Abstract
This report describes the calibration of a non-nulling, conical, seven-hole pressure probe over a large range of flow onset angles. The calibration procedure is based on the use of differential pressures to determine the three components of velocity. The method allows determination of the flow angle and velocity magnitude to within an average error of 1.0° and 1.0% respectively. Greater accuracy can be achieved by using high quality pressure transducers. Also included is an examination of the factors which limit the use of the probe, a description of the measurement chain, an error analysis, and a typical experimental result. In addition, a new general analytical model of pressure probe behavior is described and the validity of the model is demonstrated by comparing it with experimentally measured calibration data for a three-hole yaw meter and a sevenhole probe.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A n :
-
least-squares curve-fit coefficients
- C p :
-
pressure coefficient, \(C_p = \left( {P - P_\infty } \right)/\left( {1/2\varrho U_\infty ^2 } \right)\)
- \(C_{p....} \) :
-
multihole probe pressure coefficients
- c :
-
A-D counts
- e :
-
a measurement-system dependent quantity
- F :
-
equation of probe surface
- h :
-
manometer height
- P :
-
pressure
- r, θ, z. :
-
probe-cylindrical coordinate directions
- R :
-
distance to probe surface in r-direction, or a result of a measurement
- u, v, w :
-
velocity components in x, y, z-directions
- U :
-
freestream velocity
- x, y, z :
-
right-hand Cartesian coordinate directions
- α:
-
multihole probe angle of attack
- β:
-
sideslip angle for multihole probe
- γ:
-
cocked-probe stem angle
- ζ:
-
angle between x-axis and freestream flow direction
- η:
-
circumferential pressure tap location
- θ:
-
pitch angle for multihole probe
- ν:
-
air kinematic viscosity
- ξ:
-
transformed circumferential coordinate
- ρ:
-
air density
- Φ:
-
velocity potential
- χ:
-
angle of rotation
- ψ:
-
yaw angle for multihole probe
- d :
-
probe or cylinder diameter
- m :
-
manometer
- n :
-
pressure probe hole or sector number
- ref:
-
reference value
- z :
-
zero applied pressure difference
- total:
-
freestream total pressure
- static:
-
freestream static pressure
- ∞:
-
refers to freestream conditions
References
Akima, H. 1978.: A method of bivariate interpolation and smooth surface fitting for irregularly distributed data points. ACM Trans. Math. Software 4, vol. 2, 148
Brayer, D. W.; Pankhurst, R. C. 1971: Pressure-probe methods for determining wind speed and flow direction. Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London
Everett, K. N.; Gerner, A. A.; Durston, D. A. 1982: Theory and calibration of non-nulling seven-hole cone probes for use in complex flow measurement. AIAA Pap. 82-0232
Everett, K. N.; Gerner, A. A.; Durston, D. A. 1983: Seven-hole cone probes for high angle flow measurement: theory and calibration. AIAA J. 21, 992
Gallington, R. W. 1980: Measurement of very large flow angles with non-nulling seven-hole probes. USAFA-TR-80-17
Gerner, A. A.; Maurer, C. L. 1982: Calibration of seven-hole probes suitable for high angles in subsonic compressible flows. AIAA Pap. 82-0410
Hess, J. L.; Smith, A. M. O. 1966: Calculation of the potential flow about arbitrary bodies. In: Progress in aeronautical sciences, vol. 8, pp. 1–138. New York: Pergamon
Huffman, D. G. 1981: Theory, performance and design of flow direction and Mach number probes. AFATL-TR-81-44
Huffman, D. G.; Rabe, D. C.; Pod, N. D. 1980: Flow direction probes from a theoretical and experimental point of view. J. Phys. E: 13, 751
Johnson, F. T.; Erickson, L. L. 1979: A general panel method for the analysis and design of arbitrary configurations in incompressible flows. NASA CR-3079
Karamcheti, K. 1966: Principles of ideal-fluid aerodynamics. New York: Wiley
Krause, L. N.; Dudzindki, T. J. 1969: Flow-direction measurement with fixed position probes in subsonic flows over a range of Reynolds number. NASA TMX-52576
Matthews, C. W. 1952: A comparison of the experimental subsonic pressure distributions about several bodies of revolution with pressure distributions computed by means of the linearized theory. NACA TN 2519
Moffat, R. J. 1982: Contributions to the theory of single-sample uncertainty analysis. Trans. ASME, 104, 250
Sitaram, N.; Treaster, A. L. 1985: A simplified method of using four-hole probes to measure three-dimensional flow fields. J. Fluids Eng. 107, 31
Smith, A. M. O.; Bauer, A. B. 1970: Static-pressure probes that are theoretically insensitive to pitch, yaw and Mach number. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 513
Treaster, A. L.; Yocum, A. M. 1979: The calibration and application of five-hole probes. ISA Trans. 18, 23
Westphal, R. V.; Pauley, W. R.; Eaton, J. K. 1987: Interaction between a vortex and a turbulent boundary layer. Part 1: Mean flow evolution and turbulence properties. NASA TM-88361
Zilliac, G. G. 1989: Computational/experimental study of the flowfield on a body of revolution at incidence. AIAA J. 27, 1008–1016
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zilliac, G.G. Modelling, calibration, and error analysis of seven-hole pressure probes. Experiments in Fluids 14, 104–120 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196994
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196994