Skip to main content
Log in

Gastrointestinal radiology: Current indications and referral patterns

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine the current indications and referral patterns for routine gastrointestinal radiology examinations, 1000 consecutive patients were prospectively analyzed. The following specialties were the largest sources of referral: general internal medicine (38%), gastroenterology (21%), and general and colorectal surgery (17%). Referrals from gastroenterologists were weighted toward areas not well evaluated by endoscopy, such as suspected small bowel disease. The major indications for upper gastrointestinal (GI) examinations were dysphagia and swallowing disorders (32%), hiatus hernia/reflux (14%), and ulcer (14%). Small bowel series were predominantly performed for inflammatory bowel disease (37%), obstruction (25%), and occult blood loss (18%). The majority of combined upper GI/small bowel studies were performed for indications primarily relating to the small bowel. Forty percent of barium enemas were performed for detection of neoplasms and polyps, with pain/irritable colon (14%) and exclusion of leak (14%) the next most common indications. Traditional indications, such as peptic ulcer disease and neoplastic disease, continue to be sources of referral for gastrointestinal radiology. However, more specialized applications, particularly in areas not well suited to endoscopy, such as swallowing disorders, inflammatory disease of the small bowel, and evaluation of surgical anastomoses, are also being commonly used. The changing indications, along with the previously documented decreased volume of gastrointestinal radiologic procedures, should be kept in mind when planning a radiology resident educational curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gelfand DW, Ott DJ, Chen YM. Decreasing numbers of gastrointestinal studies: report of data from 69 radiologic practices. AJR 1987;148:1133–1136

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goodson JD, Lehmann JW, Colditz GA, et al. The diagnostic value of upper gastrointestinal radiography. J Clin Gastroenterol 1990;12:140–144

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen MYM, Ott DJ, Kelley TF, Gelfand KW. Impact of the small bowel study on patient management. Gastrointest Radiol 1991;16:189–192

    Google Scholar 

  4. Diner WC, Hoskins EOL, Navab F. Radiologic examination of the small intestine: review of 402 cases and discussion of indications and methods. South Med J 1984;77:68–75

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maglinte DDT, Lappas JC, Kelvin FM, et al. Small bowel radiography: how, when, and why? Radiology 1987;163:297–305

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fried AM, Poulos A, Hatfield DR. The effectiveness of the incidental small-bowel series. Radiology 1981;140:45–46

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rex DK, Lappas JC, Maglinte DDT, Kelvin FM. Barium enema utilization within a defined geographic region: a survey. Gastrointest Radiol 1990;15:265–267

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vellacott KD, Virjee J. Audit on the use of the barium enema. Gut 1986;27:182–185

    Google Scholar 

  9. Margulis AR, Thoeni RF. The present status of the radiologic examination of the colon. Radiology 1988;167:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thoeni RF, Margulis AR. The state of radiographic technique in the examination of the colon: a survey in 1987. Radiology 1988;167:7–12

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gelfand DW. Gastrointestinal radiology: a short history and predictions for the future. AJR 1988; 150:727–730

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Einstein, D.M., Lieberman, J.M., Paushter, D.M. et al. Gastrointestinal radiology: Current indications and referral patterns. Abdom Imaging 18, 2–6 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00201689

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00201689

Key words

Navigation