Skip to main content
Log in

Intravenous methylmethacrylate following cemented total hip arthroplasty

  • Articles
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Both cemented and noncemented techniques have been used for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Each technique has advantages and disadvantages. Among the disadvantages of cemented THA are several perioperative complications, such as intraoperative cardiac or respiratory failure and hypotension, called “cement implantation syndrome,” and extrusion of cement beyond the confines of the medullary canal. Cement extrusion can be the result of overreaming of the femoral canal and cortical perforation. This is a worrisome finding, as the risk of subsequent femoral fracture at the site of perforation is increased. Extruded cement, however, does not always indicate a problem. Extruded cement located within the femoral venous system, intravenous methylmethacrylate, for example, is not associated with long-term complications. While uncommon, it is important to differentiate this finding from the more serious cortical perforation.

We report four examples of intravenous methylmethacrylate following THA and describe the imaging features that allow differentiation of this entity from the more significant finding of cortical perforation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harris WH, McGann WA. Loosening of the femoral component after use of the medullary-plug cementing technique. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1986; 68:1064.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Orsini EC, Byrick RJ, Mullen JBM, et al. Cardiopulmonary function and pulmonary microemboli during arthroplasty using cemented or non-cemented components. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1987, 69:822.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ereth MH, Weber JG, Abel MD, et al. Cemented versus non-cemented hip arthroplasty — embolism, hemodynamics, and intrapulmonary shunting. Mayo Clin Proc 1992; 67:1066.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Herndon JH, Bechtol CO, Crickenberger DP. Fat embolism during total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1974; 56:1350.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weissman BN, Sosman JL, Braunstein EM, et al. Intravenous methylmethacrylate after total hip replacement J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1984; 66:443.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rabin DN, Smith C, Kubicka RA, et al. Problem prostheses: the radiologic evaluation of total joint replacement. Radiographics 1987; 7:1107.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Callaghan JJ, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM. Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement. 1979 to 1982. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67:1074.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kallos T, Enis JE, Gollan F, Davis JH. Intramedullary pressure and pulmonary embolism of femoral medullary contents in dogs during insertion of bone cement and a prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1974; 56:1363.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brandser, E., El-Khoury, G., Riley, M. et al. Intravenous methylmethacrylate following cemented total hip arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol. 24, 493–494 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00202143

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00202143

Keywords

Navigation