle in cat muscle spindles. J Neurosci 1:1069–1074

    Google Scholar 

  • Quick DC (1986) Acute lesion of the intrafusal muscle of muscle spindles: ultrastructural and electrophysiological consequences. J Neurosci 6:2097–2105

    Google Scholar 

  • Quick DC, Kennedy WR, Poppele RE (1980) Anatomical evidence for multiple sources of action potentials in the afferent fibers of muscle spindles. Neuroscience 5:109–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Rall W (1977) Core conductors theory and cable properties of neurons. In: Brookhart JM, Mountcastle VB, Kandel ER, Geiger SR (eds) Handbook of physiology, Sect. 1:The nervous system, vol I. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 39–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolove PG (1972) Computer simulation of after-inhibition in crayfish slowly adapting stretch receptor neuron. Biophys J 12:1429–1459

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein RB (1967) Some models of neuronal variability. Biophys J 7:37–68

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kröller, J., Grüsser, O.J. & Weiss, L.R. A study of the encoder properties of muscle-spindle primary afferent fibers by a random noise disturbance of the steady stretch response. Biol. Cybern. 63, 91–97 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203030

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203030

Keywords

Navigation