Abstract
A new method of interpreting the signals from triple-sensor thermal anemometer probes has been developed based on fast solution for all the roots of the non-linear Jorgensen (1971) equations describing the directional response of each cylindrical sensor. The sensors can be oriented at arbitrary angles to each other, but always within a range of probe geometries that keep prong interference and thermal wake interference below acceptable levels. The properties of a class of non-orthogonal symmetric tetrahedral probe geometries are studied in relation to the range of flow vector angles that can be measured, the sensitivity of the probe with respect to changes in flow angle, and the sensitivity of the computed velocity components due to angular errors associated with the construction of the probe. The solutions of Jorgensen's equations are inherently multiple-valued, but if the velocity vector is restricted to be within a cone of angles, they are unique. It is shown that measurements with non-orthogonal triple sensor signals are sensitive to angular deviations of a few degrees of the sensor angles from the nominally orthogonal probe geometry, indicating the need of a non-orthogonal algorithm. The mean, rms, Reynolds stress, and power spectrum of the velocity in fully developed turbulent pipe flow were measured using a specially designed triple sensor probe and the proposed algorithm.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adrian, R. J.; Johnson, R. E.; Jones, B. G.; Merati, P.; Tung, T. C. 1984: Aerodynamic disturbances of hot wire probes and directional sensitivity. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 17, 62–71
Acrivlellis, M. 1980: Measurements by means of triple-sensor probes. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 13, 986–992
Butler, T. L.; Wagner, J. W. 1983: Application of a three-sensor hot-wire probe for incompressible flow. AIAA J. 21, 726–732
Champagne, F. H.; Sleicher, C. A.; Wehrmann, O. H. 1967: Turbulence measurements with inclined hot-wires. Part 1: Heat transfer experiments with inclined hot wire. J. Fluid Mech. 28, 153–176
Chang, P. H.; Adrian, R. J.; Jones, B. G. 1983: Comparison between triple-wire and X-wire measurement techniques in high intensity turbulent shear flows. 8th Biennial Symposium on Turbulence, Univ. of Missouri-Rolla, USA
Fingerson, L. M. 1968: Practical extensions of anemometer techniques. In: Melnik, W. L.; Weske, J. R. (eds.) Advances in hotwire anemometry, pp. 258–275. University of Maryland
Hinze, J. O. 1959: Turbulence, an introduction to its mechanism and theory. New York: McGraw-Hill
Irwin, J. P. A. 1971: The longitudinal cooling convection for wires inclined to the prongs and some turbulence measurements in fully developed pipe flow. Mech. Eng. Research Lab., McGill Univ., Rep. no. TN-72-1
Jorgensen, F. E. 1971: Directional sensitivity of wire and fiber film probes. DISA Inform. 11, 31–37
Kawall, J. G.; Shokr, M.; Keffer, J. F. 1983: A digital technique for the simultaneous measurement of streamwise and lateral velocities in turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 133, 83–112
Lekakis, I. C. 1988: Coherent structures in fully developed turbulent pipe flow. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Mathioudakis, K.; Breugelmans, F. A. E. 1985: Use of triple hot wires to measure unsteady flows with large direction changes. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 18, 414–419
Mobarak, A.; Sedrak, M. F.; El Telbany, M. M. 1986: On the direction sensitivity of hot-wire probes. Dantec Inform. 2, 7–9
Morrison, W. R. B.; Kronauer, R. E. 1969: Structural similarity for fully developed turbulence in smooth tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 39, 117–141
Newmark, S. 1965: Solution of cubic and quartic equations. Washington/DC: Pergamon
Perry, A. E.; Abell, C. J. 1975: Scaling laws for pipe-flow trubulence. J. Fluid Mech. 67, 257–271
Powe, R. E. 1971: Turbulence structure in smooth and rough pipes. Ph.D. Thesis, Montana State University, USA
Salzer, H. E. 1960: A note on the solution of quartic equations. Math. Comput. 14, 279–281
Sanborn, V. A.; Seegmiller, H. L. 1976: Evaluation of mean and turbulent velocity measurements in subsonic accelerated boundary layers. NASA TM-62
Spencer, B. W. 1970: Statistical investigation of turbulent velocity and pressure fields in a two-stream layer. Ph.D. thesis, Nuclear Engineering Program, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Tutu, N. K.; Chevray, R. 1975: Cross-wire anemometer in high intensity turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 71, 785–800
Vagt, J.-D. 1979: Hot-wire probes in low speed flow. Prog. Aerospace Sci. 18, 271–323
Webster, C. A. G. 1962: A note on the sensitivity to yaw of a hot-wire anemometer. J. Fluid Mech. 13, 307–312
Wyngaard, T. C. 1968: Measurement of small-scale turbulence structure with hot wires. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum, 1, 1105–1108
Yavuzkurt, S.; Crawford, E.; Moffat, R. J. 1977: Real-time hot-wire measurement in three-dimensional flow. 5th biennial symp. on turbulence, Univ. of Missouri-Rolla, USA
Zank, I. 1981: Sources of errors and running calibration of three-dimensional hot-film anemometers especially near the sea surface. DISA Inform. 26, 11–18
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Presently with the Dept. of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Iowa
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lekakis, I.C., Adrian, R.J. & Jones, B.G. Measurement of velocity vectors with orthogonal and non-orthogonal triple-sensor probes. Experiments in Fluids 7, 228–240 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00198002
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00198002