Skip to main content
Log in

Muscarine receptor types mediating autoinhibition of acetylcholine release and sphincter contraction in the guinea-pig iris

  • Published:
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The potencies of several muscarine receptor antagonists in blocking either the autoinhibition of acetylcholine release or the muscarinic contraction of the sphincter muscle upon acetylcholine release were investigated in the guinea-pig iris. The agonist at pre- or postjunctional muscarine receptors was acetylcholine released upon field stimulation (5.5 Hz, 2 min) of the irides preloaded with 14C-choline. The stimulation-evoked 14C-overflow was doubled in the presence of atropine 0.1 μmol/l but unaffected by the agonist (±)-methacholine (50 μmol/l). Thus, under the present stimulation conditions, the autoinhibition of acetylcholine release on the guinea-pig iris cholinergic nerves was nearly maximally activated. Isotonic contractions of the irides upon field stimulation consisted of a rapid, atropine (0.1 μmol/l). peak phase followed by a sustained contraction which involved a cholinergic and a non-cholinergic stimulation of the sphincter muscle. The M2-selective antagonists methoctramine (10 μmol/l) and gallamine (100 µmol/l). increased both the 14Goverflow and the peak contractions evoked by field stimulation. In contrast, the M3-selective antagonist hexahydrosiladifenidol (0.1–10 μmol/l) failed to affect the evoked 14C-release but concentration-dependently (1–10 μmol/l) reduced the iris contractions. Pirenzepine (10 μmol/l) enhanced the evoked 14C-overflow and inhibited the peak contractions (0.1–10 μmol/l; maximal effect at 10 μmol/l). The low potency of the antagonist at both receptor sites indicates that an M1 muscarine receptor is not involved. The results are consistent with the idea of M2 muscarine receptors mediating autoinhibition of acetylcholine release in the guinea-pig iris and M3-like receptors inducing the contraction of the sphincter muscle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhtar RA, Honkanen RE, Howe PH, Abdel-Latif AA (1987) M2 muscarinic receptor subtype is associated with inositol trisphosphate accumulation, myosin light chain phosphorylation and contraction in sphincter smooth muscle of rabbit iris. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 243:624–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow RB, Berry KJ, Glenton PAM, Nikolaou NM, Soh KS (1976) A comparison of affinity constants for muscarnne-sensitive acetylcholine receptors in guinea-pig atrial pacemaker cells at 29°C and in ileum at 29°C and 37°C. Br J Pharmacol 58:613–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes PJ, Minette P, Maclagan J (1988) Muscarinic receptor subtypes in airways. Trends Pharmacol Sci 9:412–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdsall NJM, Hulme EC (1983) Muscarinic receptor subclasses. Trends Pharmacol Sci 4:459–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Bognar IT, Pallas S, Fuder H, Muscholl E (1988) Muscarinic inhibition of [3H]-noradrenaline release on rabbit iris in vitro: effects of stimulation conditions on intrinsic activity of methacholine and pilocarpine. Br J Pharmacol 94:890–900

    Google Scholar 

  • Bognar IT, Baumann B, Dammann F, Knöll B, Meincke M, Pallas S, Fuder H (1989) M2 muscarinic receptors on the iris sphincter muscle differ from those on iris noradrenergic nerves. Eur J Pharmacol 163:263–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner TI (1989) The molecular basis of muscarinic receptor diversity. Trends Neurosci 12:148–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner TI, Buckley NJ, Young AC, Brann MR (1987) Identification of a family of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor genes. Science 237:527–532

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DA, Forward A, Marsh S (1980) Antagonist discrimination between ganglionic and ileal muscarinic receptors. Br J Pharmacol 71:362–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark AL, Mitchelson F (1976) The inhibitory effect of gallamine on muscarinic receptors. Br J Pharmacol 58:323–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Dammann F, Fuder H, Giachetti A, Giraldo E, Kilbinger H, Micheletti R (1989) AF-DX 116 differentiates between prejunctional muscarine receptors located on noradrenergic and cholinergic nerves. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 339:268–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Doods HN, Mathy M-J, Davidesko D, van Charldorp KJ, de Jonge A, van Zwieten PA (1987) Selectivity of muscarinic antagonists in radioligand and in vivo experiments for the putative M1, M2 and M3 receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 242:257–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Eglen RM, Whiting RL (1986) Muscarinic receptor subtypes: a critique of the current classification and a proposal for a working nomenclature. J Anton Pharmacol 5:323–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuder H (1982) The affinity of pirenzepine and other antimuscarinic compounds for pre- and postsynaptic muscarine receptors of the isolated rabbit and rat heart. Scand J Gastroenterol 72 (Suppl):79–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuder H, Meiser C, Wormstall H,Muscholl E (1981) The effects of several muscarinic antagonists on pre- and postsynaptic receptors in the isolated rabbit heart. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 316:31–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuder H, Kilbinger H, Müller H (1985) Organ selectivity of hexahydrosiladifenidol in blocking pre- and postjunctional muscarinic receptors studied in guinea-pig ileum and rat heart. Eur J Pharmacol 113:125–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujiwara M, Hayashi H, Muramatsu I, Ueda N (1984) Super-sensitivity of the rabbit iris sphincter muscle induced by trigeminal denervation: the role of substance P. J Physiol 350:583–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Furchgott RF (1972) The classification of adrenoceptors (adrenergic receptors). An evaluation from the standpoint of receptor theory. In: Blaschko B, Muscholl E (eds). Handb Exp Pharmacol, vol 33. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 283–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Giachetti A, Micheletti R, Montagna E (1986) Cardioselective profile of AF-DX 116, a muscarine M2 receptor antagonist. Life Sci 38:1663–1672

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilani SAH, Cobbin LB (1986) The cardio-selectivity of himbacine: a muscarine receptor antagonist. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 332:16–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson L, Hedqvist P, Lundgren G (1980) Pre- and post-junctional effects of prostaglandin E2, prostaglandin synthetase inhibitors and atropine on cholinergic neurotransmission in guinea pig ileum and bovine iris. Acta Physiol Scand 110:401–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer R, Giachetti A (1982) Muscarinic receptor subtypes: M1 and M2. Biochemical and functional characterization. Life Sci 31:2991–2998

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilbinger H (1989) Neuronal muscarine receptors modulating acetylcholine release. In: Van Zwieten PA, Schönbaum E (eds) Progress in pharmacology and clinical pharmacology, vol 7/1. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart-New York, pp 33–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilbinger H, Nafziger M (1985) Two types of neuronal muscarine receptors modulating acetylcholine release from guinea-pig myenteric plexus. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 328:304–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Leander S, Håkanson R, Rosell S, Folkers K, Sundler F, Tornqvist K (1981) A specific substance P antagonist blocks smooth muscle contractions induced by non-cholinergic, non-adrenergic nerve stimulation. Nature 294:467–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Li CK, Mitchelson F (1980) The selective antimuscarinic action of stercuronium. Br J Pharmacol 70:313–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattio TG, Richardson JS, Giacobini E (1984) Effects of DFP on iridic metabolism and release of acetylcholine and on pupillary function in the rat. Neuropharmacology 23:1207–1214

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchiorre C (1988) Polymethylene tetramines: a new generation of selective muscarinic antagonists. Trends Pharmacol Sci 9:216–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutschler E, Lambrecht G (1984) Selective muscarinic agonists and antagonists in functional tests. Trends Pharmacol Sci 5 (Suppl):39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutschler E, Moser U, Wess J, Lambrecht G (1988) New approaches to the subclassification of muscarinic receptors. In: Melchiorre C, Gianella M (eds) Recent advances in receptor chemistry, vol 11. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 195–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Peralta EG, Winslow JW, Peterson GL, Smith DH, Ashkenazi A, Ramachandran J, Schimerlik MI, Capon DJ (1987) Primary structure and biochemical properties of an M2 muscarinic receptor. Science 236:600–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar M, Shimada K, Patil PN (1976) Iris pigmentation and atropine mydriasis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 197:79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeppi U (1966) Postganglionic nature of parasympathetic innervation of pig iris sphincter. Am J Physiol 210:91–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueda N, Muramatsu I, Fujiwara M (1984) Capsaicin and bradykinin-induced substance P-ergic responses in the iris sphincter muscle of the rabbit. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 230:469–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshitomi T, Ito Y (1988) Effects of indomethacin and prostaglandins on the dog iris sphincter and dilator muscles. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 29:127–132

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Send offprint requests to I. T. Bognar at the above address

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bognar, I.T., Wesner, M.T. & Fuder, H. Muscarine receptor types mediating autoinhibition of acetylcholine release and sphincter contraction in the guinea-pig iris. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 341, 22–29 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00195053

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00195053

Key words

Navigation