Effect of field of view on MR diagnosis of rotator cuff tears
- 28 Downloads
Purpose. To determine the effect of decreasing the field of view (FOV) on the accuracy of MR for diagnosing rotator cuff tears.
Material and methods. One hundred shoulder MR scans with surgical correlation were evaluated for the presence or absence of a cuff tear. The sensitivity and specificity of MR relative to the surgical results were determined for the 59 patients scanned with a 24-cm FOV, and the 41 patients scanned with an 18-cm FOV. All other imaging parameters including acquisition time were identical. The sensitivity and specificity of the two groups were compared using a t-test.
Results. The specificity of MR for diagnosing a rotator cuff tear improved from 0.65 for the 24-cm FOV group to 0.89 for the 18-cm FOV group (P = 0.04). The sensitivity changed from 0.91 to 0.96 (P = 0.25).
Conclusion. Reducing the FOV from 24 cm to 18 cm results in a statistically significant improvement in specificity of MR for diagnosing rotator cuff tears.
Key wordsShoulder injuries Tendon injuries Magnetic resonance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Bradley WG, Kortman ICE, Crues JV. Central nervous system high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: effect of increasing spatial resolution on resolving power. Radiology 1985; 156: 93–98.Google Scholar
- 2.Foo TKF, Shellock FG, Hayes CE, Schenck JF, Slayman BE. High resolution MR imaging of the wrist and eye with short TR, short TE, and partial echo acquisition. Radiology 1992; 183: 277–281.Google Scholar
- 3.Bradley WG, Tsuruda JS. MR sequence parameter optimization: an algorithmic approach. AJR 1987; 149: 815–823.Google Scholar
- 4.Berquist TH, Morin RL. General technical considerations in musculoskeletal MRI. In: Berquist TH (ed) MRI of the musculoskeletal system, 2nd edn. New York: Raven Press, 1990; 53–73.Google Scholar
- 5.Westesson PL, Kwok E, Barsotti JB, Hatala M, Paesani D. Temporomandibular joint: improved MR image quality with decreased section thickness. Radiology 1992; 182: 280–282.Google Scholar
- 6.Burstein DB, Fritts HM, Fischer DA. Diagnosis of meniscal and cruciate tears using MRI. Minn Med 1991; 74: 29–32.Google Scholar
- 7.Raffi M, Firooznia H, Sherman O, et al. Rotator cuff lesions: signal patterns at MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 177: 817–823.Google Scholar
- 9.Burk DL, Karasick D, Kurtz AB, et al. Rotator cuff tears: prospective comparison of MR imaging with arthrography, sonography, and surgery. AJR 1989; 153: 87–92.Google Scholar
- 10.Synder SJ. A complete system for arthroscopy and bursoscopy of the shoulder. Surg Rounds Orthop 1989; 7: 57–65.Google Scholar
- 11.Tuite MJ, Yandow DR, DeSmet AA, Orwin JF, Quintana FA. Diagnosis of partial and complete rotator cuff tears using combined gradient echo and spin echo imaging. Skeletal Radio 1994; 23: 541–545.Google Scholar
- 12.Holt RG, Helms CA, Steinbach L, Neumann C, Munk PL, Genant HK. Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder: rationale and current applications. Skeletal Radiol 1990; 19: 5–14.Google Scholar
- 14.Stiles RG, Otte MT. Imaging of the shoulder. Radiology 1993; 188: 603–613.Google Scholar
- 15.Pathria MN. Rotator cuff tears: techniques, theory, and practice. In: Weissman BN (ed) RSNA categorical course in musculoskeletal radiology. Oak Brook, IL: Radiologic Society of North America, 1993; 107–112.Google Scholar
- 16.Clark JM, Harryman DT. Tendons, ligaments, and capsule of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1992; 74: 713–725.Google Scholar