Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of amplified DNA sequences by reverse chromosome painting using genomic tumor DNA as probe

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A modification of “reverse chromosome painting” was carried out using genomic DNA from tumor cells as a complex probe for chromosomal in situ suppression hybridization to normal metaphase chromsome spreads. Amplified DNA sequences contained in such probes showed specific signals, revealing the normal chromosome positions from which these sequences were derived. As a model system, genomic DNAs were analyzed from three tumor cell lines with amplification units including the proto-oncogene c-myc. The smallest amplification unit was about 90 kb and was present in 16–24 copies; the largest unit was bigger than 600 kb and was present in 16–32 copies. Specific signals that co-localized with a differently labeled c-myc probe on chromosome band 8q24 were obtained with genomic DNA from each cell line. In further experiments, genomic DNA derived from primary tumor material was used in the case of a male patient with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Southern blot analysis using an epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) probe that maps to 7p13 indicated the amplification of sequences from this gene. Using reverse chromosome painting, signals were found both on band 7p13 and bands 12q13–q15. Notably, the signal on 12q13–q15 was consistently stronger. The weaker 7p13 signal showed co-localization with the major signal of the differently labeled EGFR probe. A minor signal of this probe was seen on 12q13, suggesting cross-hybridization to ERB3 sequences homologous to EGFR. The results indicate co-amplification of sequences from bands 12q13–q15, in addition to sequences from band 7p13. Several oncogenes map to 12q13–q15 providing candidate genes for a tumor-associated proto-oncogene amplification. Although the nature of the amplified sequences needs to be clarified, this experiment demonstrates the potential of reverse chromosome painting with genomic tumor DNA for rapidly mapping the normal chromosomal localization of the DNA from which the amplified sequences were derived. In addition, a weaker staining of chromosomes 10 and X was consistently observed indicating that these chromosomes were present in only one copy in the GBM genome. This rapid approach can be used to analyze cases where no metaphase spreads from the tumor material are available. It does not require any preknowledge of amplified sequences and can be applied to screen large numbers of tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alitalo K, Schwab M (1986) Oncogene amplification in tumor cells. In: Klein G, Weinhouse S (eds) Advances in cancer research. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 235–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Alitalo K, Schwab M, Lin CC, Varmus HE, Bishop JM (1983) Homogeneously staining chromosomal regions contain amplified copies of an abundantly expressed cellular oncogene (c-myc) in malignant neuroendocrine cells from a human colon carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:1707–1711

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Am I, Mor O, Yeger H, Shiloh Y, Avivi L (1992) Detection of amplified DNA sequences in human tumor cell lines by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 4:314–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigner SH, Vogelstein B (1990) Cytogenetics and molecular genetics of malignant gliomas and medulloblastoma. Brain Pathol 1:12–18

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle AL, Lichter P, Ward DC (1990) Rapid analysis of mouse-hamster hybrid cell lines by in situ hybridization. Genomics 7:127–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter NP, Ferguson-Smith MA, Pemyman MT, Telenius H, Palmear AH, Leversha MA, Glancy MT, Wood SL, Cook K, Dyson HM, Ferguson-Smith ME, Willatt R (1992) Reverse chromosome painting: a method for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes in clinical cytogenetics. J Med Genet 29:299–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins S, Groudine M (1982) Amplification of endogeneous myc-related DNA sequences in a human myeloid leukaemia cell line. Nature 298:679–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig IW, McBride OW (1991) Report of the committee on the genetic constitution of chromosome 12. Cytogenet Cell Genet 58:555–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalla Favera R, Wong-Staal F, Gallo RC (1982) One gene amplification in promyelocytic leukaemia cell line HL-60 and primary leukaemic cells of the same patient. Nature 299:61–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller GN, Bigner SH (1992) Amplified cellular oncogenes in neoplasms of the human nervous system. Mutat Res 276:299–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley J, Kinchington D, Whittle N, Ullrich A, Waterfield MD (1987) The epidermal growth factor receptor gene. Oncogenes, genes and growth factors. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Henglein B, Synovzik H, Groitl P, Bornkamm GW, Hartl P, Lipp M (1989) Three breakpoints of variant t(2;8) translocations in Burkitt's lymphoma cells fall within a region 140 kilobases distal from c-myc. Mol Cell Biol 9:2105–2113

    Google Scholar 

  • Joos S, Haluska FG, Falk MH, Henglein B, Harmeister H, Croce CM, Bornkamm GW (1992) Mapping chromosomal breakpoints of Burkitt's t(8;14) translocations far upstream of c-myc. Cancer Res 52:6547–6552

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallioniemi O-P, Kallioniemi A, Chen L-C, Sudar D, Rutovitz D, Smith HS, Gray JW, Pinkel D, Waldman FW (1992) Many different chromosomal regions may undergo amplification during cancer initiation and progression (abstract). Am J Hum Genet 51:A40

    Google Scholar 

  • Kievits T, Devilee P, Wiegant J, Wapenaar MC, Cornelisse CJ, van Ommen GJB, Pearson PL (1990) Direct nonradioactive in situ hybridization of somatic cell hybrid DNA to human lymphocyte chromosomes. Cytometry 11:105–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzler KW, Zehnbauer BA, Brodeur GM, Seeger RC, Trent JM, Meltzer PS, Vogelstein B (1986) Amplification units containing human N-myc and c-myc genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:1157–1174

    Google Scholar 

  • Lengauer C, Riethman H, Cremer T (1990) Painting of human chromosomes generated from hybrid cell lines by PCR with Alu and L1 primers. Hum Genet 86:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter P, Cremer T (1992) Chromosome analysis by non-isotopic in situ hybridization. In: Rooney DE, Czepulkowski BH (eds) Human cytogenetics. Vol I. Constitutional analysis. IRL, Oxford New York Tokyo, pp 157–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter P, Ledbetter SA, Ledbetter DH, Ward DC (1990) Fluorescence in situ hybridization with Alu and L1 polymerase chain reaction probes for rapid characterization of human chromosomes in hybrid cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:6634–6638

    Google Scholar 

  • Little CD, Nau MM, Carney DN, Gazdar AF, Minna JD (1983) Amplification and expression of the c-myc oncogene in human lung cancer cell lines. Nature 306:194–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor,NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Manoir S du, Speicher MR, Joos S, Schröck E, Popp S, Döhner H, Kovacs G, Robert-Nicoud M, Lichter P, Cremer T (1993) Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization. Hum Genet 90:580–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Mengle-Gaw L, Rabbitts TH (1987) A human chromosome 8 region with abnormalities in B-cell, HTLV-1 T cell and myc amplified tumours. Embo J 6:1959–1965

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkel D, Gray JW, Trask B, Engh G van den, Fuscoe J, Dekken H van (1986) Cytogenetic analysis by in situ hybridization with fluorescently labeled nucleic acid probes. Cold Spring Harbour Symp Quant Biol 51:151–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Ried T, Baldini A, Rand TC, Ward DC (1992) Simultaneous visualization of seven different DNA probes by in situ hybridization using combinatorial fluorescence and digital imaging microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:1388–1392

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruppert JM, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW (1991) The zinc finger protein GLI transforms primary cells in cooperation with adenovirus. E1A. Mol Cell Biol 11:1724–1728

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg AA (1990) The chromosomes in human cancer and leukemias. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Telenius H, Pelmear AH, Tunnacliffe A, Carter NP, Behmel A, Ferguson-Smith MA, Nordensköld M, Pfragner R, B.A.J.P (1992) Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 4:257–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Zülch KJ (1979) International typing of tumors of the central nervous system. International classification of tumors. No 21. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joos, S., Scherthan, H., Speicher, M.R. et al. Detection of amplified DNA sequences by reverse chromosome painting using genomic tumor DNA as probe. Hum Genet 90, 584–589 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00202475

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00202475

Keywords

Navigation