Skip to main content
Log in

Bhartrhari's paradox

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  • Note: We have used two editions of Vākyapadīya. For references to Book III Chapters 1 through 7 (VP. III.1–7), see Iyer 1963: for all other references to VP see Rau, 1977.

  • Iyer, Subramania (1963). Vākyapadīya of Bhartrhari with the commentary of Helārāja: 17–03 III, part 1, (Poona, Deccan College).

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, Subramania (1969). Bhartrhari: a study of the Vākyapadīya in the light of ancient commentaries, (Deccan College, Poona).

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, Subramania (1971). The Vākyapadīya of 17–05, chapter III, part 1: English translation (Deccan College, Poona).

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, Karl (1968). “stitva Jňeyatva Abhidheyatva”, in Festschrift fur Erich Frauwallner, Wiener Zeitschrift fur die Kunde Sud-und Ostasiens und Archiv fur indische Philosophie, Wien, 275–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, Karl (1977). Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies. Volume 2 (Princeton).

  • Quine, W. v. O. (1963). Set Theory and Its Logic (Harvard).

  • Rau, Wilhelm (1977). Bhartrhari's Vākyapadīya (Deutsche Morgenlandische Gesellschaft).

  • Russell, Bertrand (1908). “Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types”, reprinted in R. Marsh, editor, Logic and Knowledge (MacMillan).

  • Suppes, Patrick (1960). Axiomatic Set Theory (Van Nostrand).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This is a revised version of a paper originally published in N. J. Shah and D. Malvania, editors, Studies in Indian Philosophy, Ahmedabad (in press). We are indebted to Professors K. Kunjunni Raja and Bimal K. Matilal for discussing with us certain problems of translation and exegesis. We are also grateful to the Rishi Valley School and to Vasanta Vihar, Madras, for their hospitality while this paper was being written; and to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for its support.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herzberger, H.G., Herzberger, R. Bhartrhari's paradox. J Indian Philos 9, 1–17 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00202726

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00202726

Navigation