Skip to main content
Log in

A statistical analysis of some genetical, physiological and anatomical parameters of the development of in situ- and in vitro-grown ovules from intra- and interspecific crosses in the genus Beta

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Sexual Plant Reproduction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Structural observations on in situ- and in vitro-grown ovules from different intra- and interspecific crosses in the genus Beta were tested using computer registration and statistical analysis. In intra- as well as interspecific crosses embryo development occurs with the same rate independent of growth conditions. Therefore, with respect to growth rate, embryo development seems to be highly autonomous, provided that nutrient influx into the ovule is sufficient. The endosperm develops significantly more rapidly during in vitro culture than in situ. A large degree of variability with respect to structural changes in the ovule tissue during in vitro culture is observed in and between the crosses. In general, the interspecific cross responds more rapidly on in vitro culture. In all crosses the embryo, although genetically identical to the suspensor, shows a higher degree of response to in vitro culture than the embryo itself. Early suspensor degeneration in the interspecific cross is the only observed difference between the crosses, which could explains the lack of root formation in seedlings of interspecific hybrids. The use of statistical analysis on the anatomical parameters used to compare treatment as well as crosses has proven to be an efficient and novel approach to plant reproduction biology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Artschwager E (1927) Development of flowers and seed in the sugar beet. J Agric Res 34:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Artschwager E, Starrett RC (1933) The time factor in fertilization and embryo development in the sugar beet. J Agric Res 47:823–843

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley CA (1977) Ovule culture: Fundamental and pragmatic research for the cotton industry. In: Reinert J, Bajaj TPS (eds) Applied and fundamental aspects of plant cell, tissue, and organ culture. Narosa Publ House, New Delhi, pp 160–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett CW, Esau K (1937) Further studies on the relation of the curly top virus to plant tissue. J Agric Res 53:595–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossoutrot D, Hosemans D (1985) Gynogenesis in Beta vulgaris L.: From in vitro culture of unpollinated ovules to the production of doubled haploid plants in soil. Plant Cell Rep 4:300–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruun L (1991) Histological and semi-quantitative approaches to in vitro cellular responses of ovule, embryo and endosperm in sugar beet Beta vulgaris L. Sex Plant Reprod 4:64–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruun L, Olesen P (1988) A structural investigation of the ovule in sugar beet, Beta vulgaris: The degenerated synergid and the micropylar nucellus. In: Cristi M, Gori P, Pacini E (eds) Sexual reproduction in higher plants, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 462

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruun L, Olesen P (1989a) A structural investigation of the ovule in sugar beet, Beta vulgaris: The micropylar nucellus. Nord J Bot 9:81–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruun L, Olesen P 1989b Cell wall modifications of hypostase cells controlling nutrient influx in Beta vulgaris ovules. In: Fry SC, Brett CT, Reid JSG (eds) Fifth Cell Wall Meeting 30th august–2nd September, Edinburgh, Abstr no. 181

  • Coe GE (1954) A grafting technique enabling an unthrifty interspecific hybrid of Beta to survive. Proc Am Soc Sugar Beet Tech 8:157–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Coons GH (1975) Interspecific hybrids between Beta vulgaris L. and the wild species of Beta. J Am Soc Sugar Beet Tech 18:281–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook SK, Adams H, Hedley CL, Ambrose MJ, Wang TL (1988) An analysis of seed development in Pisum sativum. VII. Embryo development and precocious germination in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 14:89–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsi G (1972) The suspensor of Eruca sativa Miller (Cruciferae) during embryogenesis in vitro. Gi Bot Ital 106:41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Halluin K, Keimer B (1986) Production of haploid sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.) by ovule culture In: Horn W et al. (eds) Genetic manipulation in plant breeding. W de Gruyter & Co, Berlin New York, pp 307–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Doctrinal M, Sangwan RS, Sangwan-Noreel BS (1989) In vitro gynogenesis in Beta vulgaris L.: Effects of plant growth regulators, temperature, genotypes and season. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 17:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadwall VR, Joshi AB, Iyer RD (1968) Inter-specific hybrids in Abelmoschus through ovule and embryo culture. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 28:269–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskill JO (1954) Viable hybrids from matings of chard with Beta procumbenr and Beta webbiana. JASSBT 8:148–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinathan MC, Babu CR, Shivanna KR (1986) Interspecific hybridization between rice bean (Vigna umbellata) and its wild relative (V. minima): Fertility — sterility relationships. Euphytica 35:1017–1022

    Google Scholar 

  • Heel Van JPD (1925) Onderzoekingen over de ontwikkeling van de anthere, van den zaadknop en van het zaad bij Beta vulgaris L. PhD thesis, Naarden, The Netherlands, p 67

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosemans D, Bossoutrot D (1983) Induction of haploid plants from in vitro culture of unpollinated beet ovules (Beta vulgaris L.). Z Pflanzenzücht 91:74–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosemans D, Bossoutrot D (1985) In vitro culture of unpollinated beet (Beta vulgaris L.) ovules of male-sterile and male-fertile plants and induction of haploid plants. In: Chapmann GP, Mantell SH, Daniels RW (eds) Experimental manipulation of ovule tissues. Plant Sciences, Longman, New York, pp 79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain MM, Inden H, Asahira T (1988) Intergeneric and interspecific hybrids through in vitro ovule culture in the Cruciferae. Plant Sci 58:121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Jassem M (1972) Embryological investigations into the development of monogerm diploid, triploid and tetraploid sugar beet seeds. Pr Komisji Nauk Rolniczych Biologicznych Ser B, Warszawa 15:69–105 (in Polish, English abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jassem M (1973) Endosperm development in diploid, triploid and tetraploid seed of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Genet Pol 14:295–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi PC, Johri BM (1972) In vitro growth of ovules of Gossypium hirsutum. Phytomorphology 22:195–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall M, Stuart A (1979) The advanced theory of statistics, Vol 2. Macmillan Publ Co

  • Monnier M, Lagriffol J (1985) Development of embryos in Capsella ovules cultured in vitro. In: Chapman GP, Mantell SH, Daniels RW (eds) The experimental manipulation of ovule tissues. Longman, New York London, pp 117–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen JE, Olesen P (1988) Isolation of sperm cells from trinucleate pollen of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). In: Wilms HJ, Keijzer CJ (eds) Plant sperm cell as tools for biotechnology. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 111–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Olesen P, Bruun L (1990) A structural investigation of the in sugar beet, Beta vulgaris: Integuments and micropyle. Nord J Bot 9:499–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Olesen P, Bruun L, Buck E, Keimer B (1988) Structure and variability of embryos, endosperm and perisperm during in vitro culture of sugar beet, Beta vulgaris ovules. In: Cresti M, Gori P, Pacini E (eds) Sexual reproduction in higher plants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghavan V (1986) Embryogenesis in angiosperms. A developmental and experimental study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 303

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangan TS (1982) Ovary, ovule, and nucleus culture. In: Johri BM (ed) Experimental embryology of vascular plants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 105–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangan TS (1984) Culture of ovules. In: Vasil IK (ed) Cell culture and somatic cell genetics of plants, vol 1. Academic Press, London, pp 227–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Savitsky H (1960) Viable diploid, triploid and tetraploid hybrids between Beta vulgaris and species of the section Patellares. J Am Soc Sugar Beet Tech 11:215–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Savitsky H (1975) Hybridization between Beta vulgaris and B. procumbens and transmission of nematode (Heterodera schachtii) resistance to sugar beet. Can J Genet Cytol 17:197–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Speckmann GJ, De Bock SM (1982) The production of alien monosomic additions in Beta vulgaris as a source for the introgression of resistance to beet root nematode (Heterrodera schachtii) from Beta species of the section Patellares. Euphytica 31:313–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeshita M, Kalo M, Tokumasu S (1980) Application of ovule culture to the production of intergeneric or interspecific hybrids in Brassica and Raphanus. Jpn J Genet 55:373–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Valmayor HL, Sagawa Y (1967) Ovule culture in some orchids. Am Orchid Soc Bull 36:766–769

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Geyt J, Speckmann GJ, D'Halluin K, Jacobs M (1987) In vitro induction of haploid plants from unpollinated ovules and ovaries of the sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet 73:920–925

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung EC (1980) Embryogeny of Phaseolus: The role of the suspensor. Z Planzenphysiol 96:17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung EC, Sussex IM (1979) Embryogeny of Phaseolus coccineus: The suspensor and the growth of the embryo-proper in vitro. Z Planzenphysiol 91:423–433

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brunn, L. A statistical analysis of some genetical, physiological and anatomical parameters of the development of in situ- and in vitro-grown ovules from intra- and interspecific crosses in the genus Beta . Sexual Plant Reprod 4, 118–125 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196498

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196498

Key words

Navigation