Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 355–362 | Cite as

Namibia's orange river boundary — origin and reemerged effects of an inattentive colonial boundary delimination

  • Demhardt Imre Josef 
A New South Africa — A New South African Geography?
  • 41 Downloads

Conclusion

From the above and beside the securing of water rights for the national mining industry, the irrigation clusters scattered as if pearls along the Orange River's N bank are of an obviously unrenouncable significance for the Namibian agricultural production. In any case, it is clearly of utmost importance for Windhoek to secure the possession of the N flood plain by a boundary accord to be reached as soon as possible. This should determine as a minimal solution the border line finally along the low water mark, or, certainly more advantageous for the country, following the rivers median line. Even more so because, in spite of the high costs this would entail due to the lack of infrastructure in the inaccessible Orange gorge, the future extending potential of the irrigation schemes on the N bank are be estimated at least on 7800 ha (Otzen 1989) which is six times the developed irrigation area at the present stage and more than the actual overall Namibian irrigated cultivation area.

In order to strengthen the claim to all areas presently disputed between the Republics of Namibia and South Africa and backed by several in international law not binding UN General Assembly resolutions, the Windhoek Constitutional Assembly resolved Article 1 (4) of the new Namibian constitution: “The national of Namibia shall consist of the whole of territory recognised by the international community through the organs of the United Nations as Namibia, including the enclave, harbour and port of Walvis Bay, as well as the off-shore islands of Namibia, and its southern boundary shall extend to the middle of the Orange River.” Secret negotiations have been taking place since 21st March 1990 but as in the case of the much disputed possession of Walvis Bay, the Republic of South Africa cannot be forced to accept the low water line or the now constitutionally claimed median line as the revised Orange River boundary. South Africa remains internationally unsuable and the small Namibia is presently unable to put pressure on the leading regional power. On the contrary, such a substantial revision of the failures of the late German colonial administration seems only be attainable, if it all, after a phase of ‘positive development’ in Windhoek, so to be recognised by Pretoria, which then could be result in a voluntary surrender of the South African claim to the N bank to seal then hopefully reached good neighbourly relations between the Republic of South Africa and the recently emerged Republic of Namibia.

Keywords

Median Line Irrigation Scheme Neighbourly Relation National Mining Colonial Administration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cornell, F. C.: The lower reaches of the Orange River. Geogeaphical Journal 57, 241–252 (1921)Google Scholar
  2. Dannhauser, J. A.: Die geografiese grense van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika — 'n studie in internasionale verhoudinge. Bloemfonstein 1974.Google Scholar
  3. Demhardt, I. J.: Die Errichtung der deutschen Herrschaft über Südwestafrika und die Entstehung ihrer kolonialen Grenzlinien. In: Lamping, H. (ed.), Namibia (= Frankfurter Wirtschafts-und Sozialgeographische Schriften 53), pp. 109–139.Google Scholar
  4. Erasmus, G.: How to Farm on the South African/Namibian Border: Problems in Demarcating a River Boundary. South African Yearbook of International Law 10, 121–137 (1985)Google Scholar
  5. Hertslet, E.: The Map of Africa by Treaty (3 volumes). 3rd edn. (reprint) London 1967.Google Scholar
  6. Holdich, T. H.: Political Frontiers and Boundary Making. London 1916.Google Scholar
  7. Jones, S. B.: Boundary-Making. A Handbook for Statesmen, Treaty Editors and Boundary commissioners. Washington 1945.Google Scholar
  8. Koornhof, A. J.: Die internasionale Riviergrense van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika. Pretoria 1981.Google Scholar
  9. Kristoff, L. D.: The Nature of Frontiers and Boundaries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 49, 269–282 (1959)Google Scholar
  10. Leser, H.: Namibia. Stuttgart 1982.Google Scholar
  11. von Moltke, J.: The Boundaries of South West Africa. SWA Annual, 170–172 (1977)Google Scholar
  12. Otzen, U.: Sektorstudie Landwirtschaft (= Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik Berlin, Grundlagenstudie Namibia, Volume 4). Berlin and München 1989.Google Scholar
  13. Pierard, R. V.: The German Colonial Society 1882–1914. State University of Iowa 1964.Google Scholar
  14. Schneider, G. I. C.: Die Bedeutung des Bergbaus für die Wirtschaft SWA/Namibias. In: Lamping, H. (ed.), Namibia (= Frankfurter Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeographische Schriften 53), pp. 259–274. Frankfurt am Main 1989.Google Scholar
  15. Schneider, G. I. C.; Schneider, M. B.: Grundlagen zur geographischen und geologischen Ausgangssituation Südwestafrikas/Namibias. In: Lamping, H. (ed.), Namibia (= Frankfurter Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeographische Schriften 53), pp. 37–56. Frankfurt am Main 1989.Google Scholar
  16. Schneider, M. B.: Bewässerungslandwirtschaft in SWA/Namibia. Wasser + Boden 8, 433–436 (1988)Google Scholar
  17. Schneider, M. B.: Leitlinien der wasserwirtschaftlichen Versorgung. In: Lamping, H. (ed.), Namibia (= Frankfurter Wirtschafts-und Sozialgeographische Schriften 53), 212–228. Frankfurt am Main 1989.Google Scholar
  18. Sell, M.: Das deutsch-englische Abkommen von 1890 über Helgoland und die afrikanischen Kolonien im Lichte der deutschen Presse. Berlin and Bonn 1926.Google Scholar
  19. Shaw, M.: Title to territory in Africa. International legal issues. Oxford 1986.Google Scholar
  20. Trollope, L.: Report on the administration of the Eastern Caprivi Zipfel. (unpublished manuscript) 1940.Google Scholar
  21. United Nations Institute for Namibia (ed.): Namibia: Perspectives for National Reconstruction and Development. Lusaka 1986.Google Scholar
  22. von Weber, O.: Geschichte des Schutzgebietes Deutsch-Südwest-Afrika. 2nd edn. Windhoek 1979.Google Scholar
  23. Wellington, J. H.: The evolution of the Orange River bassin: some outstanding problems. South African Geographical Journal 40, 3–30 (1958)Google Scholar
  24. Windhoek Observer: Orange frontier talks, p. 25 (5. 7. 1986)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Demhardt Imre Josef 
    • 1
  1. 1.WiesbadenGermany

Personalised recommendations