Interspecific crosses between Tulipa gesneriana cultivars and wild Tulipa species: a survey

Summary

Interspecific crosses were made between 76 Tulipa gesneriana cultivars and 28 botanical Tulipa species. Tulipa gesneriana proved fully congruent (all cross-combinations giving hybrid progeny) with members of the subsection Gesnerianae, was moderately affiliated (50% of all cross-combinations giving hybrid progeny) with representatives of the subsection Eichleres, and was found to be incongruent with most other Tulipa species (except T. stapfii of the subsection Oculussolis).

Relationships between T. gesneriana and some representatives of the subsection Eichleres were addressed in more detail. Seeds were harvested in all cross-combinations, but the number of seeds depended on the T. gesneriana cultivar used as the female partner. Apparently, the maternal genotype did affect pre- or post-fertilization processes.

T. gesneriana was not crossable with T. kaufmanniana of the subsection Spiranthera. In this specific case, however, a bridge cross was used to overcome incongruity. For this, T. kaufmanniana was first combined with T. greigii, and the hybrid was subsequently crossed with T. gesneriana.

These results demonstrate possibilities for interspecific cross-combinations in tulips and have offered opportunities for the introduction of desired new traits in the cultivated tulip.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Botschantzeva ZP (1962) Tulips. Taxonomy, morphology, cytology, phytogeography and physiology (Russian edn). English translation: Varekamp HQ (1982) Balkema, Rotterdam

  2. Boissier E (1882) Liliaceae (Tulipa). Flora Orientalis 5:191–201

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hall AD (1940) The genus Tulipa. The Royal Horticultural Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hogenboom NG (1973) A model for incongruity in intimate partner relationships. Euphytica 22:219–233

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kho YO, Baër J (1971) Incompatibility problems in species crosses of tulips. Euphytica 20:30–35

    Google Scholar 

  6. Royal General Bulbgrowers' Association (1987) Classified list and international register of tulip names. Hillegom, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stork A (1984) Tulipes sauvages et cultiveés. Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques. Série documentaire 13

  8. Van Eijk JP, Varekamp HQ (1987) Collections of species and ancient cultivars of tulip (Tulipa L.) in the Netherlands. Proceedings broadening genetic base crops, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 399–404

  9. Van Eijk JP, Eikelboom W, Hogenboom NG (1978) The importance of wild species and old cultivars for the breeding of flower bulbs. Acta Hortic 177:139–143

    Google Scholar 

  10. Van Tuyl, Straathof TP, Bino RJ, Kwakkenbos AAM (1988) Effect of three pollination methods on embryo development and seed set in intra- and interspecific crosses between Lilium species. Sex Plant Reprod 1:119–123

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. Van Eijk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Eijk, J.P., Van Raamsdonk, L.W.D., Eikelboom, W. et al. Interspecific crosses between Tulipa gesneriana cultivars and wild Tulipa species: a survey. Sexual Plant Reprod 4, 1–5 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00194563

Download citation

Key words

  • Tulipa
  • Tulip
  • Interspecific hybridization
  • Incongruity
  • Breeding