Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 170, Issue 2, pp 181–187 | Cite as

Social stimuli fail to act as entraining agents of circadian rhythms in the golden hamster

  • Roberto Refinetti
  • Dwight E. Nelson
  • Michael Menaker
Article

Summary

The ability of social stimuli to act as entraining agents of circadian rhythms was investigated in golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). In a first experiment, pairs of male hamsters (one of them enucleated and the other intact) were maintained under a light-dark (LD) cycle with a period of 23.3 h. Running-wheel activity was recorded to determine the effect of social interaction on the free-running circadian rhythm of activity. In several pairs, general activity and body temperature were also recorded. In all pairs the intact animals entrained to the LD cycle, whereas the activity rhythms of the enucleated animals free-ran with periods of approximately 24 h and showed no apparent sign of synchronization or relative coordination with the other member of the pair. In a second experiment, male hamsters maintained in constant darkness received pulses of social interaction, which have been reported to induce phase shifts of the activity rhythm. Consistent phase shifts in the running-wheel activity rhythm were not induced by the social pulses in our experiment. These results suggest strongly that social stimuli are not effective entraining agents of circadian rhythms in the golden hamster.

Key words

Circadian rhythm Entrainment Social interaction Locomotor activity Body temperature 

Abbreviations

CT

circadian time

LD

light-dark

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aschoff J (1960) Exogenous and endogenous components in circadian rhythms. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 25:11–28Google Scholar
  2. Aschoff J (1981) Free-running and entrained circadian rhythms. In: Aschoff J (ed) Handbook of behavioral neurobiology, vol 4. Plenum Press, New York, pp 81–94Google Scholar
  3. Bovet J, Oertli EF (1974) Free-running circadian activity rhythms in free-living beaver (Castor canadensis). J Comp Physiol 92:1–10Google Scholar
  4. Crowley M, Bovet J (1980) Social synchronization of circadian rhythms in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:99–105Google Scholar
  5. Davis FC, Stice S, Menaker M (1987) Activity and reproductive state in the hamster: independent control by social stimuli and a circadian pacemaker. Physiol Behav 40:583–590Google Scholar
  6. Erkert HG, Nagel B, Stephani I (1986) Light and social effects on the free-running circadian activity rhythm in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus; Primates): social masking, pseudosplitting, and relative coordination. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:443–452Google Scholar
  7. Honrado GI, Mrosovsky N (1989) Arousal by sexual stimuli accelerates the re-entrainment of hamsters to phase advanced lightdark cycles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:57–63Google Scholar
  8. Kleinknecht S (1985) Lack of social entrainment of free-running circadian activity rhythms in the Australian sugar glider (Petaurus breviceps: Marsupialia). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:189–193Google Scholar
  9. Marimuthu G, Rajan S, Chandrashekaran MK (1981) Social entrainment of the circadian rhythm in the flight activity of the microchiropteran bat Hipposideros speoris. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:147–150Google Scholar
  10. Moore RY, Eichler VB (1972) Loss of circadian adrenal corticosterone rhythm following suprachiasmatic lesions in the rat. Brain Res 42:201–206Google Scholar
  11. Mrosovsky N (1988) Phase response curves for social entrainment. J Comp Physiol A 162:35–46Google Scholar
  12. Nelson DE, Takahashi JS (1991) Sensitivity and integration in a visual pathway for circadian entrainment in the hamster, Mesocricetus auratus. J Physiol (Lond) 439:115–145Google Scholar
  13. Pittendrigh CS (1981) Circadian systems: entrainment. In: Aschoff J (ed) Handbook of behavioral neurobiology, vol 4. Plenum Press, New York, pp 95–124Google Scholar
  14. Ralph MR, Foster RG, Davis FC, Menaker M (1990) Transplanted suprachiasmatic nucleus determines circadian period. Science 247:975–978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Reebs SG, Mrosovsky N (1989) Effects of induced wheel running in the circadian activity rhythms of Syrian hamsters: entrainment and phase response curve. J Biol Rhythms 4:39–48Google Scholar
  16. Refinetti R, Menaker M (1992) Evidence for separate control of estrous and circadian periodicity in the golden hamster. Beh Neur Biol (in press)Google Scholar
  17. Regal PJ, Connolly MS (1980) Social influences on biological rhythms. Behaviour 72:171–199Google Scholar
  18. Richter CP (1970) Dependence of successful mating in rats on functioning of the 24-h clocks of the male and female. Commun Behav Biol 5:1–5Google Scholar
  19. Sokolove PG, Bushell WN (1978) The chi square periodogram: its utility for analysis of circadian rhythms. J Theor Biol 72:131–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Stephan FK, Zucker I (1972) Circadian rhythms in drinking behavior and locomoter activity of rats are eliminated by hypothalamic lesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69:1583–1586Google Scholar
  21. Turek FW (1988) Do circadian biologists and chronopharmacologists talk the same “language”? Annu Rev Chronopharmacol 4:205–208Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Refinetti
    • 1
  • Dwight E. Nelson
    • 1
  • Michael Menaker
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations