Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of kinematic invariances of multijoint reaching movement

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a no unique relationship between the trajectory of the hand, represented in cartesian or extrinsic space, and its trajectory in joint angle or intrinsic space in the general condition of joint redundancy. The goal of this work is to analyze the relation between planning the trajectory of a multijoint movement in these two coordinate systems. We show that the cartesian trajectory can be planned based on the task parameters (target coordinates, etc.) prior to and independently of angular trajectories. Angular time profiles are calculated from the cartesian trajectory to serve as a basis for muscle control commands. A unified differential equation that allows planning trajectories in cartesian and angular spaces simultaneously is proposed. Due to joint redundancy, each cartesian trajectory corresponds to a family of angular trajectories which can account for the substantial variability of the latter. A set of strategies for multijoint motor control following from this model is considered; one of them coincides with the frog wiping reflex model and resolves the kinematic inverse problem without inversion. The model trajectories exhibit certain properties observed in human multijoint reaching movements such as movement equifinality, straight end-point paths, bell-shaped tangential velocity profiles, speed-sensitive and speed-insensitive movement strategies, peculiarities of the response to double-step targets, and variations of angular trajectory without variations of the limb end-point trajectory in cartesian space. In humans, those properties are almost independent of limb configuration, target location, movement duration, and load. In the model, these properties are invariant to an affine transform of cartesian space. This implies that these properties are not a special goal of the motor control system but emerge from movement kinematics that reflect limb geometry, dynamics, and elementary principles of motor control used in planning. All the results are given analytically and, in order to compare the model with experimental results, by computer simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abend W, Bizzi E, Morasso P (1982) Human arm trajectory formation. Brain 105:331–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert A (1972) Regression and the Moor-Penrose pseudoinverse. Boston University. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbib MA (1981) Perceptual structures and distributed motor control. In: Brooks VB (eds) Handbook of physiology, Sect 1. The nervous system, Vol 2. Motor control. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 1449–1480

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkeson CG (1989) Learning arm kinematics and dynamics. Annu Rev Neurosci 12:157–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkeson CG, Hollerbach JM (1985) Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. J Neurosci 5:2318–2330

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker DR, Wampler CW (1988) On the inverse kinematics of redundant manipulators. Int. J Robotics Res 7:3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman R (1960) Introduction to matrix analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkinblit MB, Feldman AG, Fukson OI (1986a) Adaptability of innate motor patterns and motor control mechanisms. Behav Brain Sci 9:585–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkinblit MB, Gelfand IM, Feldman AG (1986b) A model for the control of multijoint movements. Biophizika 31:128–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkinblit MB, Gelfand IM, Feldman AG (1986c) A model for the aiming phase of the wiping reflex. In: Grillner S, Stein PSG, Stuart D, Forssberg H, Herman RM (eds) Neurobiology of vertebrate locomotion. Wenner-Gren International Symposium Series 45:217–227

  • Bernstein NA (1935) The problem of interrelation between coordination and localization (in Russian). Arch Biol Sci 38:1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein NA (1967) The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizzi E, Polit A, Morasso P (1976) Mechanisms underlying achievement of final head position. J Neurophysiol 39:435–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock D, Grossberg S (1988) Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation. Psychol Rev 95:49–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole KJ, Abbs JH (1986) Coordination of three-joint digit movements for rapid finger-thumb grasp. J Neurophysiol 55:101–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcos DM, Gottlieb GL, Agarwal GC (1989) Organizing principles for single joint movements. II. A speed-sensitive strategy. J Neurophysiol 62:358–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcos DM, Gutman SR, Agarwal GC, Gottlieb GL (1990) Movement strategies and the necessity for task differentiation. Behav Brain Sci 14:359–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruse H, Wischmeyer E, Bruer M, Brockfield M, Dress A (1990) On the cost functions for the control of the human arm movement. Biol Cybern 62:519–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruse H, Bruer M, Dean J (1993) Control of three- and four-joint arm movement: strategy for a manipulator with redundant degrees of freedom. J Motor Behav 25:131–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG (1986) Once more on the equilibrium hypothesis (λ-model) for motor control. J Motor Behav 18:17–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG, Adamovich SV, Ostry DJ, Flanagan JR (1990) The origin of electromyograms-explanations based on the equilibrium point hypothesis. In: Winters JM, Woo SL-Y (eds) Multiple muscle systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 195–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movements. J Exp Psychol 47:103–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JR, Ostry DJ, Feldman AG (1993) Control of trajectory modifications in target-directed reaching. J Motor Behav 25:140–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Flash T (1987) The control of hand equilibrium trajectories in multijoint arm movements. Biol Cybern 57:257–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Flash T (1989) Speed-insensitive and speed-sensitive strategies in miltijoint movements. Behav Brain Sci 2:215–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Flash T (1990) The organization of human arm trajectory control. In: Winter JM, Woo SL-Y (eds) Multiple muscle systems. Biomechanics and movement organization. Springer, New York, 282–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Flash T, Henis E (1992) Arm trajectory modification during reaching toward visual targets. J Cogn Neurosci 3:220–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Flash T, Hogan N (1985) The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5:1688–1703

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgopulos AP, Kalaska JF, Massey JT (1981) Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: effects of practice, uncertainty, and change in target location. J Neurophysiol 46:725–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman SR (1995) Inverse kinematic problem: solutions by pseudo-inversion, inversion, and no-inversion, Behav Brain Sci (in press)

  • Gottlieb DH (1986) Topology and robots. Proc IEEE Int Conf on Robotic and Automation 3:1689–1691

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, Corcos DM, Agarwal GC (1989a) Strategies for the control of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom. Behav Brain Sci 12:189–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, Corcos DM, Agarwal GC (1989b) Organizing principles for single joint movements. I. A speed-insensitive strategy. J Neurophysiol 63:342–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Granit R (1985) Comments on time in action and perception. Hum Neurobiol 4:61–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Green PH (1972) Problems of organization of motor system. In: Rosen R, Shell FM (eds) Progress in theoretical biology Vol 2. Academic Press, New York, 303–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman SR, Gottlieb GL (1992a) Virtual trajectory as a solution of the inverse dynamic problem. Behav Brain Sci 15:752–754

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman SR, Gottlieb GL (1992b) Basic functions of variability of simple pre-planned movements. Biol Cybern 68:63–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman SR, Gottlieb G, Corcos D (1990) Exponential model of a reaching movement trajectory with nonlinear time. Comment Theor Biol 2:357–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman SR, Latash ML, Almeida GL, Gottlieb GL (1993) Kinematic description of variability of fast movements: analytical and experimental approaches. Biol Cybern 69:485–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan Z (1986a) Do subprograms for movements always seek equilibrium? Behav Brain Sci 9:609–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan Z (1986b) Optimized movement trajectories and joint stiffness in unperturbed, inertially loaded movements. Biol Cybern 53:373–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Henis E, Flash T (1989) Mechanisms subserving arm trajectory modification. Perception 18:495

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick CL (1898) Physiological corollaries of the equilibrium theory of nervous action and control. J Comp Neurol February: 21–31

  • Hogan N (1985) The mechanics of multi-joint posture and movement. Biol Cybern 52:315–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan N, Winters JM (1990) Principles underlying movement organization: upper limb. In: Winters JM, Woo SL-Y (eds) Multiple muscle systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollerbach JM, Atkinson CG (1987) Deducing planning variables from experimental arm trajectories: pitfalls and possibilities. Biol Cybern 56:279–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollerbach JM, Flash T (1982) Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movements. Biol Cybern 44:67–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong D, Corcos DM, Gottlieb GL (1994) Task patterns of muscle activation at the shoulder and elbow for unconstrained arm movements. J Neurophysiol 71:

  • Klein CA, Huang CH (1983) Review of pseudo inverse control for use with kinematically redundant manipulators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC 13:245–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Knatib O (1985) Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. Proc Int Conf Rob Autom, pp 500–505

  • Krueger LE (1989) Reconciling Fechner and Stevens: toward a unified psychophysical law. Behav Brain Sci 12:251

    Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML (1993) Control of human movement. Human Kinetics Publisher, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Gutman SR (1993) Variability of fast single joint movements and the equilibrium point hypothesis. In: Newell K, Corcos D (eds) Variability in motor control. Human Kinetics, Urbana, pp 157–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Liegeois A (1977) Automatic supervisory control of the configuration and behavior of multibody mechanisms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-7:868–870

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin DP, Baillieul J, Hollerbach JM (1989) Resolution of kinematic redundancy using optimization technique. IEEE Trans Rob Autom 5:529–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey JT, Lurito JT, Pellizzer G, Georgopoulos AP (1992) Three-dimensional drawings in isometric conditions: relation between geometry and kinematics. Exp Brain Res 88:685–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer OG, Wagenaar RC, Blankendaal FCM (1988) The hierarchy debate: tema con variazioni. In: Meijer OG, Roth K (eds) Complex movement behaviour: ‘the’ motor-action controversy, Elsevier Science (North-Holland), Amsterdam pp 489–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulen van der JHP, Gooskens RHJM, Denier van der Gon JJ, Gielen CCAM, Wilhelm K (1990) Mechanisms underlying accuracy in fast goal-directed arm movements in man. J Mot Behav 22:67–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Morasso P (1981) Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42:223–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Morasso P (1983) Three-dimensional arm trajectories. Biol Cybern 48:187–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Morasso P, Zaccaria R (1988) Kinematic networks. A distributed model for representing and regularizing motor redundancy. Biol Cybern 60:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagasaki H (1989) Asymmetric velocity and acceleration profiles of human arm movements. Exp Brain Res 74:319–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y, Nanafusa H, Yoshikawa T (1987) Task-priority based redundancy control of robot manipulators. Int J Rob Res 6:3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson WL (1983) Physical principles for economies of skilled movements. Biol Cybern 46:135–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Plamondon R, Alimi AM, Yergeau P, Leclerc F (1993) Modeling velocity profiles of rapid movements: a comparative study. Biol Cybern 69:119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Flanders M (1992) Moving in three-dimensional space: frames of reference, vectors and coordinate systems. Annu Rev Neurosci 15:167

    Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Lacquaniti F (1981) Invariant characteristics of a pointing movement in man. J Neurosci 1:710–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Terzuolo SA (1987) Organization of arm movements. Wrist motion is piecewise planar. Neuroscience 23:53–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein RB, Oguztoreli MN, Capaday C (1986) What is optimized in muscular movements? In: Jones NL, McMartney N, McComas AJ (eds) Human muscle power. Human Kinetics, Champaign, 131–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey MT (1977) Preliminaries to a theory of action with reference to vision. In: Show N, Bransford J (eds) Perceiving, acting, and knowing: toward an ecological psychology. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey MT (1990) The challenge of a physical account of action: a personal view. In: Whiting HTA, Meijer OG, Van Wieringen PCW (eds) The natural-physical approach to movement control. VU University Press, Amsterdam pp 58–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Viviani P, Terzuolo C (1980) Space-time invariance in learned motor skill. In: Stelmach GE, Requin J (eds) Tutorial motor behav. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 525–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting HTA (1984) Human motor actions: Bernstein reassessed. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney DE (1969) Resolved motion rate control of manipulators and human prostheses. IEEE Trans Man Machine Syst MMS-10:47–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney DE (1972) The mathematics of coordinated control of prosthetic arms and manipulators. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. December: 303–309

  • Yoshikawa T (1985) Manipulability of robotic mechanisms. Int J Rob Res 4:3–9

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physiology, Rush Medical College, 60612, Chicago, IL, USA

    Simon R. Goodman

  2. Department of Bioengineering, Boston University, 02215, Boston, MA, USA

    Gerald L. Gottlieb

Authors
  1. Simon R. Goodman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gerald L. Gottlieb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodman, S.R., Gottlieb, G.L. Analysis of kinematic invariances of multijoint reaching movement. Biol. Cybern. 73, 311–322 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00199467

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00199467

Keywords

Search

Navigation