Abstract
A minimum mean square error (MMSE) estimation scheme is employed to identify the synaptic connectivity in neural networks. This new approach can substantially reduce the amount of data and the computational cost involved in the conventional correlation methods, and is suitable for both nonstationary and stationary neuronal firings. Two algorithms are proposed to estimate the synaptic connectivities recursively, one for nonlinear filtering, the other for linear filtering. In addition, the lower and upper bounds for the MMSE estimator are determined. It is shown that the estimators are consistent in quadratic mean. We also demonstrate that the conventional cross-interval histogram is an asymptotic linear MMSE estimator with an inappropriate initial value. Finally, simulations of both nonlinear and linear (Kalman filter) estimates demonstrate that the true connectivity values are approached asymptotically.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berger T (1971) Rate distortion theory. Prentice-Hall, New York
Boogaard HFP van den (1987) Maximum likelihood estimations in a nonlinear self-exciting point process model. Biol Cybern 55:219–225
Boogaard HFP van den, Hesselmans GHFM, Johannesma PIM (1986) System identification based on point processes and correlation densities. I. The nonrefractory neuron model. Math Biosci 80:143–171
Borisyuk GN, Borisyuk RM, Kirillov AB, Kovalenko EI, Kryukov VI (1985) A new statistical method for identifying interconnections between neuronal network elements. Biol Cybern 52:301–306
Brillinger DR (1975) The identification of point process systems. Ann Probab 3:909–929
Brillinger DR (1988) Maximum likelihood analysis of spike trains of interacting nerve cells. Biol Cybern 59:189–200
Chornoboy ES, Schramm LP, Karr AF (1988) Maximum likelihood identification of neural point process systems. Biol Cybern 59:265–275
Correia MJ, Landolt JP (1977) A point process analysis of the spontaneous activity of anterior semicircular canal units in the anesthetized pigeon. Biol Cybern 27:199–213
Gerstein GL (1970) Functional association of neurons: detection and interpretation. In: Schmitt FO (ed) The neurosciences second study program. Rockefeller Univeristy Press, New York, pp 648–661
Habib S (1985) Non-stationary stochastic point-process models in neurophysiology with applications to learning. In: Sen PK (ed) Biostatistics: statistics in biomedical, public health and environmental sciences. Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 481–509
Hero AO (1989) Lower bounds on estimator performance for energy-invariant parameters of multidimensional Poisson processes. IEEE Trans Inform Theory 35:843–858
Knox CK (1974) Cross-correlation functions for a neuronal model. Biophys J 14:567–582
Larson HJ, Shubert BO (1979) Probabilistic models in engineering sciences, vol II: Random noise, signals, and dynamic systems. Wiley, New York
Macchi O, Picinbono B (1972) Estimation and detection of weak optical signals. IEEE Trans Inform Theory 5:562–573
Melseen WJ, Epping WJM (1987) Detection and estimation of neural connectivity based on cross-correlation analysis. Biol Cybern 57:403–414
Ogata Y (1978) The asymptotic behavior of maximum likelihood estimators for stationary point processes. Ann Inst Stat Math Part A 30:243–261
Snyder DL (1975) Random point processes. Wiley, New York
Srinath MD, Rajasekaran PK (1979) An introduction to statistical signal processing with applications. Wiley, New York
Yang X (1989) Detection and classification of neural signals and identification of neural networks. Ph.D. Thesis, Electrical Engineering Department, University of Maryland
Yang X, Shamma SA (1990a) Identification of synaptic connectivity using hidden Markov model. Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Washington DC, pp 1–259
Yang X, Shamma SA (1990b) Identification of connectivity in neural networks. Biophys J 57:987–999
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, X., Shamma, S.A. Minimum mean square error estimation of connectivity in biological neural networks. Biol. Cybern. 65, 171–179 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00198088
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00198088