Skip to main content
Log in

Critical studies on the sexuality of southern Argentinian Ericaceae

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Sexual Plant Reproduction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The family Ericaceae is considered to be mostly hermaphroditic and only in a few cases unisexual or dioecious. Five Argentinian species (Gaultheria antarctica Hook, f., G. caespitosa P. et E., G. phillyreaefolia (Pers.) Sleumer, G. tenuifolia (Phil.) Sleumer and Pernettya insana (Molina) Gunckel), previously described as hermaphroditic, were found by us to have two types of flowers: female and male. Female flowers have both a rudimentary androecium with stamens, in which the anthers are small, collapsed and without pollen grains or are reduced to filaments only, and a perfect gynoecium with well-developed ovules filling the carpel locules. The stigma is expanded and of the wet, papillate type, with copious to slight secretion. The stigma protrudes above the anthers. Male flowers have a well-developed androecium included within the corolla and a reduced gynoecium. Anthers are as long as the filaments, except in G. caespitosa. Pollen is shed as tetrads which are 100% viable. Ovule development ranges from total absence, passing through aborted ovules of various sizes to apparently normal ones. Stigmata are neither expanded nor papillate, except in Pernettya insana. Only in two species do the style and stigma extend beyond the level of the anthers. Heterostyly does not occur in any of the five species studied. Functional dioecy thus characterizes the five species considered and is reported for the first time in the genus Gaultheria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aalders LE, Hall IV (1963) The inheritance and morphological development of male-sterility in the common lowbush blueberry, Vaccinium angustifolium Ait. Can J Genet Cytol 5:380–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander MP (1969) Differential staining of aborted and nonaborted pollen. Stain Technol 44:117–122

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Artopoeus A (1903) Über den Bau und die Öffnungsweise der Antheren und die Entwicklung der Samen der Ericaceen. Flora 92:309–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham G, Hooker JD (1876) Ericaceae. In: Genera plantarum, vol II/2. Lovell Reeve/Williams & Northgate, London, pp 577–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay K, Ellstrand NC (1981) Stylar polymorphism in Epigaea repens, a dioecious species. Bull Torrey Bot Club 108:305–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocucci A (1969) El proceso sexual en angiospermas. Kurtziana 5:407–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocucci A (1980) Precisiones sobre la terminología sexológica aplicada a las angiospermas. Bol Soc Arg Bot vol XIX/1–2:75–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe L (1964) The evolution of outbreeding in plants. I. The angiosperms. Heredity 19:435–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1877) The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Drude O (1891) Ericaceae. In: Engler A, Prantl K (eds) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol IV/1–2. Engelmann, Leipzig, pp 15–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Emberger L (1960) Les végétaux vasculaires. In: Chadefaud M, Emberger L (eds) Traité de botanique systématique, vol II/2. Masson, Paris, pp 1291–1299

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel R, Galun E (1977) Pollination mechanisms, reproduction and plant breeding. (Monographs on theoretical and applied genetics, vol 2) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin DA (1962) The Ericaceae in New Zealand (Gaultheria and Pernettya). Trans R Soc N Z Bot 1:155–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell P (1957) Mode of reproduction of higher plants. Bot Rev 23:135–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray A (1876) Heteromorphism in Epigaea. Am J Sci 3:74–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall IV, Aalders LE, Wood GW (1966) Female sterility in the common lowbush blueberry, Vaccinium angustifolium Ait. Can J Genet Cytol 8:296–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsted BD (1891) Notes upon Epigaea repens. Bull Torrey Bot Club 18:249–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison Y (1981) Stigma characteristics and angiosperm taxonomy. Nord J Bot 1:401–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison Y, Shivanna KR (1977) The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma. Ann Bot (London) 41:1233–1258

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcok C, Cronquist A (1973) Flora of the Pacific Northwest. An illustrated manual. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Wash

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmgren PK, Keuken W, Schofield EK (1981) Index herbariorum, 7th edn. Regnum Veg 106:1–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson J (1959) The families of flowering plants. (Dicotyledons, vol 1) Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson J (1964) The genera of flowering plants, vol 1. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikuse M (1954) The presence of viscin threads among pollen grains in Phyllodoceae, etc. of Ericaceae. J Jpn Bot 29:146–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn TL, De Mason DA (1986) A quantitative and structural comparison of Citrus pollen tube development in cross-compatible and self-incompatible gynoecia. Can J Bot 64:2548–2555

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D (1942) The evolution of sex in flowering plants. Biol Rev 17:46–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Linskens H (1975) The physiological basis of incompatibility in angiosperms. Biol J Linn Soc 7 [Suppl 1]:143–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews J, Taylor G (1926) The structure and development of the stamen in Erica hirtiflora. Trans Proc Bot Soc Edinburgh 29:235–242

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean R, Ivimey-Cook C (1956) A textbook of theoretical botany, vol 2. Longmans, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehan T (1868) Variations in Epigaea repens. Proc Acad Nat Sci Philadelphia 20:153–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaux A (1889) Extracts from the Journal of André Michaux written during his travels in the U.S. and Canada, 1785–1796. Proc Am Philos Soc 26:1–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore DM (1983) Flora of Tierra del Fuego. Nelson, Oswestry

  • Palser BF (1951) Studies of floral morphology in the Ericales. I. Organography and vascular anatomy in the Andromedeae. Bot Gaz (Chicago) 112:447–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Palser BF (1958) Studies of floral morphology in the Ericales. IV. Observations on three members of the Gaultherieae. Trans Ill State Acad Sci 51:24–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendle A (1925) The classification of flowering plants, vol 2. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross MD (1969) Heteromorphism and the evolution of dioecy in Epigaea repens. Heredity 24:162–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross MD (1982) Five evolutionary pathways to subdioecy. Am Nat 119:297–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultze-Motel W (1964) Ericaceae. In: Engler A (ed) Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, vol 2. Borntraeger, Berlin, pp 381–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleumer H (1952) Las Ericáceas argentinas. Lilloa 25:515–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleumer H (1966) Ericaceae. In: Van Steenis CGGJ (ed) Flora Malesiana, ser I, vol VI/4. Botanic Gardens Indonesia, Bogor/Rijksherbarium, Leiden, pp 469–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleumer H (1985) Taxonomy of the genus Pernettya Gaud (Ericaceae). Bot Jahrb Syst Pflanzengesch Pflanzengeogr 105:449–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens NE (1911) Dioecism in the trailing arbutus, with notes on the morphology of the seed. Bull Torrey Bot Club 38:531–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens PF (1971) A classification of the Ericaceae: subfamilies and tribes. Bot J Linn Soc 64:1–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Thieret JW (1973) Sex and the angiosperms. SIDA Contrib Bot 5:59–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Villamil PH de (1980) Stamens in the Ericaceae: a developmental study. PhD thesis, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuilleumier BS (1967) The origin and evolutionary development of heterostyly in the angiosperms. Evolution 21:210–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner WH (1975) Sex and the angiosperms — another proposition. SIDA Contrib Bot 6:63–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson L, Williams WT, Lance GN (1967) A mixed-data numerical approach to angiosperm taxonomy: the classification of Ericales. Proc Linn Soc London 178:25–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams EG, Knox RB, Rouse JL (1982) Pollination sub-systems distinguished by pollen tube arrest after incompatible interspecific crosses in Rhododendron (Ericaceae). J Cell Sci 53:255–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis JC (1973) A dictionary of the flowering plants and ferns, 8th edn. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson WP (1893) Observations on Epigaea repens L. Contrib Bot Lab Univ Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 1:56–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Yampolsky E, Yampolsky H (1922) Distribution of sex forms in the phanerogamic flora. Bibl Genet 3:1–62

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cambi, V.N., Hermann, P.M. Critical studies on the sexuality of southern Argentinian Ericaceae. Sexual Plant Reprod 2, 142–149 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192760

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192760

Key words

Navigation