Abstract
An experimental study of a swirling turbulent flow through a curved pipe with a pipetomeanbend radius ratio of 0.077 and a flow Reynolds number based on pipe diameter and mean bulk velocity of 50,000 has been carried out. A rotating section, six pipe diameters long, is set up at six diameters upstream of the curved bend entrance. The rotating section is designed to provide a solidbody rotation to the flow. At the entrance of the rotating section, a fullydeveloped turbulent pipe flow is established. This study reports on the flow characteristics for the case where the swirl number, defined as the ratio of the pipe circumferential velocity to mean bulk velocity, is one. Wall static pressures, mean velocities, Reynolds stresses and wall shear distribution around the pipe are measured using pressure transducers, rotatingwires and surface hotfilm gauges. The measurements are used to analyze the competing effects of swirl and bend curvature on curvedpipe flows, particularly their influence on the secondary flow pattern in the crossstream plane of the curved pipe. At this swirl number, all measured data indicate that, besides the decaying combined free and forced vortex, there are no secondary cells present in the crossstream plane of the curved pipe. Consequently, the flow displays characteristics of axial symmetry and the turbulent normal stress distributions are more uniform across the pipe compared to fullydeveloped pipe flows.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Abbreviations
 B :

calibration constant
 e :

bridge voltage
 e _{0} :

bridge voltage at zero flow
 C _{f} :

total skin friction coefficient, = 2 τ _{w}/ρ W ^{2}_{0}
 D :

pipe diameter, = 7.62 cm
 De :

Dean number, = α ^{1/2} Re
 M :

angular momentum
 n :

calibration constant
 N _{s} :

swirl number, = ΩD/2 W _{0}
 r :

radial coordinate
 R :

mean bend radius of curvature, = 49.5 cm
 Re :

pipe Reynolds number, = DW _{0}/ν
 S :

axial coordinate along the upstream (measured negative) and downstream (measured positive) tangent
 U, V, W :

mean velocities along the radial, tangential and axial directions, respectively
 u, v, w :

mean fluctuating velocities along the radial, tangential and axial directions, respectively
 u′, v′, w′ :

root mean square normal stress along the radial, tangential and axial directions, respectively
 v ^{{ov2}}, u^{{ov2}} :

normal stress along the tangential and radial direction, respectively
 W _{0} :

mean bulk velocity, ∼ 10 m/s
 W _{c} W:

measured at pipe axis
 W _{τ} :

total wall friction velocity, \(\sqrt {\left( {\tau _w /\varrho } \right)} \)
 \(\left( {w_\tau } \right)_s \) :

total wall friction velocity measured at S/D = 18
 ū,v vw, w7#x016B;:

turbulent shear stresses
 α :

pipetomeanbend radius ratio, = D/2 R = 0.077
 θ :

axial coordinate measured from bend entrance
 θ :

fluid kinematic viscosity
 ρ :

fluid density
 τ _{w} :

mean total wall shear stress
 \(\tilde \tau _w \) :

instantaneous total wall shear
 ψ :

azimuthal coordinate measured zero from pipe hori zontal diameter near outer bend
 Ω :

angular speed of the rotating section
References
Agrawal, Y.; Talbot, L.; Gong, K. 1978: Laser anemometer study of flow development in curved circular pipes. J. Fluid Mech. 85, 497–578
Akiyama, H.; Hanaoka, Y.; Cheng, K. C; Urai, I.; Suzuki, M. 1983: Visual measurements of laminar flow in the entry region of a curved pipe. Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. Flow visualization, Ann Arbor (ed. Yang, W. J.), 756–760
Anwer, M. 1989: Rotating turbulent flow through a 180° pipe bend. PhD thesis, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
Anwer, M.; So, R. M. C. 1989: Rotation effects on a fullydeveloped turbulent pipe flow. Exp. Fluids 8, 33–40
Anwer, M.; So, R. M. C. 1990: Frequency of sublayer bursting in a curved bend. J. Fluid Mech. 210, 415–435
Anwer, M.; So, R. M. C.; Lai, Y. G. 1989: Perturbation by and recovery from bend curvature of a fully developed turbulent pipe flow. Phys. Fluids A1, 1387–1397
Azzola, J.; Humphrey, J. A. C.; lacovides, H.; Launder, B. E. 1986: Developing turbulent flow in a Ubend of circular crosssection: measurement and computation. J. Fluids Eng. 43, 771–783
Berger, S. A.; Talbot, L.; Yao, L. S. 1983: Flow in curved pipes. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 15, 471–512
Bissonnette, L. R.; Mellor, G. L. 1974: Experiments on the behavior of an axisymmetric turbulent boundary layer with a sudden circumferential strain. J. Fluid Mech. 63, 369–413
Bradshaw, P. 1987: Turbulent secondary flows. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 19, 53–74
Cheng, K. C.; Yuen, F. P. 1987: Flow visualization studies on secondary flow patterns in straight tubes downstream of a 180 degree bend and in isothermally heated horizontal tubes. J. Heat Transfer 109, 49–54
Cheng, K. C.; Inaba, T.; Akiyama, M. 1983: Flow visualization studies of secondary flow patterns and centrifugal instability in curved circular and semicircular pipes. Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. Flow Visualization, Ann Arbor (ed. Yang, W. J.), 531–536
Choi, U. S.; Talbot, L.; Cornet, I. 1979: Experimental study of wall shear rates in the entry region of a curved tube. J. Fluid Mech. 93, 465–489
Daskopoulos, P.; Lenhoff, A. M. 1989: Flow in curved ducts: bifurcation structure for stationary ducts. J. Fluid Mech. 203, 125–148
Dean, W. R. 1928: Fluid motion in a curved channel. Proc. R. Soc. 121 A, 402 420
Enayet, M. M.; Gibson, M. M.; Taylor, A. M. K. P.; Yianneskis, M. 1982: LaserDoppler measurements of laminar and turbulent flow in a pipe bend. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 3, 213–219
Kikuyama, K.; Murakami, M.; Nishibori, K. 1983: Development of threedimensional turbulent boundary layer in axially rotating pipe. J. Fluids Eng. 105, 154–160
Kitoh, O. 1987: Swirling flow through a bend. J. Fluid Mech. 175, 429–446
Lai, Y. G.; So, R. M. C.; Anwer, M.; Hwang, B. C. 1991a: Calculations of a curvedpipe flow using Reynoldsstress closures. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 205, 231–244
Lai, Y. G.; So, R. M. C.; Zhang, H. S. 1991b: Turbulencedriven secondary flows in a curved pipe. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 3, 163–180
Laufer, J. 1954: The structure of turbulence in fully developed pipe flow. NACA Rep. No. 1174
Launder, B. E. 1989: Secondmoment closure: present... and future? Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 10, 282–300
Nandakumar, K.; Masliyah, J. H. 1982: Bifurcation in steady laminar flow through curved tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 150, 139–158
Olson, D. E.; Snyder, B. 1985: The upstream scale of flow development in curved circular pipes. J. Fluid Mech. 150, 139–158
Rowe, M. 1970: Measurements and computations of flow in pipe bends. J. Fluid Mech. 43, 771–783
Shimizu, Y.; Sugino, K. 1980: Hydraulic losses and flow patterns of a swirling flow in Ubends. Bull. JSME 23, 1443–1450
So, R. M. C.; Anwer, M. 1992: Swirling turbulent flow through a curved pipe. Part II: Recovery from swirl and bend curvature. Exp. Fluids, accepted for publication
So, R. M. C.; Mellor, G. L. 1973: Experiment on convex curvature effects in turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 60, 43–62
So, R. M. C.; Mellor, G. L. 1975: Experiments on turbulent boundary layer on a concave wall. Aero. Quart. 26, 25–40
So, R. M. C.; Zhang, H. S.; Lai, Y. G. 1991: Secondary cells and separation in developing laminar curvedpipe flows. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 3, 141–162
Author information
Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anwer, M., So, R.M.C. Swirling turbulent flow through a curved pipe. Experiments in Fluids 14, 85–96 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196992
Received:
Issue Date:
Keywords
 Pipe Flow
 Pipe Diameter
 Bulk Velocity
 Swirl Number
 Curve Pipe