Advertisement

Trees

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 195–201 | Cite as

Growth and water relations of Liquidambar styraciflua L. in an urban park and plaza

  • Roger K. Kjelgren
  • James R. Clark
Article

Summary

Growth and water relations of 10-year-old sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) street trees were studied in sites with low and high potential evapotranspiration to determine how these differences are integrated by growth and water relations over time. The trees were located in the parking strip between the curb and sidewalk at a partially vegetated urban park and an urban plaza in Seattle, Washington. Crown size, and seasonal and diurnal stomatal conductance and water potential, as well as diurnal air temperature and humidity, were measured over 2 growing seasons. Yearly trunk growth since transplanting was measured from increment cores. Vapor pressure deficits and air temperatures averaged 18% greater at the plaza, but whole-tree water loss appeared to be much lower than the park trees due to more restricted stomatal conductance and crown size. In addition, yearly diameter increment declined progressively once the plaza trees were established in the existing soil several years after transplanting. Lower water potential in the plaza trees indicated greater internal moisture deficits than the park trees, and tissue analysis revealed lower nutritional status, particularly nitrogen. A manipulative study of water and fertilizer to several additional plaza trees showed an interaction between water and nutrient deficiencies in the coarse and shallow soil that apparently limited growth. Furthermore, soil limitations probably interacted with paved surface conditions over time by reducing nutrient recycling from leaf litter, and generating higher vapor pressure deficits that would contribute to prolonged stomatal closure. Restricted growth and water relations status of the plaza trees represented an equilibrium between chronic high-resource demand above ground and limited below ground.

Key words

Stomatal conductance Water potential Urban Nutrient deficiency 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown R, Schultz R, Kormanik P (1981) Response of vesicular-arbuscular endomycorrhizal sweetgum seedlings to three nitrogen fertilizers. For Sci 27: 413–420Google Scholar
  2. Clark J, Kjelgren R (1989) Conceptual and management considerations for the development of urban tree plantings. J Arbor 15: 229–236Google Scholar
  3. Choudhury B, Monteith J (1986) Implications of stomatal response to saturation deficit for the heat balance of vegetation. Agric For Meteorol 36: 215–225Google Scholar
  4. Doll D, Ching J, Kaneshiro J (1985). Parameterization of subsurface heating for soil and concrete using net radiation data. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 32: 351–372Google Scholar
  5. Gee G, Bauder J (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Campbell G, Jackson R, Mortland M, Nielsen D, Klute A (eds) Methods of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 383–409Google Scholar
  6. Grier C, Running S (1977) Leaf area of mature northwestern coniferous forests: relation to site water balance. Ecology 58: 893–899Google Scholar
  7. Heilman J, Brittin C, Zajicek J (1989) Water use by shrubs as affected by energy exchange with building walls. Agric Forest Meteorol 48: 345–357Google Scholar
  8. Hinckley T, Lassoie J, Running S (1978) Temporal and spatial variations in the water status of forest trees. For Sci Monogr 20Google Scholar
  9. Hunt R, Weber J, Gates D (1985) Effects of nitrate application on Amaranthus powellii Wats. II. Stomatal response to vapor pressure difference is consistent with optimization of stomatal conductance. Plant Physiol 79: 614–618Google Scholar
  10. Jones J, Zur B, Bennett J (1986) Interactive effects of water and nitrogen stresses on carbon and water vapor exchange of corn canopies. Agric Meteorol 38: 113–126Google Scholar
  11. Jones J, Wolf B, Mills H (1991) Plant analysis handbook. Micro-Macro Publications, Athens, Ga.Google Scholar
  12. Karlic H, and Richter H (1979) Storage of detached leaves and twigs without changes in water potential. New Phytol 83: 379–384Google Scholar
  13. Kartusch B (1983) The photosynthetic capacity of two shrubs (Spiraea sp. and Ligustrum vulgare) in a city biotop. Flora 173: 223–232Google Scholar
  14. Landsberg H (1979) Atmospheric changes in a growing community (the Columbia, Maryland experience). Urban Ecol 4: 53–81Google Scholar
  15. Lowerts G, Stone J (1982) The effect of soil bulk density on nursery sweetgum seedling growth. Tree Plant Notes 33: 3–5Google Scholar
  16. Miller D (1980) The two-dimensional energy budget of a forest edge with field measurements at a forest-parking lot interface. Agric Meteorol 22: 53–78Google Scholar
  17. Miller R (1988) Urban forestry: planning and managing urban green spaces. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  18. Monteith J, Unsworth M (1990) Principles of environmental physics, 2nd edn. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Munns R (1988) Why measure osmotic adjustment. Aust J Plant Physiol 15: 717–726PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nelson L, Switzer G (1990) Sweetgum half-sib sced source reponse to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization in Mississippi. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54: 871–878Google Scholar
  21. Oke T (1978) Boundary layer meteorology. University Paperbacks, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Pezeshki S, Chambers J (1986) Stomatal and photosynthetic response of drought-stressed cherrybark oak (Quercus falcata var. pagodaefolia) and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua). Can J For Res 16: 841–846Google Scholar
  23. Radin J, Boyer J (1982) Control of leaf expansion by nitrogen nutrition in sunflower plants. Plant Physiol 69: 771–775Google Scholar
  24. Radin J, Parker L (1979a) Water relations of cotton plants under nitrogen deficiency. I. Dependence upon leaf structure. Plant Physiol 64: 495–498Google Scholar
  25. Radin J, Parker L (1979b) Water relations of cotton plants under nitrogen deficiency. II. Environmental interactions on stomata. Plant Physiol 64: 499–501Google Scholar
  26. Reich P, Hinckley T (1980) Water relations, soil fertility, and plant nutrient composition of a pygmy oak ecosystem. Ecol 61: 400–416Google Scholar
  27. Ritchie G, Hinckley T (1975) The pressure chamber as an instrument for ecological research. Adv Ecol Res 9: 165–254Google Scholar
  28. Simpson J, Fritschen L, Walker R (1985) Estimating stomatal diffusion for Douglas-fir, lodgepole pine and white oak under light saturated conditions. Agric Meteorol 33: 299–313Google Scholar
  29. Thompson D, Hinckley T (1977) A simulation of water relations of white oak based on soil moisture and atmospheric evaporative demand. Can J For Res 7: 400–409Google Scholar
  30. Turner N, Schulze E, Gollan T (1984) The response of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapour pressure deficits and soil water content. Oecologica 63: 338–342Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger K. Kjelgren
    • 1
  • James R. Clark
    • 1
  1. 1.The Center for Urban HorticultureUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations