Skip to main content
Log in

Entity and antinomy in Tibetan bsdus grwa logic (part I)

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Barlingay, S. S. (1965). A Modern Introduction to Indian Logic. Delhi: National Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays, Paul (1937). ‘A System of Axiomatic Set Theory - Part I’, J. of Symbolic Logic 2: 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocheński, I. M. (1961). A History of Formal Logic, New York: Chelsea Publ. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conze, Edward (1967). Buddhist Thought in India, Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, Gerald (1979). Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, Margaret (1984). Argumentation and Understanding: A Study of Tibetan Religious Debate. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, Douglas R. (1980). Gödel, Esher, Bach: An Eternal Gold Braid, New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, Paul Jeffrey (1973). Meditation an Emptiness, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • 'Jam-dbya\(dot n\)s Phyogs-lha-'od-zer (1980). Rwa sTod bsDus grwa, Dharamsala, H. P., India: Damchoe Sangpo, Library of Tibetan Works and Archives.

  • Lobsang Tharchin, Geshe (1979). The Logic and Debate Tradition of India, Tibet, and Mongolia - History, Reader, Resources - Howell, New Jersey: Rashi Gempil Ling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukasiewicz, Jan (1957). Aristotle's Syllogistic, Oxford: Clarendon Press (Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matilal, Bimal Krishna (1968). The Navya-Nyāya Doctrine of Negation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Harvard Oriental Series, Vol. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murti, T. R. V. (1955). The Central Philosophy of Buddhism. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phur bu lchog byam pa tshul khyims rgya mtsho. n.d.a. Introductory Yongs 'dzin bsdus grwa. Full name: Tshad ma'i gzhung don 'byed pa'i bsdus grwa'i rnam bzhag brigs lam 'phrul gyi lde mig ces bya ba las rigs lam chung ngu'i rnam par bshad pa bzhugs so. Tashi Jong H. P., India: Tashi Jong Xylograph Edition.

  • Phur bu lchog byam pa tshul khyims rgya mtsho. (n.d.b). Intermediate Yongs 'dzin bsdus grwa. Full name: Tshad ma'i gzhung don 'byed pa'i bsdus grwa'i rnam par bshad pa rigs lam 'phrul gyi lde mig ces bya ba las rigs lam 'bring gi skor bzhugs so. Tashi Jong H. P. India: Tashi Jong Xylograph Edition.

  • Sierksma, Fokke (1964). ‘Rtsod-Pa: The Monachal Disputations in Tibet’, Indo-Iranian Journ., VIII: 130–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stcherbatsky, F. Th. (1930). Buddhist Logic. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, Patrick (1960). Axiomatic Set Theory. Princeton, New Jersey: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlastos, Gregory (1967). ‘Zeno of Elea’, in Paul Edwards (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 8: 369–379. New York: Macmillan Co. and The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vostrikov, A. (1935). ‘Some Corrections and Critical Remarks on Dr. Johan Van Manen's Contribution to the Bibliography of Tibet’, Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies (University of London) Vol. VIII: 51–76.

  • Wayman, Alex (1958). ‘The Rules of Debate According to Asa\(dot n\)ga’, J. of the American Oriental Society 78: 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goldberg, M. Entity and antinomy in Tibetan bsdus grwa logic (part I). J Indian Philos 13, 153–199 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00200263

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00200263

Navigation